Are there any similar accounts of Russian or former Warsaw Pact pilots who flew western types after the cold war? Would be interesting to know about their accounts too.
Seems he states what most people think about the F-35 programme. His thoughts in the Fulcrum are very interesting.
Russian Military and Government Takes Surplus Il-96 Airliners
It’s a shame we don’t see many more large Russian airliners, they’ve always had an imposing presence with elegant lines.
I second Swerve’s notion. It’s annoying seeing a new thread for a piece of news that in most cases isn’t even worth reporting. In addition, all this chap seems to want to do is promote his own aviation news blog, which doesn’t do anything novel, just copy and paste news from other well established sources.
But that intake was already there since years on older aircraft too.
Yes, you’re right, ever since PT04. It seems OBOGS may have always been intended, but only integrated now in the Block II. I think at the moment the O2 supply (based on a French system according to the PAC site http://www.pac.org.pk/jf-17) has a duration of about 3 hours. Along with the IFR probe, the aim is clearly to increase flight endurance beyond 3 hours.
That is a Mirage with IFR.
My mistake, so it is.
An example from the first batch of Block IIs in Chengdu. Some reports that an OBOGS has been installed as part of the Block II upgrade. The bleed air intake above the starboard intake would certainly explain it.


Some more pics…


They look like some aircraft from Black Panthers?
Alan Warnes tweets 5 JF-17 Block II Thunders delivered to the Combat Commanders School at Mushaf AFB.
Unsure if this is to replace the CCS Mirage or F-7 Sqds.
Are you sure they are Block IIs? The serial numbers would suggest late production Block I aircraft, although I think the JF-17 at the end of the line up in the second PIC appears to have a IFR probe with a cover on it?
Could this be a good case for bringing back variable geometry wings? With modern materials and design processes, the significant weight penalty of swing wing designs from the 60s and 70s may not be an issue anymore.
Defence purchases to be hit as funds go for overheads
The finance ministry has cut around Rs 13,000 crore out of the Rs 94,588 crore allocated to the defence ministry in the Union Budget last July.
A defence ministry official, who has knowledge of the revised budgetary allocation which was finalised in December last, told the FE, “We are re-appropriating Rs 13,000 crore from the armed forces’ capital outlays towards revenue expenditure.”What this means is that the finance ministry has decided to take away some funds meant for buying weapons and equipment to pay off the salaries and recurring maintenance expenses, which has grown beyond manageable limits. In July, finance minister Arun Jaitley had allocated Rs 1,34,412 crore towards revenue expenditure of the defence ministry.
The capital budget for the Indian Navy and the Air Force have been cut between Rs 4,000 crore to Rs 5,000 crore, which means that no new defence acquisition contract may be signed this fiscal, including the much-awaited deal for 126 Medium Multi-Role Combat Aircraft (MMRCA) ‘Rafale’ from the French firm Dassault Aviation. Also, sources revealed that the Indian Navy which is currently in talks with the US-based Sikorsky for 16 helicopters has been asked to go slow as there are no funds for new acquisitions.
Even the Indian Army is faced with a nearly Rs 4,000- crore cut in its capital budget this fiscal, forcing it to bring down its more than 100 proposals for weapons and equipment acquisition to 20 important ones, of which seven critical ones are being fast-tracked by the government.
The Chief of Army General Dalbir Singh, at his annual press conference earlier this week, said the force has “over 100 projects for weapons and equipment, but has identified 20 important ones, of which seven critical ones are being fast-tracked.”
The army chief listed seven critical acquisitions, including the already-cleared mounted-guns systems, which would be the first that India would buy if this procurement goes through. Defence Acquisition Council (DAC) headed by defence minister Manohar Parrikar has given the nod for the purchase of 814 mounted artillery guns at a cost of Rs 15,700 crore.
The others on the list, all of which have already been approved by the government, are the 8,000-odd Spike third-generation anti-tank guided missiles to be bought from Israel; 131 light utility helicopters that will be a ‘Make in India’ project now; upgradation of the entire fleet of battle tanks and infantry combat vehicles; assault rifles for the infantrymen; bullet-proof jackets and helmets, again for infantrymen; and night-vision devices for the mechanised forces and the infantry.
A December 2014 report on the Budgetary Demands for Grants for 2014-15, submitted by the parliamentary standing committee on defence, noted that “growth in the budget is not sufficient for the projects and modernization” of the forces. The committee was headed by BJP MP Maj Gen (retd) BC Khanduri.
“The committee perceives it to be a grim and unacceptable situation, which is affecting all the services of defence forces considerably. The committee desires that the ministry should raise the bar and gradually increase defence expenditure to the level of three per cent of the GDP so that modernization of the armed forces can become a reality and not remain a mirage,” the report said.
It also noted that as money for high-value acquisitions like the MMRCA is not available under the current allocation, additional funds will be sought. It has to be seen if the defence ministry makes the additional demand this fiscal or in the next, beginning April 2015.
The serviceability is low because all the aggregates had to be shipped to Irkutsk for overhaul, who weren’t doing an excellent job of it.
I find that surprising. What were the issues with Irkutsk? How is HAL different in this regard?
Just select the T-50 and be done with it.
In modern usage, “terrorist” is simply a label used to refer to People The State Doesn’t Like, usually because they are challenging the authority of The State — an entity, incidentally, that has no more basis in reality than Allah.
With the caveat that they use extreme, indiscriminate violence to challenge any prevailing order, be it a state or otherwise. A political group can challenge the authority of a state, but not necessarily use extreme violence to achieve it.
[ATTACH=CONFIG]234603[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]234604[/ATTACH]Discorde for you.
Not so much Frankenstein so probably OT.
Amazing, I thought it was just one of my fantasies. What a sight that would have been.
Although it was part of a British obsession with re-engining everything possible with Speys*…
…* which I occasionally spoof and occasionally think could legitimately have been taken further.
Wasn’t there plans to install a Spey in the Mirage III? I can’t recall if it was considered for the RAF or a foreign customer, but I would have liked to seen that!
Also, did anyone ever consider the Concorde as a bomber? Kinda like an Anglo-Gaelic version of the Tu-22, Tu-160 or B-1B. Would have made an excellent long range, high speed launch platform for cruise missiles and other stand off weapons I think.