dark light

Alpha Bravo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 455 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: How to Publish an Ideal Aviation Book on a Fighter #2261385
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    Hi all, I’ve published a book or two but mainly philosophical-theological-political in nature. I’ve made up my mind to insh’Allah (God Willing) come up with a book on the JF-17. A book that someone who loves the plane would love, with cool pictures, the best known data, program development, and perhaps interviews.

    So, since I’m a noob at this, I really could use some advice and help on how to organize it, what to put, the do’s and don’t’s. So please do stop by and share with me your thoughts.

    Avoid any references to God.

    Avoid any references to “munir” on PakDef forum…in fact, knowing the way you usually post, avoid any reference to any forum.

    Avoid any references to religion, politics and “your people/civilisation”, which you manage to introduce into virtually every topic/thread.

    Avoid badly drawn pencil artwork of prepubescent fanboys.

    Avoid any lofty claims of the subject matter without substantial references, sources and other supporting material.

    Avoid trying to project the JF-17 as the only solution to all problems for all airforces of the world.

    Avoid including the USAF and the JF-17/J-7G in the same sentence.

    In fact, avoid the whole idea all together…

    Deino’s new book probably has the most latest and up to date details on the aircraft anyway, look forward to getting a copy sometime.

    in reply to: Indian Air Force Thread 20 #2262873
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    Is there a comprehensive record of IAF aircraft accidents anywhere? I’m particularly interested in the number of MiG-29s lost to date.

    Have you tried this site?

    http://www.warbirds.in/crashes.html

    in reply to: Strange Air Forces: Royal Malaysian Air Force #2264479
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    2. In recent times, major defence purchaces were based on improving existing bilateral ties, transfers of technology and industrial offsets; these were the main factors in awarding contracts; that’s why the RMAF has several fighter types…

    Sounds very similar to the indian process, which explains the numerous types in that airforce as well.

    The decision to order 18 Su-30MKMS in 2002 was never due to an outstanding debt.

    First of all, back in 2002 the RMAF never wanted Su-30s, what it wanted was the Super Hornet.

    Unless it is forced to, the RMAF will never get another Russian made aircraft.

    Some very interesting detail there. So why did the SH deal never work out and what was then the reason to opt for a customized Su-30? Why has the RMAF now decided against Russian purchases and what other sources are they considering?

    in reply to: USAF facing a capability cliff by 2030? #2264576
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    Here is my thoughts on the matter:

    Pilot skill is perishable and if the US intends to maintain its fighter pilot proficiency then it needs to find a stop gap measure. Meanwhile, in China, around the same time, hundreds of J-7s, many still in relatively decent shape are slated to retire. Here we have a Supply and Demand match, although politically cannot be accepted BUT – a bit of refurbishment and some changes could allow for a 5 year lease to the USAF. A win-win for everybody, the USAF keeps its force structure intact, China gets rid of old fighter planes and some smart chap who makes the deal happen gets a ton of gold. Later, the planes can be demilitarized and sold to civilian customers worldwide.

    And you wonder why no one takes you seriously?

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #1996246
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    I would say much better 😀 why

    1. It is first time India is trying to build an aircraft carrier.
    2. Steel was cut with most probably two sheets, as dock yard had waited for almost 4 years before local steel was produced and handed over.
    3. IAC will have planes as compared to Queen Elizabeth

    It’s quite easy when you copy a Russian design and ask the Italians for “consultancy work” .

    in reply to: Rebuild the Sri Lankan Air Force :D #2265665
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    Not unless they want to be lacking for what they need when they need it.

    Could, woulda, shoulda is the cry of those who lost the battle, not the winners.

    If you do not have it, but find out that you need exactly what some one else said you do not, letting others tell you what you need has just rewards.

    A lot of soldiers died in “Nam because some paper writer decided that those who actually have to fight wars did NOT NEED x,y and z in his narrow minded self-centered little world.

    Using that logic, every country, no matter how big or small, how rich or poor, should have nuclear weapons…you know, just in case. However, in reality and using a little common sense, things are a little different.

    IIRC, at no point during the conflict did the Sri Lankan airforce need to intercept and destroy any fast jet fighter that the Tamil Tigers never had. At the most, the Sri Lankan airforce intercepted and destroyed a handful of light prop planes that the Tamils acquired, and even then it was a one sided affair, they could have easily done the job with something like the K-8, let alone Kfirs and J-7s. If in the unlikely event Sri Lanka faces a much larger and more heavily armed opponent in the region, and realistically that can only be India, then there is no conceivable way Sri Lanka would ever be in a position to take on said opponent using conventional means anyway. Which brings me back to the original point, perhaps Sri Lanka should invest in a nuclear weapons programme…you know, just in case.

    in reply to: Rebuild the Sri Lankan Air Force :D #2265891
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    Look at Ireland. Are they buying 10 Typhoons or Gripens?

    Fast jets are utterly useless. As for the 10 FC-1, they might as well buy PC-9 or 21s then. It would be cheaper, serve as trainers, and be sufficient for air policing.

    I was thinking along similar lines, perhaps supersonic jets are overkill. They already operate the K-8 (around 6 IIRC, but I’m sure they lost at least a couple in a Tamil Tiger raid a few years ago), which can be used for both training, and limited air policing and ground strike if the need ever arise again.

    What they need is determined by what they want.

    They are the only ones who know what is correct for them.

    Surely that should be the other way round, i.e. what they want is determined by what they need?

    in reply to: Indian Navy : News & Discussion – V #1996414
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    If by your bad luck you are a muslim then expect them to throw you in jail,call you a terrorist and then throw away the key.

    So much for the largest “democracy” then.

    in reply to: Cold war prototypes that didn't make it #2274308
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    I’ve never understood the hype surrounding the Lavi, essentially it’s just an F-16 with the tailplane and wings redesigned into a canard/delta layout. In what way was it better than the Viper?

    in reply to: Two JF-17 vs One Su-30MKI #2238507
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    its a ratio, not actual unit number.
    the idea is that jf-17 is supposed to out number the flankers.

    Well, even on this point, it seems you’ve got it wrong. The PAF is supposed to get anything between 150-250 JF-17s, while the IAF is expected to induct close to 300 Su-30MKI, so the JF-17 was never meant to outnumber the Su-30MKI by 2 to 1, if anything, it’s the other way round, 2 Su-30MI for 1 JF-17! lol

    in reply to: Two JF-17 vs One Su-30MKI #2239937
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    That ACIG website is quite different from Indian official claims. What is its source of information?

    Yes, it is very different from Indian official claims. The sources are given on the ACIG site.

    This is an accident database. How does it prove PAF has had upper hand in its encounters with IAF?

    Have a closer look at that pro-Indian site. It gives ALL losses, both attrition in peacetime and war losses. Scroll down to the bottom of each page and hit “next 50” in the bottom right hand corner. You can go through and see for yourself both accident losses and war losses.

    in reply to: Two JF-17 vs One Su-30MKI #2240046
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant
    in reply to: Question about Instantaneous Turn Rates #2240058
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    The problem with Saudi pilots, Viper and Eagle alike…

    The Saudis don’t operate the Viper, but I agree with some of your sentiments, the Royal family seem to hold much sway in terms of recruiting individuals to important roles, despite their abilities, or lack thereof. Nepotism is a major factor in Saudi society, good and bad. I’m sure if the Saudis could, they would hire foreign pilots, in a similar approach to other sectors of society. However, national defence may just be a step too far to outsource, even for the Saudis.

    in reply to: Current Mirage III/5/50 Operations #2240142
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    A-Darter (Agile-Darter) is an agile within visual range AAM that is in the final process before induction next year.
    Perhaps SRAAM is more accurate, as it will have a range of about 20km or more.

    The only BVRAAM used by South Africa was the R-Darter (Radar-Darter).
    This was a joint project with Israel, with their missile called Derby, and South Africas called R-Darter.
    There are some differences as far as I know, as when the missile was mature, their paths diverged slightly.
    I’ve no idea whether Pakistan got any R-Darters.

    Currently, there is a new BVRAAM called Marlin, that is said to be almost ready for industrialisation, and that has within the last 2 months been offered to Brazil for joint production along similar lines to the A-Darter.

    The wings on the Pakistani Mirage III’s seem to be the original design, with the leading edge slot.
    This is not to say Pakistan didn’t get South African zero-timed wings though.

    When the Cheetah first came about, it was specifically said that it had a new wing spar, designed with 50% greater life than the original Dassault spar.
    It was specifically said at the time that part or all of the Cheetah upgrades were available for export to Mirage III operators.

    My mistake, I was indeed referring to the R-Darter and not the “A” model. I guess the mystery continues on whether the PAF managed to get any R-Darters. I know the PAF managed to acquire a significant amount of spares from Libya, France and Lebanon, but have yet to see any wing on their ROSE upgraded Mirages, other than the original wing design, so not sure if they also managed to get “zeroed” wings from other sources as well. Having said that, and considering the amount of time, effort and resources the PAF have committed to upgrading their Mirage fleet, they couldn’t ignore all the work that was done in SA, particularly in terms of structural life extension.

    Here is the ventral fairing/space on the Cheetah C that was originally allocated on the Mirage III to the rocket pack, or the extra fuel tank.

    In the Cheetah C, part of that space is used for chaff/flares/EW equipment, with an additional smaller fairing to the side. I’ve noticed a similar smaller fairing on the Pakistani ROSE upgrade.[/URL]

    Thanks for the great close-up pic. Indeed, the PAF ROSE Mirages also use a similar setup, with additional smaller fairings on the rear fuselage, as shown in the pic I posted on previous page. It’s quite remarkable how far the potential of the Mirage III/5 airframe was being pushed, and I still think it had plenty of life left in it. Some years ago, SAGEM was showing of an AASM capability on a PAF ROSE airframe, but not sure whatever happened to that. And the PAF Air Weapons Complex (AWC) was also working on an IRST for Mirages, but not sure how far this advanced or whether it was used as a sensor in a weapon.

    http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/7057/27197413007637811754742.jpg

    in reply to: Two JF-17 vs One Su-30MKI #2240177
    Alpha Bravo
    Participant

    A rather nonsensical thread, not sure how we can compare the JF-17/Su-30MKI on a one v one basis. In reality, they may never really meet in isolation of other sensor data fusion assets. It’s like comparing the outcome of Gripen against say the F-15.

    JF-17 is a stripped down fighter made for export by China. No wonder PLA-AF will choose J-10 over it.

    Not sure what you mean by “stripped down”, but the JF -17 project was always intended for export purposes only, a lightweight multirole fighter was never really needed by the PLAAF. The PLAAF have been steadily replacing outdated J-7s with the J-10s and Flankers. Besides, most of the avionics and weapons for the JF-17 are based on the J-10, e.g. SD10/PL12, KLJ-7/KLJ-10 etc. As to the PAF, I don’t think they take the threat of the Su-30MKI lightly, despite what a wannabe PAF fanboy may think. And I certainly don’t think they need accreditation from the likes of Chuck Yeager, the consistently higher kill ratios of the PAF against the IAF is testament to that.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 455 total)