I guess given Argentina’s economic situation, it’s the best they can do right now. It’s a pity there still aren’t any more low hour Mirage III/Vs around, they could have gone down a similar route as the PAF and upgraded them. I think the PAF has pretty much acquired any low hour airframes that were available around the world.
If the Argentinian’s had a little more resources available, I would have explored the idea of a hi/lo mix comprising ~25 Mig-35B (all twin seaters) and ~45 JF-17 Block-2. There would be significant synergy regarding engine maintenance and perhaps incorporate the same/similar radar/avionics/weapons package as the Mig’s into the JF-17s. For force multipliers, perhaps a few Erieyes or ZDK-03s, backed up by Il-78 refuellers.
Tejas will not be ready for war before end of 2015
NEW DELHI: Defence minister A K Antony last week expressed the hope that the indigenous Tejas light combat aircraft would finally get the final operational clearance (FOC) next year. But a hard-nosed “internal assessment” shows Antony’s dream will be shattered.
The single-engine Tejas, already 30 years in the making, will not become fully combat-worthy anytime before end-2015. “The reality is that the around dozen Tejas prototypes are barely flying a couple of sorties a day. The initial operational clearance ( IOC)-II has again already been pushed to November this year from the earlier June-July deadline. It will take at least 18 months from IOC-II to FOC,” said a source.
In fact, the foremost challenge before the new DRDO chief-cum-scientific advisor to the defence minister, missile scientist Avinash Chander, is to ensure the long-running, meandering Tejas project firmly heads towards completion because it’s absolutely critical for India to have its own home-grown fighter.
The Tejas LCA project was first sanctioned in 1983 at a cost of Rs 560 crore to replace the ageing MiG-21s. The overall programme will now cost upwards of Rs 25,000 crore if the naval variant, trainer and the failed Kaveri engine are also taken into account.
It was in January 2011 that Tejas got IOC-I, which was initially heralded as the “full and final IOC” by the combine of DRDO, Aeronautical Development Agency and Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd till better sense prevailed. The fighter can be certified as fully airworthy only after it passes the IOC-II stage.
But there are still “several basic problems” — leave alone complex issues — that continue to dog the fighter despite it having clocked over 2,000 flights. “Tejas still cannot taxi back after a sortie since its brakes have to be first cooled with compressed air. It has major fuel gauge inaccuracies. Moreover, its radome (radar cover) is defective with large electromagnetic signal losses,” said another source.
The light-weight Tejas will be ready to go to war only after the FOC, which will include integration of all weapons and other systems to ensure it can fire guns, rockets, laser-guided bombs and BVR (beyond visual range) missiles as well as undergo air-to-air refuelling.
IAF has earmarked the Sulur airbase in Tamil Nadu, near the Bengaluru HAL facilities where the fighter is being built, to house the initial Tejas squadron inducted in the IOC-II configuration to resolve “the expected teething problems”.
The force has so far ordered 20 Tejas in IOC-II configuration, with the American GE-404 engines, and another 20 in FOC. As per current plans, IAF will order six Tejas Mark-II squadrons (16 to 18 jets each), with the more powerful GE F-414 engines, once the fighter is combat-ready.
Agree with ink. A rather nonsensical thread; there’s no clear idea what is meant by a “medium” size airforce and what the operational objectives would be of said imaginary airforce. Most, if not all, “medium” sized nations don’t then go and build a “medium” sized airforce, but rather take into account their monetary resources, operational objectives and perceived threats within their geopolitical environment. Take a look at a dozen or so “medium” sized nations and you’ll see a wide range of airforce size, structure and capability.
T-129 ATAK
^^ Love the cool retro Airwolf theme tune in the T-129 video 😎 One of my favourite TV shows as a kid.
Definitely not from the Middle East. That place is American and Russian territory. Sri Lanka might be a potential customer :eagerness:
Depends what country in the Middle East. I think Egypt could emerge as a potential export customer of the JF-17 in the future given that it already produces the K-8E and has operated the J-7. However, given the political and economic uncertainty over recent years, it may take longer than expected. Geopolitics may also come into play, given the military relations and aid from the US, but I think the EAF may be keen to have a BVR/light multirole platform free from the restrictions that relationship brings.
AlphaBravo, Thanks on the update.
You’re welcome, but I only really gave my own opinion, can’t really speak for the PAF. My own interests come from following the good work that Alarn Warnes (former editor of AFM) does on reporting about more regional airforces around the world. His book about the PAF, which came out a few years ago, is a good read, but admittedly, conditions have changed somewhat since the book was released.
I think the 14 F-16A/B with the USN were deemed to have too much wear due to their role as aggressor training, and were not worthy of upgrade. The other 14 A/B aircraft were used in a less fatiguing role with a USAF test and evaluation squadron, so were taken up by the PAF.
Regarding the option to exercise an additional 18 Block 52 C/D, that largely depends on how well the economy improves and the availability of funds. I think the PAF would like to have them.
Regarding the J-10B, there were reports some years ago of the PAF signing a contract to acquire at least a couple of squadrons by 2015-16, so these may yet materialise. However, given the weaker economic conditions, may well be delayed or even cancelled altogether. The same applies to the induction rate of the JF-17, lack of funding is holding this up, so there may be delays in inducting further batches. I think the ROSE II/III upgraded Mirages, especially those with low flying hours acquired from Lebanon/Libya, will see service beyond 2015, as well as the latter model F-7PG with double delta wings. Older Mirages and F-7 aircraft will be removed by 2015 maybe. Again, it all depends on funding.
“On the other hand India has purchased mainly Russian Hardware. Which, has not turned out so well………..”
Turned out pretty well when they beat US supplied Pakistan, repeatedly 🙂 .
Depends what you mean here. The PAF achieved a 3:1 kill ratio against the IAF in 1965. They didn’t fair too well in 1971, but I believe still achieved higher number of kills against the IAF.
Sorry, but could You please explain where this version is more stealthy than the current serial version, which already has a DSI !!!????
I was being sarcastic in reference to the fanboy postings of “Goldust” and “PLA-MKII”, who seem to think the JF-17 is uber awesome, and that having a DSI automatically makes it the most advanced thing flying since the F-22! 🙂
Joking aside, I don’t how reliable these images are, but it may be the case that CAC/PAC are working on including some RCS reducing features and perhaps some redesign of the LERX/fairing and landing gear assembly, similar to what SAAB have done with the Gripen NG (see the pics above).
It has what is called a hybrid with 1 digital channel and 2 mechanical. From an article that was published in a Croatian magazine..
So a modern digital FBW could be provided if required, but so far no sign of that for JF-17 Block 2.
Yes, I’m fully aware that the JF-17 has a quadruplex digital FBW in pitch only, but analogue FBW in roll and yaw. But that isn’t the question I asked (almost 1 YEAR AGO!!). I was referring to whether it’s CG/CL are offset.
I’m getting tired of “Goldust” and “PLA-MKII” bringing the JF-17 into every thread, so here’s something for you guys to salivate over…a potentially new “stealth” version of the JF-17 spotted in a promo video on the PAC website…and it includes a DSI!! 🙂






The TWR is actually above 1, as I understand from a respected Pakistani source, but I admit I don’t have any links to prove that. On a different note, here is a limited comparison that may interest you: http://www.grandestrategy.com/2012/03/43939282-comparison-of-jf-17-other.html
I bet your so called “respected” source is some PAF fanboy from PakDef forum called “Munir”, but going by official specs, even the PAC website has the TWR at 0.95.
MiG-29K walkaround.
He says the Mig-29K is the only aircraft in India with digital FBW? What about Su-30MKI, LCA, Mirage 2000?
No many religions have morals because failure to live up to the morals has just reward for eternity.
If there is no action/reaction, there is no reason not to do anything.
If there is no after life, then only a fool does not get what ever thrills the one wants out of life.
Dead is dead, so do not worry about “after wards” go for it. The man with the biggest gun makes the rules. If one does not like the rules, eliminate the rules makers and make new ones.
That is the difference between religions that believe in after life and persons who think everything is the result of an accident where ones comes out of nothing and returns to nothing.Makes me wonder why atheists are such pansies that then drop their pants and squat for powers that be.
Get some balls and change the world, absolutely nothing to lose as life is only as good as one lives it
Better short and glorious than long boring years of having to drop one’s pants and squat when ever told to, as the atheists do now.Hell, Satanists have more balls but then that is just another religion.
Well, you could argue that the Catholic and Orthodox churches simply “dropped their pants and bent over” for the powers that be during the early 20th century in the face of Atheist powers like the Nazis and Communists. Didn’t really see much “balls” from the organised religions then, nor during the religious sanctioned hundreds of years of African slave trade, so much for the higher morals of the religious authority.
Most of the Western world is moving away from religiously derived moral codes and moving towards a more humanistic approach of organising their societies, with practising religion on the decline and rising atheism.
You are ready to ignore minorities, because they are not muslims…
No, I simply highlighted the fact that you ignored the popular sentiment of Kashmiris. If Kashmir was given the right to choose its own destiny, the overwhelming decision would be for complete independence, from both Pakistan and India, which is why the current status quo suites both countries. And please read my post more clearly, this is what I said…
As I’ve said before, Pakistan, India and China are not really concerned with addressing the right of self determination of ALL Kashmiris, no matter what their ethnicity or religion.