Royal International Air Tattoo, held at RAF Fairford. I prefer RIAT, it’s only military rather than the commercial feel of Farnborough.
New Zealand gave up on fast fighter jets as part of its air force decades ago.
I see Saab and Sweden being the likely candidates to join forces with team Tempest, they’ll need to move on from the Gripen at some point and I don’t see them either going it alone or jumping on the F-35 bandwagon.
That schematic of the RR engine shows what appear to be bypass tubes aft of the fan stage, although it seems these are part of the active heat management system, probably feeding fresh bleed air into the gap between the inner and outer casing of the engine, shown in the figure. I also quite like how the electric motors are integrated in line with axis of the engine, rather than as an accessory appendage. Would be interesting to hear more details about the ‘electric’ power element.
I wonder if synergies can be achieved with the TFX, given that BAE is also heavily involved with that project too. Although clearly the requirements between the RAF and TAF will differ considerably, I can’t help feeling there should have been some consideration given to the TFX project used as the basis; however, if any of the reports are to be believed, the REPLICA/FOAS is being used as a basis for the TFX in itself. Seems like another Typhoon vs Rafale story in the making. Is there potential for any other nation outside the EU as a collaborating partner on the Tempest?
The girl is clearly Photoshopped into that picture, look at the quality of the background image of the Y20 compared with the foreground pic of the girl.
Interesting, the Israeli Rampage AGM seems to be yet another aero-ballistic missile concept, similar in vein to the recent Russian Kinzal and the Chinese CM-400AKG. Although with a range of 150km, significantly less than the Kinzal and the CM-400AKG, one wonders what real capability is being offered here.
DSI has a speed limit. IIRC, fighters with DSI will not exceed Mach 2.0. Original J-10/10A with the vanila AL-31FN supposed to have reached mach 2.2 (I’ve heard as high as Mach 2.3) at altitude. The newer J-10B/C despite having more powerful AL-31FN variants, will not exceed mach 2.0. Max speed must be around Mach 1.8 maybe mach 1.9. Su-57 is supposed to be a high speed fighter (Mach 2.5+). It has variable inlets.
Doesn’t the J20 achieve over mach 2.0 with its DSI?
It still looks like an F-16 in a delta/canard disguise to me.
If the Chinese really want to upset everyone, they should put out a VTOL UCAV model. The merde will hit the ventilator.
Why would that be the case? What’s so special about a VTOL UCAV?
This has long been vapourware, seems like they’re going ahead with it. What role would it play, recon, attack?
All production J-20s whether demo flights/flypast or aggressive training with other PLAAF aircrafts appear to carry Lunenberg lenses. Even the later prototypes (especially #2017) used Lunenberg lenses. These are very young birds and early days for the PLAAF when using 5th gen aircraft and they will do everything to hide its true RCS. There were rumors (from SDF?) that J-20 had to use Lunenberg lenses even when going up against aggressors comprising of KJ-500 and J-10B as well as ground based assets including S-300. And these newly released footage suggests that maybe true. PLAAF will be extremely protective of the J-20 and will not be risking it near the border of any country without masking its RCS. They might (stress the might) fly near a border of a country if the RCS is heavily masked and their motive was to test the J-20 passive senors. J-20 is packed full of senors of varying types with 360 degrees. It is a signal sucker/leech. Any aircraft that flashes its radar at the J-20 probably compromised itself by doing so. But again the PLAAF is unlikely to risk the J-20 flying near borders of other countries. They will first use it against J-10B/C, J-16, Su-35, KJ-500, KJ-2000, etc extensively before sending it out on risky mission. It will take the PLAAF years to develop tactics for 5th gen warfare. I mean how long did it take the USAF to adapt to the F-22?
My thoughts exactly. There’s no way the J-20 would have flown close enough to the indian border, or any other border, without some form of attempt at masking its true RCS, i.e. with a Lunenberg lens or something similar. The J-20 has appeared with the Lunenberg lens almost every time when flying against other platforms in DACT, or when flying in non-restricted public airspace. I don’t even think they would fly the J-20 near an adversary border, even at this early stage, in an attempt to test its passive sensors. They could readily simulate and test this without taking that risk.
J-20 with Lunenberg lens…must be the ones allegedly picked up by indian radars.
So how come the Russians didn’t develop the Kamov design and sold it to the Chinese instead?
