dark light

D1566

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,720 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • D1566
    Participant

    I think that Scotavia was referring to non commercial activity.

    That would tend to exclude ‘ship etc of any type’ I would have thought.

    D1566
    Participant

    And also consider that you can take a boat/ship etc of any type to sea without any licence and take passengers!

    That’s a new one on me; I could have sworn that I had a Department of Trade certificate of competency … as had everyone else in a position of responsibility on ever ship I sailed on.

    in reply to: Blue Skies Russ Snadden #790969
    D1566
    Participant

    RIP.

    in reply to: Shoreham Investigation Update #792108
    D1566
    Participant

    What about closing this thread, not until Friday but until Monday as a mark of respect for the victims of this disaster?

    Cannot help but agree with this. It would also give everyone a chance to read and absorb and reflect without just posting the first impression they pick from the report.

    in reply to: Another one bites the dust #792268
    D1566
    Participant

    Interesting…

    I was disappointed to see recently when he arrived somewhere by helicopter, that it was a conventional one, rather than a Dyson one without rotor blades like his fan!

    Wouldn’t a Dyson Helicopter be a Harrier? 🙂

    in reply to: The Mighty Eighth #796203
    D1566
    Participant

    How nice it would have been, just once, to see a B24 Unit featured.

    Moggy

    You would have thought that they might have picked up on Jimmy Stewart’s command of a B-24 group for a storyline?

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #796495
    D1566
    Participant

    Looks good. Any thoughts on the F-CRB codes?

    in reply to: Marauder 41-31585, what happened? #800662
    D1566
    Participant

    Feathering the engines is the WORSE thing to do. A feathered prop can act like a plow blade and dig in, ripping engines and wings off. A blade in take off pitch will fold back with minimal damage to the engines and airframe

    Surprising. Any instances of this?

    in reply to: Are These Aircraft Parts I Have Found? #802108
    D1566
    Participant

    I will return to it tomorrow morning. If you’re curious I made an imgur album with all the photos I took of these parts:

    Thanks for sharing the photos; a great find. Must get myself back there sometime soon.

    in reply to: WW2 crash – Thatcham, Berks – FW190 or ME109 #802604
    D1566
    Participant

    Could it have been a stray V1?

    in reply to: Nimrod MRA4 Survivor (well sort of…) #803680
    D1566
    Participant

    Grimrods were built using the pounds, shillings and pence formula….. Metric indeed :p

    1.5mm = 0.060″

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #803893
    D1566
    Participant

    Still awaiting sight of the original print.

    Mark

    Ah, hope that happens.

    in reply to: Spitfire Query. #803962
    D1566
    Participant

    No further info on this mystery?

    in reply to: WWII bomber guns versus fighter guns? #804756
    D1566
    Participant

    Flying Vampires & Meteors, would you have been at a disadvantage given (I suspect) the slow to respond early jet engines compared with a piston engined fighter?

    Didn’t they soon realise that keeping speed up was the way to use the advantages of the early jets?

    in reply to: WWII bomber guns versus fighter guns? #804760
    D1566
    Participant

    Hats off to all of them but especially the chap who did it from Blenheims.
    (Edit; it seems that a number of his claims were as Radar Operator, still a fine record though.)

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,720 total)