dark light

RSM55

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 304 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2035621
    RSM55
    Participant

    Obviously the same works in reverse. It serves the Russians just as well to confirm that they’ve never gotten anywhere near a track on a US, UK or French SSBN for the same reason.

    Some guys I know in the Russian North got some nice distinctions (just medals of course, not orders – nothing heroic there 😀 ) just for that 😉 But they won’t speak about it (i.e. range, conditions, time of the year, depths, speed etc.).

    under certain circumstances, Akula-1’s discretion rate was no real improvement over Vic-III. It being pointed out that Vic-III wasnt a bad boat by any stretch.

    Of course it wasn’t. And it’s quite logical that under certain conditions, an Akula-I is almost as noisy as a V-III – but these conditions normally have to be avoided at all costs 😉

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2036374
    RSM55
    Participant

    So do the 1st Lada have Fuel Cell AIP ?

    No.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2036401
    RSM55
    Participant

    What is the problem with the first Lada ? are they equipped with fuel Cell AIP system ?

    No.
    Their primary problem is the new BIUS and combat management system.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1817281
    RSM55
    Participant

    Bulava to resume static and land-based tests

    RIA Novosti quotes the Dept. MoD Gen. of the Army V. Popovkin (head of the Armaments Directorate) as saying at the IDEF-2009 exhib. that the Bulava SLBM will undergo extra testing on its land-based test range and some static tests (reliability testing), as the latest failure was due to a manufacturing fault. After these tests, the flight test programme will resume in June-July (from the Dmitry Donskoy as a platform). 5 launches from the D.D. are planned for 2009.

    in reply to: Russian Space & Missile[ News/Discussion] Part-3 #1817302
    RSM55
    Participant

    In the end the cat is out of the bag, and as long as “the other side” has strategic nuclear weapons not having an equal capability would open all kind of nice blackmail scenarios.

    I can’t imagine Russia agreeing to dismantle its strategic weapons while keeping the tactinukes. If some kind of traitor will not be elected president of the RF, of course 😀

    remember the USSR’s INF betrayal/SS-23 controversy.

    Oh yeah, I remember 😀 All the attempts to push the SS-23 out of the 500 km max range were total failures, finally Gorbi just decided to scrap them for getting an extra amount of US applause.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion Thread Part II #2036424
    RSM55
    Participant

    This effectively means more delay to second and third Lada and a farewell to RuNavy plans for 8 Ladas till 2015.

    Not necessarily, as the Ladas are built in another part of the shipyard and quite a few other shipyards can build them as well.
    Besides, the RuN never had real plans to have 8 Ladas by 2015 – let them cure the illnesses of the first boat first…

    in reply to: PLAN News, Photos and Speculation #3 #2036473
    RSM55
    Participant

    Varyag is being moved somewhere…

    http://www.china-defense-mashup.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/vayrag2.jpg

    RSM55
    Participant

    To finally answer the topic question:
    Because international treaties ban it.
    You’re not the first person to have thought about placing ICBMs on merchant vessels, lake subs, internal water assets… 😀

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2037912
    RSM55
    Participant

    I’m not really understanding this; as I believed the malfunction was an accidental activation of the fire extinguisher, not something resulting in actual damage to the submarine itself. How can it cost them one billion roubles to rewire the fire suppressant system? Or has something happened since?

    You are right. And apparently, it was not the system that malfunctioned, but a sailor’s brain 😉
    On the other hand, might be that India does not want to accept a sub without a foolproof (literally) fire extinguising system. So the Russians might have to back-engineer it to their own (older but obviously safer) standards.

    On the other hand, it might be some kind of industrial/lobby/regional interests issue, or some local officials want more bucks, as usual 😀

    As the second Akula for India is just a myth, regardless what some believe, it won’t be good for Russo-Indian relations in any case.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2037952
    RSM55
    Participant

    In worst case we may just lease a Virginia class SSN now that India and US are strategic partners 🙂

    Good joke 😀
    Especially when you look at what “strategic partnership” means nowadays… If it meant anything Russia would lease Akulas to China…

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2037960
    RSM55
    Participant

    Nerpa is the property of Russia and they would be paying for any extra cost involved with its repair

    I suppose so. But if the Russians don’t “repair” it (it’s probably the costliest ventilation ever 😀 ), India will not get it.
    Look like blackmail to me.

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2037962
    RSM55
    Participant

    Well we can get the other Akula class one.

    Which one? 😀

    in reply to: Indian navy – news & discussion #2038114
    RSM55
    Participant

    Look like the Nerpa deal will be delayed ad infinitum…:(

    Nerpa repairment costs will amount to a billion rubles

    According to INTERFAX quoting Viktor Ishaev, the Khabarovsk region governor, returning the Nerpa to service will cost at least one billion rubles. Ishaev was in turn quoting figures from the military.
    http://www.lenta.ru/news/2009/04/06/nerpa/
    (in Russian).

    in reply to: questions #1818647
    RSM55
    Participant

    Youtube is your friend: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z03y04imhQg
    This is the famous test were there was a bet that the missile will hit the left engine, to prove how accurate it is. The aircraft is Tu-16.

    Yep, now that I’ve seen the vid, it’s quite obvious.

    in reply to: questions #1818650
    RSM55
    Participant

    I have a little question concerning this sequence:
    Is the target aircraft a TU-16, and the fired missile a Vikhr ?
    (Is the aircraft flying or is it just attached ?)
    Thanks in advance.

    Difficult to say without the vid. Most certainly not a Tu, but a trainer of some sorts (L-39?). The missile leaves a corkscrew trajectory indeed, but it could be some kind of visual distortion. The gear might be lowered to simulate a low-speed target.

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 304 total)