dark light

Avo17000

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Chinese News, Photos, and Speculation #10 #2533757
    Avo17000
    Participant

    this is PLAAF you are talknig about…
    The chinese names are not the same as USAF…

    there is no distiction in PLA vs PLAAF in the designation of squadron/battalion
    they are all called (dadui)

    here is example of PLA organization
    detachment (zhidui). battalion (dadui). or company (zhongdui)

    This is organic to all Chinese armed forces. In other words PLA, PLAAF, PLAN , PAP,and the Police have the same unit designation of Dadui…

    Dude, you got this wrong…
    In a PLAAF fighter regiment, we will see:
    FeiXing ZhongDui: usually 4 ships, equivalent of USAF 4-ship flight
    FeiXing DaDui: usually 2x ZhongDui
    FeiXing Tuan: usually 3x DaDui.
    There you get 24 ships per Tuan, i.e. a regiment.
    From there you can have 3 Tuan to form a division. The division could be fighter/bomber/transport/whatever. They do not have anything like composite wing or USAF style AEF yet.

    In PLA regular army, you will find the ‘normal’ organization as you can see in any other army in the world:
    squad (Ban) – platoon (Pai) – company (Lian) – battalion (Ying) – regiment (Tuan) – brigade/division (Lu/Shi)

    However, the armed police is a slightly different story. The armed police is part of the armed force, not civilian police (public security). They are sort of like the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs, plus a bunch of other things…

    Anyway, let’s not go too far here, this is an aviation forum.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2677001
    Avo17000
    Participant

    It is REAL

    Yes it is real and the pictures are all over Chinese military forums.
    Though very short the video was on CCTV. Many people have seen
    it.

    😮 😮 😮

    Graphics experts!! Start analyzing! Someones sick PS joke? Or CCTV offcially confirmed this baby??!!! (Or anything else?? :confused: )

    http://img64.exs.cx/img64/3628/46_18081_1.gif

    http://img85.exs.cx/img85/5452/46_18081_10.gif

    http://bbs.china.com/images/2004-11-15/1100532244Image1115-2309TV68.jpg

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2677110
    Avo17000
    Participant

    didnt CAC privately fund the construction of a J7 with a chin intake similar to that used on the US A7s? that might be what the article was refering to when it said a J7MF already flew.

    i have seen some pics of it, but never saved any cos i thought the design was ugly, but now i cant seem to find the webpages. 🙁

    Well Factory 132 did test fly a chin intake J7. It was called J7FS, F as the proposed model following ‘E’, S as Chinese ‘ShiYan’ or ‘experiment’ in English. It was modified from a 132 owned J7II. The chin intake was ugly alright. :diablo: But consider this: 132 gave it nothing else but a new forward fuselage. You can’t really complain the looking of a test and evaluation vehicle. Apparantly J7FS evolved into the J7MF, which obtained a fixed canard, double delta wing, new engine, etc, etc.
    I don’t know how someone could confuse a FS with a MF. They look very different.

    in reply to: China's news, pics and speculation thread part deux #2677346
    Avo17000
    Participant

    J7MF project is dead

    Hmmm … I know that there are some persisted rumours that the J-7MF already flew … or is it still another mistake from FLIGHT International ???

    Deino 🙂

    Or I shall say it has never been seriously persued. J7MF concept was proposed by Factory 132 (not Institute 611 or someone else. you guys
    know the difference, right?). They have conducted some wind tunnel tests
    but that’s it. PLAAF never had any interest nor did any potential foreign
    customer. The project was quietly dropped.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)