dark light

cypherus

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 316 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: One Year On . . . Canberra WF922 plus Exhibiting #1253585
    cypherus
    Participant

    Having had the dubious pleasure of takng the public for a quick up round and down I do know the pleasure this can bring them and in return yourself, however I also know the cost of the inadvertent damage that can be caused even by the most considerate, from cracked instrument glass to broken canopies and switch gear, so while it might be a consideration as a method to add value to a public visit such things have to be very carefully managed and even then preperations to cover the costs of over worked equipment made, if this can be done then live cockpit fests are a must have, if not a simple walkway over looking the office is as near as most folks should ever be allowed to one.

    in reply to: Falklands Commemorative Flypast 17 June 2007 #1254986
    cypherus
    Participant

    Government cost saving measures for the RAF current in flight refueling strategy to fulfil requirements will now consist of a fleet of Cessna 152’s each carrying two ‘Erks’ equiped with a jerry can of bang juice and a stirrup pump fitted with a long hose….. :diablo:

    in reply to: hmm Hastings #1257508
    cypherus
    Participant

    This thread has made me recall comments from my old flying instructor, a former Beverley pilot, he often commented that they used almost as much oil as fuel and that he was always in constant amazement they did not take to flames on a regular basis from the amount of the stuff sloshing around… :diablo:

    in reply to: Falklands 25th Flypast #1260593
    cypherus
    Participant

    Dunno about Harriers but the 558 crew are working hard to ensure she is right up there with the rest, And to prove it they have just upped the stakes by starting what will be a nine man night shift over the next two weeks or so to complete the corrosion repairs, undercarriage bay rebuilds and fuel line installations.

    in reply to: Falklands 25th Flypast #1261414
    cypherus
    Participant

    The executive hereby and for always to be address as ‘The H & S’ after due deliberation, several meetings and a Pork pie feels that it is required to make a statement regarding the proposed but not yet agreed too celebrations, such statement should in no regard be taken as an agreement or understanding of an agreement, in fact or otherwise that may be construed to be an agreement other than the Pork Pie was stale.

    The Statement.

    All devices, whether powered by single or multiple power plants, will without the constant support of the medium know to all as Terra Firma, eventually return to said terra firma no matter how much maintenance, money and luck are applied to them, However it is the manner of that return that is uppermost in the minds of the H & S appointed wooden top brigade who state with conviction that said devices must arrive back on Terra firma at a point of their choosing and no other, any deviation from this edict will be regarded with grave suspicion and a very long winded and costly worded letter will be drafted too suitably admonish the drivers of the infringing devices for there total disrespect being paid to the office of the H & S by not arriving at the designated point on Terra Firma as dictated by the H & S. Such disrespect will be regarded as a Crash, while exhibiting respect for the H & S will of course earn the award of a Landing, it is hoped that all drivers of devices employed will strive to earn the award of Landing however it is also hoped that the drivers will not abuse this award and commit too many landings as the costs involved in awarding these awards may result in the H & S considering that a Crash is more cost effective than an award for Landing.

    This statement is to be included in an as not yet agreed document which when agreed will constitute the rules in regard to the ‘Driving of Pork pies over urban areas’

    Issued from the back office of the establishment hereby known as the H & S.

    in reply to: Vulcan v SHAR in the Falklands. #1263878
    cypherus
    Participant

    Read through all of this topic out of interest when I saw the Vulcan connection, ripping stuff, all of it, though to date though times change currently any Uk dependency could be taken and held by a bunch of off watch OAP’s in zimmer frames, Still maybe Browns forcast £400 million hand out to the military will mean they at least have one boat row away in.

    Sad thought really that while this country could at least once have put together the means to defend it’s shores and dependencies, today we would be hard pressed to find the money to call anyone about a problem abroad.

    in reply to: Maroochydore Dump #1282448
    cypherus
    Participant

    Have dived a few of those that did not make it back across the channel, out of the four that we looked at and this is over ten years back now a hawker typoon was the only one with any recognisable features, a fortress off beachy head was the last one, torn too shreds now and apart from a single engine nothing in situ though it ditched intact and the crew rowed ashore according to our guide, most of whats left laying around crumbles to dust if touched, Sea Water and airframes is not a good mixture.

    in reply to: Maroochydore Dump #1283480
    cypherus
    Participant

    I have seen in recent months documentary clips showing RN types unceremoniously shoving perfectly serviceable airframes, Corsairs/RN markings and the like, over the side of some unnamed carrier, no other explanation was given other than this was being done as a stipulation of the lend lease agreement and apparently involved a fair number of aircraft, it did not indicate were this took place or when, however considering that a large number of surplus airframes ended up parked at various locations in Australia it would be of no surprise to find the RN collecting same and tossing them overboard off the Queensland coast, Old chestnut or not even if they had been located it would be doubtful unless conditions were exactly right that anything at all was worth the costs involved in salvaging these airframes, probably cheaper to buy one off the US racing circuit and rebuild it back too original spec.

    in reply to: Lightning XR724 (2007 thread) #1287885
    cypherus
    Participant

    Dunno, but I lived in one of those things for a good number of years, very cozy it was too. :diablo:

    in reply to: Notholt Spitfire on pole #1292523
    cypherus
    Participant

    Nope, definte location central main building forecourt area between Building and main security fencing, mounted nose high left wing low gear up flight attitude, four blade prop, looks a new location to me as not noticed it before in hundreds of drive pasts. 😀

    in reply to: installing addon scenery #223651
    cypherus
    Participant

    Don’t know were you got the scenery package from, but if it’s from AVSIM, normally the install instructions are included.

    Avsim is wel worth a look. http://www.avsim.com/

    in reply to: UK Control Towers – Health Check #1298471
    cypherus
    Participant

    Yup, Wittering has a tower, enter it into google brings you right down on top of it.

    in reply to: Ouchhh Antonov power Vs Casa-Bucker #1299258
    cypherus
    Participant

    Guess his mother never told him not to sit in a draft… :diablo:

    Good to hear he is Ok though.

    in reply to: Northolt Hangar Petition deadline 11 Feb #1304117
    cypherus
    Participant

    As I understand things currently in progress at Northolt, this will, subject to future as yet unannounced cuts to the affected services, lead to a number of currently remote MOD facilities being transferred to the Northolt airfield site, which will continue to also serve when required as an operational MOD airfield, building work is already well underway on some of the new facility buildings around the airfield.

    But this is not unusual for airfields to undergo modernisation so why the fuss really, the decision to demolish the hangars and associated buildings was made last summer as far as I can determine with the full blessing of the English Heritage previously tasked to review the proposals to this site and a number of others around the country, Sad to see the hangar go but at least the overall future of Northolt airfield has been secured for a number of years to come.

    in reply to: Dutch air museum. #1305303
    cypherus
    Participant

    very expensive and only good as static airframes with lots of work and many parts missing! I think the guy has a BMW dealership, this is his “hobby”.

    Ah, Hence the showroom appearance on some of them then, 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 316 total)