I had a look through this file, yesterday, and it may prove to be a disappointment for you. It’ll need more careful perusal, but most papers seem to concern European recipients of aircraft, and mainly the Ju-52 at that, with Norway and Sweden figuring most prominently. When I’ve had a proper look, I’ll let you know, but it doesn’t look very hopeful.

From the disrespect I saw from people while I was in the supermarket, despite them announcing the two minute silence, I don’t think it would mean a lot to many

You should have been at the IPMS show, on Sunday, at Telford; even though, for obvious reasons, it had to be two days early, nobody moved, or uttered a sound.
Can’t really go along with the idea of a holiday, though; holidays are for fun and relaxation, while today is a day for tears and reflection.

The Mark III fuselage, just as with the Hurricane II compared to the Mk.I, was 4″ longer than the previous (and subsequent Mk. V & VI) fuselages. This led to the u/c being raked forward 2″, simply by inserting a wedge between the pintle and the mainspar; this change was continued on the Vc and later Marks.
With the extra weight “up front,” it’s entirely possible that the oil tank was moved aft solely so as to minimise its effect on the CoG. Modifications to the Merlin 45 air intake meant that it, too, was slightly longer, but this was circumvented by turning the carburettor controls through 180 degrees, which tucked them under the engine, meaning it could still fit into the original Mk.I space, leaving the cowlings untouched.

If you miss it, there’s a second chance on BBC2 Thursday at 7.50a.m.

Or he could have posted them here to let younger readers put the crime into context. Emotions ran high on both sides.

It comes as no surprise to see you leaping to this creature’s defence, but it would be appreciated if you had the courtesy to read what was written. The existence of the chants is not disputed, just whether we really need, yet again, to read every word that was said. Some like to wallow in such nastiness; others don’t.

Someone mentioned having to read exam questions back then, very carefully. I do remember being tripped up like this and felt it was unnecessary. The questions were hard enough. What were they testing you on anyway, your maths or reading ability?

When we were approaching O-levels, our maths master went to great lengths to warn us to stick to the “proper” way to do the papers; he said that, due to the number of examinees, everybody was drafted in to help with the marking, even the canteen staff (I think he was joking, but we were very careful during our “mock” exams.)

Nice to hear you also have an imaginary friend, Edgar.

All of my friends are real, but you do love to assume whatever suits your particular agenda, don’t you?

So why bother to post, unless it is because you are following me about, debunking me. Are you my stalker as well as trying to be my god? Or maybe you fancy me

1/. Because somebody has to, otherwise you’ll continue to get ideas above your station. 2/- & 3/- Of all the nonsense you’ve spouted over the months, that has to be the most hysterically funny.

Don’t know if these are the correct answers]

I got the same for most, though, having rented all my life, I don’t really understand rateable value, so arrived at £1,780,000
I made the last one £135 (810 – 135 = 675 + 20% = 810.)