dark light

Edgar Brooks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Sun front page – severed head alert #1846626
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Tony, Charlie & CD, I’d like to point out that it’s refreshing to see that you obviously care more about a blatant case of child abuse than the behaviour of something that has only a passing resemblance to a newspaper, and a retail outlet. At least you seem to have your priorities in the right order.

    in reply to: Spitfire mirror variations #906750
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Thank you Edgar, is there a publication I could find that shows this? The on from 41 Sqn above shows a two-bolt side fixing, but others have 4 bolts per side.

    According to the leaflet, you need drawing 30030 sht 33, and it implies that you need to remove four already-fitted screws (2 x 6 BA & 2 x 4 BA,) then use the holes as a template to drill four holes into the mounting bracket 30030/541, countersink the 4 BA holes, then refit the bracket using 4 & 6 BA screws (not bolts) + nuts.

    in reply to: What's your headstone going to be like? #1846643
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    My (ex) Works Manager said he was determined to outlive me, so he could dance on my grave; my reply was “That’s good, because I’m being buried at sea.”

    in reply to: Spitfire mirror variations #907084
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Supermarine didn’t start to fit mirrors until September 1940, but there are stories of pilots going to the local car dealers, and getting their own (your Triumph items, perhaps?)
    In December 1940, a leaflet was issued, telling units how to fit their own, and it called for “26AJ/24855 Mirror, Desmo Type 44 (2 lug attachment.)”
    An “improved” mirror was introduced in December 1942 (sorry, don’t know the type) on all Marks, except P.R.

    in reply to: Prince William's new job #1846921
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Especially if he’s a republican.

    in reply to: Aircraft Compass Type P11 (6B/1672) #1846945
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    First, take it into a darkened room, and wait for a few minutes; if you can see the interior tubes, or any other part, glowing, you are likely to have a problem with radioactive paint, and all that entails.
    However, the dial, tubes, and cross-wires look so bright, it’s possible that it’s been “modernised” post-war, and the radioactive paint and powder (inside the tubes) has been replaced by fluorescent material. If so, you can relax (a little.)
    The bowl should be filled with industrial alcohol (which is poisonous,) which stops the internal spider from rattling around uncontrollably. If the spider rocks around, and (worse) you can hear it rattling, the bowl needs to be refilled with liquid, since, if it completely dries out, the internal paint could flake off.
    If the paint doesn’t glow, of its own accord, get hold of a u/v lamp, and shine it on the compass (again in a darkened room); if the paint, etc., reacts to the light, and glows, you have far less to worry about.
    If you push the curved lever forward, you’ll find that the black bezel should be free to rotate, the idea being that you turn it until the heading you want is “on” the small tube level with the foot marked “fore.” (It’s under “30” in your photos.)
    Then rotate the compass until the “inverted T” inside the bowl is lined up with “N,” and you are now flying your Spitfire (or whatever) along your chosen heading.

    in reply to: WHAT do you think, should be preserved?. #1847421
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Me

    in reply to: The weirdest song lyrics? #1847564
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Mares eat oats
    And Does eat oats
    And little lambs eat ivy.
    l

    A kid’ll eat ivy, too, wouldn’t you

    No, I wouldn’t.

    in reply to: The weirdest song lyrics? #1847577
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Mairzy doats

    in reply to: BS "BRISTOL STANDARD" PARTS ETC DRAWINGS REQUIRED. #924407
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The RAF Museum does have a lot of Bristol drawings, in its “MAC” range; they seem to be, mostly, for aircraft, but there are some with no designation. There are thousands of drawings, and they are not in a completely logical order, so prepare to spend some time in the library, going through them (60,000+, last time I looked.)

    in reply to: Instrument radiation? #929200
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Looks as though the Boscombe Aviation Collection better close down then,on a visit last year to their Old Sarum site we spent many enjoyable hours sat inside Canberra,Swift and Hunter cockpits.
    How far do we go with this, in Somerset it is well known there is background radiation that permeates into the atmosphere life is a risk we just need to be sensible.
    A couple of weeks ago I was in a position (the right hand seat) to carry out a practice display in a Hunter T7 above Duxford with the aircraft age 50 + and all that radiation some would say a risk too far.

    Post-war, instrument paint was changed from luminous to fluorescent (which isn’t radioactive.)

    in reply to: Instrument radiation? #929355
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Hmmmm Are any WWII Spitfire pilots still about having sat for the best part of a number of years in these radiated cockpits?

    And were they faced with instruments with damaged glasses, cases and seals, with 70-year-old deteriorating paint?

    in reply to: Instrument radiation? #929509
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    This is (or can be) an emotive subject, and needs input from those involved in the aircraft industry.
    Nearly nine years ago, I retired from working on aircraft instruments, and the company operated (and still operates) a strict policy of not touching any instrument to which their Geiger counter reacted above a certain level.
    The danger does not come from “radiation,” but from the paint itself; over years it deteriorates, and partially crumbles into a fine dust, and this shows up as apparently brown paint, often with black specks in it.
    If the glass is cracked, or chipped, or the case is cracked (and that’s very common, since many are made of Bakelite, which cracks in a heartbeat when screws are over-tightened,) or the rubber seal, under the glass, has perished (and rubber has only a 5-year CAA “life,”) there is the (albeit possibly slim) chance of you breathing in the dust, thereby getting non-degradable radioactive material into your lungs, with all that entails.
    If museums buy a Geiger counter, and supply visitors with dust-proof sprayers’ masks and over-suits, which can be destroyed after use, maybe 100% access might be regained, but don’t hold your breath.

    in reply to: WHAT Made You ANGRY Today? #1848554
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Funny, really, when you consider, only a few days ago, we were advised to get out more, since sunshine is the best way for us to absorb sufficient vitamin D.

    in reply to: Hypothetical, I kow, BUT? #1848677
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Accurate weather predictions (though it’ll probably take most of the 73 years before it happens.)

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 1,308 total)