dark light

Edgar Brooks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #285015
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Yes, but in the same context there are files from WW2 that still haven’t been released even after the 30 yr rule? is up.

    The “30 years” is actually the minimum, though there’s talk of it being reduced; I looked for a 1946 file, on behalf of someone, and found that it had a 75 year tag on it, and there are files (can’t remember them, now) with 100 & 150 year tags.
    During the 1970s an employee of the NGTE, at Farnborough, wanted to write the history of Whittle, but found that the technology was still secret, so she couldn’t access it. She went to the Science Museum, and found everything she needed in the children’s section.

    in reply to: General Discussion #284291
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    My answer… see/re-read #23. If things did become violent, I would shout/scream or do my level best to attract the attention of other people in the vicinity.

    Then watch them cross the road, to avoid “getting involved,” and possible prosecution by the “even-handed” CPS.

    Once the alarm on his phone had been raised, Mr Woodhouse could have simply called the police who would have attended to the scene and apprehended the suspects.

    Naivete thy name is Cloud9; on the only occasion when I needed to call the police (at 3.a.m. some nutter was hammering on the door, crying, “Let me in, let me in”) I was given an incident number, and told to call back, if things developed. They did (he started stripping off his clothes,) so I was given a second incident number, told to try to get some sleep, and never saw a hint of a police uniform. I now keep my garden fork in the hallway.

    in reply to: General Discussion #284299
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    As a child, I dreaded hearing my mother say, “We’re going to Oxford this afternoon,” since I knew this would mean being pulled away from looking at the delights of toyshop windows, while having to spend (seeming) hours, kicking my heels outside the windows of women’s clothing stores. My mother could never understand why I always wanted Oxford to lose the Boat Race, University cricket match, rugby match, anything.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283417
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    9.00 p.m., tonight, on Channel 5 “The Big Benefits Row: Live; now you can see what the self-proclaimed “experts” think.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283422
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The biggest problem is that far too many don’t, can’t, or won’t know the difference between “use before” and “best before,” and it’s vast.
    Whether the food is in a bin, or not, it remains the property of the store, until it leaves the premises (try walking out without paying,) so the question is fairly academic; rifling through bins, and taking the contents, is theft.

    in reply to: General Discussion #283177
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I predict that I shall fall asleep at some time during every race, just as I did last year, and the year before, and…………

    in reply to: General Discussion #283250
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Firstly, what’s wrong with tattoos? It’s just body art…

    Can’t speak for others, but, if I want to see moving pictures, I switch on the TV.

    however, I don’t think children are as influenced by their parents as people think. At least I never was.

    Well, I certainly was, and a brilliant piece of psychology, it was, too. When some of my friends had started experimenting with dried grass, corrugated cardboard, even tarpaulin (no, I didn’t,) my mother’s reaction was, “You can smoke and drink as much as you want to, my boy, but you’re paying for it.” With the cheapest cigarettes at 1/10d, and my pocket money being 2/6d, I much preferred the occasional bag of sweets; when I started work, and could afford it, I was no longer interested.

    in reply to: General Discussion #282795
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    So why is Beckham……? And who is Miami…? I think we should be told.

    He’s an ordinary working-class man, who has committed the unpardonable sin of being hugely successful in his chosen profession. He has already started up football academies in this country, and is planning the same in Miami, but, because he doesn’t “know his place,” he attracts calumny and jealousy from certain quarters; he should, of course, have quietly sunk into obscurity, and bought a failing pub, like so many other ex-footballers.

    in reply to: General Discussion #282645
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    He pretty much did. He was on TV when he arrived in LA several years ago, then he was on TV again when he announced his retirement from the LA Team… Never heard a damn thing about him between those two events…

    You mean he actually went ahead, and played football, instead of courting publicity? Sportsmen actually doing what they’re paid for; whatever next?

    in reply to: General Discussion #282558
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    =ZRX61;2111322That bint he married popped up on tv here a couple of times though.

    You know, I’m sure, if you tried really, really hard, you could, one day, find something inoffensive, even nice, to say about somebody.

    in reply to: General Discussion #282177
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    You missed the bit where a U.K. zoo offered to take him, but “regulations” wouldn’t permit even that.

    in reply to: General Discussion #274666
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Unsurprisingly (being male) you lot (mostly) don’t have a clue; she’s lost the love of her life, and all she gets is “Move On,” “Get on with your life,” and the worst, “You’ll find someone else.”
    Well, what if she is so devastated, she doesn’t want to find someone else; what if she desperately wants the child of her life’s love, and can’t feel ready (yet) to give it the love and devotion it’ll need?
    30-odd years ago, I watched a woman fall apart when she gave birth to a stillborn child; 5 years, and another (living) child later, her eyes would still fill with tears, when she looked into the bedroom where her three surviving children were asleep, saying, “There’s always that huge gap between them.”
    At her child’s funeral, an uncle came out with a typically crass “move on” type of comment, “Well, never mind; worse things happen at sea.” To that, her husband snarled, “Name one.”

    in reply to: General Discussion #274431
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I agree BUT the difference is, this IS a planned single parent family-the biological father will NEVER be there.

    Which is something the father must have considered, or he would never have made the donation; since he would have known his wife rather better than any one of us, including her qualifications for bringing up a child single-handed, what gives anyone else the right to put their interpretation on the situation? If she should say, “Mind your own business,” it’s no more than you deserve.

    in reply to: General Discussion #269495
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    “Dueto de los Gatos,” by Rossini; Google it, then listen to it, you’ll find it totally apposite.

    in reply to: General Discussion #268619
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Now, even if you live to be 120 you’ll get that £400 a month.

    I’ve been hoping that someone (preferably a pensioner, like me,) would add a little more clarification, but it looks as though it’ll have to be me. You won’t get £400, you’ll get £320 (if you’re lucky.)
    At retirement age, National Insurance contributions cease, but Income Tax doesn’t; the State Pension cannot be taxed (being an old cynic, I have a deep suspicion that this enables politicians to call their pension a State Pension, so that they avoid paying any tax on it.)
    Private pensions have no such provision, but the amount is actually added to the state’s payment, and tax is calculated on the whole amount, meaning that (if you’ve listened to the politicians, and provided for your retirement) you do pay tax on the State Pension, though the money, itself, is deducted from your private pension.
    The tax threshold, before you start to pay tax, is higher than when you’re working, but not above the amount you get from the state, which is probably why some say “Sod it,” and don’t bother.
    Since my retirement, the threshold was raised, annually, so that it neared the state pension amount, but that was stopped last year, so that this year I receive a whopping increase of £5 weekly, out of which I immediately lose £1, and, with a rent increase of £5 per week………
    And, before our Communist sympathiser jumps in, I haven’t forgotten that it was Brown’s bunch that did away with the 10% tax band, ensuring that the lower-paid lost more, in %age terms, than the rich bunch, and they claim to be the party of the working-class. :highly_amused:

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 1,308 total)