I have little time for her, a pushy self-publicist if there ever was one, but if she has the balls to give it a go good luck to her.
Have any of you ever met her? Unfortunately I haven’t, though a friend, when she worked as a child-minder, often did, as she had to look after Carol’s daughter. She says that, when she came to collect her daughter,she was just another “Mum,” with no side about her whatsoever, so maybe we shouldn’t always go by the public face?
My answer… see/re-read #23. If things did become violent, I would shout/scream or do my level best to attract the attention of other people in the vicinity.
Then watch them cross the road, to avoid “getting involved,” and possible prosecution by the “even-handed” CPS.
Once the alarm on his phone had been raised, Mr Woodhouse could have simply called the police who would have attended to the scene and apprehended the suspects.
Naivete thy name is Cloud9; on the only occasion when I needed to call the police (at 3.a.m. some nutter was hammering on the door, crying, “Let me in, let me in”) I was given an incident number, and told to call back, if things developed. They did (he started stripping off his clothes,) so I was given a second incident number, told to try to get some sleep, and never saw a hint of a police uniform. I now keep my garden fork in the hallway.
As a child, I dreaded hearing my mother say, “We’re going to Oxford this afternoon,” since I knew this would mean being pulled away from looking at the delights of toyshop windows, while having to spend (seeming) hours, kicking my heels outside the windows of women’s clothing stores. My mother could never understand why I always wanted Oxford to lose the Boat Race, University cricket match, rugby match, anything.
One of your first actions should probably be to get onto the National Archives website, access “Discovery,” and type in “minelaying” between 1939 & 1945. There’s at least 200 files, a lot of which is RN material, but there are also some “AIR” files, which could be useful. Then try variations of the theme, possibly with just “mine”; you have to get a bit inventive with Discovery, since the filing wasn’t necessarily done by ex-Service.
After Farnborough had rebuilt an Se5A, it was flown during the SBAC show, and fired its gun(s?) with the bullets going into a sandpit in front of the bigwigs’ tent.
Yes, but in the same context there are files from WW2 that still haven’t been released even after the 30 yr rule? is up.
The “30 years” is actually the minimum, though there’s talk of it being reduced; I looked for a 1946 file, on behalf of someone, and found that it had a 75 year tag on it, and there are files (can’t remember them, now) with 100 & 150 year tags.
During the 1970s an employee of the NGTE, at Farnborough, wanted to write the history of Whittle, but found that the technology was still secret, so she couldn’t access it. She went to the Science Museum, and found everything she needed in the children’s section.
“Barnes Wallis’ Bombs,” by Stephen Flower, is worth the investment; it contains a graphic, at times amusing, story of one pilot’s first delivery of a Grand Slam. ISBN 978-1-84868-959-6.
Watten, Wizernes, Siracourt, etc., “only” received Tallboys; Grand slams were used on post-war trials, which probably explains why so few survive, and there were plans to use them on the connecting bridges on the Japanese mainland, which is possibly why there are some in Pakistan.
A mod finally seeing sense and closing the God, Allah, Buddha thread!!
Make that two of us; began to think “courtesy” had been changed to “curse or three.”
And the sun is shining, the sky is clear
Unfortunately, in some lives (mine) a little (hah) rain must fall, and it’s shopping day.
What is ponzi anyway ?
Carlo Pietro Giovanni Guglielmo Tebaldo Ponzi, one of the biggest fraudsters known to man.
Why is it necessary that you have enemies? I don’t have any nor do any other atheists I know.
Probably just as well that (I assume) you never knew Stalin, Pol Pot, or Mao Tse-Tung.
Are you saying that eyewitness statements from long ago, from the Bible for example, are not 100% accurate?
No, I’m simply saying that I don’t know, and it’s invidious to expect otherwise, since neither does anyone else, unless they have seen the evidence, written down as the events unfolded. I’m quite happy to admit that I don’t know whether there is a god, or not, but I get intensely irritated when I’m confronted by others (for or against) who will move mountains to persuade me that they know best (even to the extent of getting increasingly personally offensive, abusive and foul-mouthed,) when I know, perfectly well, that they really know nothing, and are simply trying to browbeat others to accept their point of view.
Ah, I see, so eye-witness statements, from hundreds of years ago, have to be 100% accurate, but it’s perfectly acceptable to allow for mistakes in eyewitness statements of recent times.
The dead messages of dead religions have no bearing on life today; only what the proponents of those religions do now in the name of those religions matters…
…that is how we will judge these religions and their proponents.
Your statement is a contradiction in terms; if a religion is dead, it’s dead, there can’t be any proponents, otherwise it would be alive.
Unfortunately for all of the “modernisers,” religions don’t work the way they would like them to work; you can’t pick out the best parts, and discard those little inconveniences that mean that you can’t do as you like.
Exactly my point; the originators of a religion are usually all dead centuries ago…
But their message(s) isn’t/aren’t.
…what matters here, now, are a religion’s proponents. For all intents and purposes they are the religion.
Not if they refuse to follow the original creed, and go off on their own agenda.
So we should judge a religion on what it intended to do
Yes
or what its followers actually do in its name?
No, you judge the (not genuine) followers, for not behaving in the way expected of them.
Excuse me? A religion is its proponents!
No, it isn’t, it’s formed by its originators, in the case of Christianity, a man who lived 2000(ish) years ago, and inspired others to follow the same path; its proponents (and detractors) often misuse its messages, and intentions, twisting them to their own ends (our Bristolian friend is a classic example of this.) “Christians” have killed, and are still killing, in his name; Muslims are persuaded to commit suicide, while committing murder; the list goes on and on, but it isn’t the religion that’s causing the mayhem, it’s the greedy, grasping, manipulative hierarchy.
Yes, and sometimes there isn’t a ‘world of difference’.
Usually when the followers stick to the stated ideals, and treat others well.