I’m waiting for the plague of locusts
Try the Palace of Westminster.
Apparently, this time, the Saharan pollution is intermingled with European pollution which is all being blown here by easterlies; the European court is threatening to fine this country because of its high levels of pollution. I wonder if anyone else can detect any irony in that.
We’re living in the age where everyone has a phone with still and video capability.
No, we aren’t; my phone will make phone calls, and send text messages, but that’s all (and all I want.) And, looking further down, I use my real name, too.
And, this gentleman, from Burma, who you say sabotaged your aeroplane; do you have any evidence of that?
Being French, it was probably 19 metres.
And with children, outside, desperate to make sure they don’t fritter away their inheritance before they shuffle off.
Swans get a (largely undeserved) bad press; on my visits to Kew, I can walk within inches of swans basking on the warm concrete. Apart from keeping a wary eye on me, none has ever shown the slightest aggressive intent, in fact water-borne birds will swim towards me, in the hope I’ve got some food for them.
Several years ago, while on a canal-boat holiday, we were sitting in the stern having tea, when a pair of swans glided up, and proceeded to take sizeable chunks of our sandwiches, even coming close enough to take pieces direct from our fingers (their beaks are bony, but not sharp.) When they sailed off, obviously satisfied, we went below; 20 minutes later, we were disturbed by a sharp rapping on the hull, so went back on deck, to find the swans had returned, complete with brood, for us to feed as well. While the young wouldn’t trust us to feed them by hand, the adults circled them and us, obviously content to let us get as close as we liked.
The only parties that I can think of, in my lifetime, which spoke with one voice are the Nazis and the communists, probably because their “members” were dead if they didn’t toe the line. If someone isn’t allowed to express a personal opinion, however distasteful other individuals might find it, then several million Allied military and civilian personnel have died in vain.
Charlie, do you think it was inappropriately used in the case of William Henwood and his tweets about Lenny Henry? Be very careful.
Why? Are you planning to go round and beat him up, if he says yes? Or maybe get the thought police to come calling? Quite frankly, what he thinks is none of your business.
Who appointed you judge, jury, and executioner in all things political, may I ask? You trawl through the news, picking out controversial items, then sit back, inviting comment, while waiting to pounce on anyone who doesn’t share your jaundiced view of certain political parties/personalities.
Thanks to people like you, with their excreta-agitating behaviour, we can no longer even call a dog by his given name from 70 years ago.
Why, is that what you do?
Seriously that would never have entered my head; are you so wrapped up in violence that it is immediately what you thought? What does that say about you?.
Only that you delight in attaching labels to others, while having no evidence to support it.
Indeed, and you may defend his word with your life – but care still needs to be taken due to the Race Relations Act 1976 (et al) which outlaws discrimination on racial grounds and oversees relations between people of different racial groups. Telling somebody ‘of colour’ to go back to ‘another country’ on the basis of their ‘colour’ is frowned upon by law.
And bringing down the full majesty of the law onto someone simply for saying something is the behaviour of the bigot; if you can’t persuade, simply by the power of your rhetoric, someone of the wrongness of their behaviour, then leave the floor clear for someone who can.
Ho ho… Since my views are different to yours I must be the enemy – and that of all the right-thinking, decent, hard working man in the street too.
We thrive on discussion – but there needs to be discussion otherwise you will just go about discussing bloody Top Gear all s0dding week… My view is contrary to yours: therefore discuss why I am your enemy. Please?
Who said anything about enemies? You do not figure large enough, in my life, to assume such a mantle; there are far too many, on the net, who, like you, hide behind a pseudonym, make provocative statements, then, when someone reacts, produce the wide-eyed innocent “Who, me?” reaction, and continue to answer a question with more questions, solely with a view to getting an angry reaction.
Well done. You have worked out my game plan… I find a subject and try to kick off a discussion and one this one you bit!
Now, pick a subject of your own and discuss. Or would you rather sit there looking at a dead forum?
If it doesn’t include your “stimulating conversation,” most definitely. Not far from here is a thread, with a member desperately asking for help with a personal problem, to which you have made not a single addition (helpful or otherwise,) which lends weight to my conviction that you only enjoy stirring things up, and have no real interest in your fellow man.
(I can imagine you sitting there, foaming from the mouth, jabbing a finger at your monitor and hammering on the keyboard! Tell me I am wrong!!!)
:applause: Nice try.
And we can’t enslave people of a different ethnic minority, call them ‘monkeys’ and worse, we can’t lock up people of differing religious views for no reason anymore (although we can still invade their countries), we can no longer act like gods with power over life and death – just like we used to in places like South Africa and Rhodesia 70 years ago.
Please indicate where I’ve said that we should.
Just because these things used to happen, just because such names were used at one time, doesn’t mean that it was right then nor right now.
Just in case your education has been incomplete, do look back to the Latin word for black, and you’ll find that the word, to which so many object, is nothing more than an Anglicised version; are you planning to rewrite the Latin-English dictionary? Webster’s already been that route.
Do you call people that?
Never have, never will, even in response to provocateurs like you (and note that you were the one who introduced it)
The name you refer to was once common, but it is now regarded as offensive by the authorities and by ethnic minorities – explain to me why you think this word is no longer in common usage by decent, considerate people.
It was a common word to describe a particular shade of dye/colour, but its incessant use by the dregs of society, as a means to insult others, has made it unusable. Strange how the “f” word also used to be considered beyond the pale, so much so that I would never consider using it in front of a woman or child, yet the “entertainment” industry’s never-ending use has made it acceptable (though not to me – one example, and off goes the TV.)
Labels such as…?.
“I can imagine you sitting there, foaming from the mouth, jabbing a finger at your monitor and hammering on the keyboard!”
I was merely indicating that care needed to be taken; it was not me threatening Charlie, no matter what you might assume.
Ah, I see; it’s alright for you to assume something about me, but not the other way round.
My views are not the same as yours, nor many others here; I am well aware that I am kicking the status quo – hence enemy.
Opponent will suffice; as I said, you do not have enough status to qualify as an enemy.
maybe it is your own subconscious planting seeds in your mind – it is not mine.
Qualified psychiatrist, are you?
Maybe I have not made a post on there because there is nothing I can add that someone else has not already said, maybe his problems echo a situation of my own in the slightly less than recent past (a situation which I have no wish to ever go back to, what with having very little recollection and only the hearsay of others to refer to), the scars of which were not just mental…
And maybe a word from a fellow sufferer just might help a little, but let’s think only of oneself.
We all have had problems over the years – it is called life and it is something we have to deal with, one way or another. Some can ask for help from people they don’t know and others can not. Either way I wish him all the best; if there was anything I could do I would at the drop of a hat, but my own ‘lifeskills’ are not going to help him at this moment.
Can you say the same when you would happily offend a proportion of the country over the name of a black dog in 1943?
Yet another assumption; I do not “happily offend” anyone (I leave that to agitators like you.) I can, though, regret that misuse of the word has led to its fall from legitimate use.
Not really an answer though. Was I wrong?
Do stop stirring, there’s a good boy.
Just because it was once not offensive does not mean it is possible to reclaim it now – ask your black friends.
I already have; there are some of us who can discuss this with “them,” because they know I genuinely want to know how they feel.
I did not, nor would I, refer to you (even after your provocation) or anyone else by that revolting term.
Then why use a word you would never use, which has to be a classic case of double standards. Interesting that I am now the provocative one.
Which in particular? I forget which but one of the early C20th kings was apparently quite partial to using the word in its offensive capacity, calling an ethnic servant or boy to him with the word in a manner displaying a complete lack of irony.
Royal dregs?
And since when have royalty been known for having finer feelings for any of the lower strata of the populace?
So, you have no problem with the people to whom your word refers being offended?
And still you assume, with no evidence whatsoever, but, if you wish to believe the worst of someone who doesn’t immediately kowtow and genuflect in front of your eminence, who am I to protest against it?
So… You are offended by the ‘f’ word (another word which has origins in the middleages, if not further back), which at least illustrates a term to procreate, and want less use made (which I am all for) yet want the ‘n’ word, a word currently used (in Britain at least) for no other reason but to offend, reclaimed because it does not offend you?
In the first part:- Offended by its overuse, in fact, which shows a particular lack of imagination on the part of modern writers, but have no issue with its use (in the right context and male company, only) in times of high stress (used it myself, but usually under my breath, or when alone.)
In the second part, you’re assuming (yet again.) I have no wish for a word to be “reclaimed,” if it offends, but I’m perfectly free (however it might hurt your sensibilities) to regret its demise in normal everyday life.
It was an observation, and I did ask if it was true..?
And I chose to ignore yet another stir of the wooden spoon, because I can.
If you like. Not sure where it is written, so you’ll have to take it on the fly…
Doesn’t have to be written, since you take it for granted.
You being a rank 5, you mean, and me a lowly 3…
I mean no such thing, because I haven’t a clue what you’re talking about.
You do not know me, you will not know me and for that I shall be forever thankful.
It’s mutual
Just what exactly are you doing a wonderful job of assuming I was ‘suffering’ from?
I don’t, because I’m not interested; my concerns lie with Jim’s position.
It does seem strange that you are stirring up trouble on this thread by – being a troll – repeatedly dragging Linc’s thread in
Once = “repeatedly?
and calling me selfish in an attempt to get a reaction. If you think that doing so is in any way helping him then you are surely deluded.
Couldn’t care less if you react, and you’ve already admitted you don’t want to help.
Misuse by…who? It is an offensive word: There is now no way on earth that you can incorporate it into a conversation with people you are not familiar with without them drawing conclusions about you for using it. Under those circumstances the only person who be misusing the word would be you. Can you come up with a legitimate use for that word, one that doesn’t cause offense or rouse a moderators ire?
It used to be possible to buy a dye called N—– Brown, and I used that in a conversation with a (black) friend, while we were discussing the dog silliness.
I’m stirring and you aren’t answering a simple question. Guess you might be hiding your feelings by being patronising and not answering…
More assumptions, to which you’re quite welcome, but which only serve to show your ignorance of what I’m really like.
‘Them‘? Good grief. Did you use your special voice for the hard of understanding as well?[/sarcasm]
Is the lowest form of wit.
Maybe you are tired but I have already stated that I was using that to illustrate the changing of language… Do keep up
See response immediately above, and I have no wish to “keep up” with your brand of insolence.
Dregs of society was the term you used, I believe. They come from both high and low social orders – another attempt at illustration of a point that appears to have gone right over your head, I’m afraid.
Sarcasm really does become you.
I do not need you to kowtow, genuflect, whatever. If you want evidence then walk down Brixton high street
I have no need, since the same situation pertains in my home town, so I deleted the rest of your rant, since it doesn’t apply, and I have enough commonsense not to antagonise people just for the sake of it (you should try it sometime.)
Hurrah for you…!
Hurrah for never-ending sarcasm.
But I mentioned it because the offence that the ‘n’ word causes can be just as offensive as the ‘f’ word in the wrong location.
Something of which I’m perfectly aware, so would never use either in public, unless with long-standing friends (which you’ll never be, so don’t keep playing the wind-up game.)
So, again, when would you use that word, with all its offensive and racist baggage, in normal everyday life
So, again, I’ve already told you (and you tell me to try to keep up.)
(Helpful mode) Under your name, on each post, you are (at the moment) a Rank 5 Registered User.?
Still don’t know what it means
Three times now.
Seems you can’t get the message first time.
Words fail me.
That’s a first (but very welcome.)
Still not answering…again.
To those who know me, I don’t need to; you (as you’ve said) don’t want to know me, so a reply is pointless.
Think you might find that imitation is the lowest form of wit…
Actually, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, which is why I make every effort not to imitate your sarcastic style.
Somebody got out of bed the wrong side this morning…
Can’t, it’s against the wall.
Thank you.
You are exceedingly welcome.
Not me – it was suggested by a friend of colour (his intention was more to show how someone intent on causing offence would be pulled up, after the riots the other year).
Doesn’t apply, since I have no intention of deliberately causing offence; I leave that to others.
(Cue applause)
And the inevitable wearisome sarcasm
Can we go back to UKIP, now you have made your feelings blatantly obvious
I really began to wonder if I would ever get through
Before you-know-who comes piling in, accusing me of all sorts, I simply have the ability (being working-class) to understand some of the deep-seated resentment that sometimes surfaces. It’s very easy for those with Oxbridge accents to “see the wider picture” (i.e. what’s in it for them,) but asking a man to kill various nationalities, then, within living memory, telling him that we’re now best buddies, so turn off your hate, can be asking a bit much; as late as 1991, my father was thanking me for never buying a Japanese car, but I never let on that it was simply because their spare parts were too expensive.
You can tell the people, as much as you like, that Europe is absolutely wonderful, but, if they see little sign of that getting into their pockets and improving their lives, you might as well try to shout above the noise of a hurricane, especially when they see their “betters” cheating, lying, and thieving simply because they can. “Don’t do as I do, do as I tell you” gets a very dusty response.
Noel Coward was very popular, with the following:-
“Don’t let’s be beastly to the Germans
When our victory is ultimately won,
It was just those nasty Nazis who persuaded them to fight
And their Beethoven and Bach are really far worse than their bite
Let’s be meek to them
And turn the other cheek to them
And try to bring out their latent sense of fun.
Let’s give them full air parity
And treat the rats with charity,
But don’t let’s be beastly to the Hun.”
Is UKIP the best we can do? Normally, no, it isn’t, but until the other parties start listening, rather than dictating, and give the ordinary folk something to which they can look forward, the party has a future.
Ok Eddie, you got your jibe in: I accuse you of not ‘playing fair’, as requested by a moderator.
By all means report me, and be sure to show them where I mentioned you by name; the name’s Edgar, by the way, not “Eddie.”
Make sure you remove your rose-tinted spectacles.
Don’t own any, in fact they should be yellow-tinted, since I have a jaundiced view of politicians
tell me if politics and politicians were much different 50 years ago.
In 1966, having lived all my life in a leaking, cold “house,” with bucket toilet 50 yards down the garden path, and having had to share a bedroom with my mother for 25 years, our local MP, within a month of my mother seeing him, got the council to offer us a semi-detached 3-bedroom house. I have grave doubts that would happen today, because, since then, I’ve watched the quality of MP steadily deteriorate, so much that, for years, I’ve been unable to choose a party that seems to care about me, and others like me, in the slightest.