dark light

Edgar Brooks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Interrogation Reports at Kew…Question #989781
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    To access files, you will need a Reader’s ticket, which will require two items to prove your identity, one normally being a passport, plus driving licence or similar.
    Getting the file can lead to a 40 minute wait, which can be usefully (though potentially expensively) spent in the bookshop, which usually has lots of discounted items. The cafe is not cheap.
    If you pick the right nest of 8 tables, there are some with vertical pillars, which can be used as camera supports, enabling you to photograph your particular papers, then take them home.

    in reply to: Burmese Spitfires (again) #990341
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    There’s also a chance that, after months of scorching sun, the ground is too hard to allow the water to pass through, but that doesn’t carry the correct amount of negativity, of course..

    in reply to: Late Mk Spits and Seafire interior colour? #990648
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    According to (I think) the Crowood book on the Seafire, black was added to the top half of the 17 cockpit, because of distracting reflections in sunlight coming through the bubble canopy.

    in reply to: Burmese Spitfires (again) #991220
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    It’s really sad to see how many “experts” are desperate for this to end in complete failure, and (probably) financial ruin for one man. It’s easy to mock, sneer, and jibe, but at least Cundall got up from his computer screen, and went to look.
    If there’s nothing there, after all, I’ll refuse to join in the whoops and hollers of “I told you so,” which are bound to erupt, but, if something is found, I’ll be interested to see how many will crawl out, tails between legs, and apologise.

    in reply to: Late Mk Spits and Seafire interior colour? #991227
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    22 & 24 green, from available evidence (an always useful caveat,) with the 21 being some green, some black; there’s a clue in an October 1944 mod, which was “To standardise the Mk.21 fuselage to meet Naval requirements,” which could have included a black cockpit somewhere during the production run. Pilot’s Notes, for the 45, 46 & 47 show a black interior.

    in reply to: Mk 22 Spitfire Colours #991881
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    When AR213 had its first-ever complete rebuild, I was given access to some of the fuselage panels, which had been removed, and replaced. Cleaning off years of dirty “weathering” revealed a green which exactly matched a Humbrol colour chip, no.90 “Beige green,” not the always-quoted 78.
    Further investigation showed that, when fleetingly owned by Palitoy, Airfix’s 1/24 Spitfire I was issued, with instructions to paint the cockpit interior in 90. Unfortunately (like most of the modelling fraternity, since Airfix never actually bothered to indicate what 90 was for,) when Hornby took over the company, they thought that 90 was supposed to be Sky, and altered the formula to match it.
    When PSL published their book, on the Airfix kit, the authors included a recommendation to use 1 Eau-de-Nil plus a “slight touch” (how much is that?) of 38 Lime, which came nowhere near 78.
    It would be wonderful, now that the IWM’s airframes are down from their “eyrie,” and stored at Duxford, if someone could gain access to the Spitfire, and check it out, since the story is that it was this airframe that Messrs Cross and Scarborough used, as it had just been brought down for cleaning, at just the right time.
    As an extra point to ponder, in a pair of books, on cockpit interiors, by Hiroshi Seo, published in 1980, there’s a photo of the Science Museum’s S6B cockpit, and it, too, is remarkably close to Humbrol’s original 90.

    in reply to: Mk 22 Spitfire Colours #992063
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Interesting subject – Edgar, have you seen much evidence of the use of Grey Green for gear wells on the Mk.22? Its not a variant I have looked in to in much detail. I do have access to an unrestored Mk.IX airframe and that has some interesting colouration aspects to it which may be of interest.

    Very little, but fairly compelling; a 22, which arrived back at Duxford, around 10 years ago, had green wells and door interiors. There’s also a drawing, in the RAF Museum’s library, which calls for interior areas to be painted green; a previous drawing, dating from the start of the war, had advocated silver. It’ll need a visit to the museum, to see if I can decipher a date; my copy is too indistinct.
    The green continues to haunt the “seekers for truth,” since it might, initially at least, have been a completely different colour from the “Aircraft Grey Green,” in the B.S. range; in the National Archives, there’s a report, by a B.S. employee, on how they offered their services to the Air Ministry, but were turned down because they wanted to keep everything “in house.” Throughout the war, Farnborough seem to have been the unit which did all of the colour work, including mixing and issuing new colours.

    in reply to: Mk 22 Spitfire Colours #992939
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Green is correct; be sure to check for photos of your desired subject, since it was fairly common for the Griffon-powered 20-series aircraft to leave the cowlings unpainted and polished.

    in reply to: General Discussion #284400
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    It was a sardonic smile, but it was due to the news, in October, that yet another supplier is hiking their prices. Why? Well September is the month that the government uses to set the pension increase for next year, and surprise, surprise, inflation was down in September (again.) What a coincidence.

    in reply to: What Made You Smile Today III? #1880313
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    It was a sardonic smile, but it was due to the news, in October, that yet another supplier is hiking their prices. Why? Well September is the month that the government uses to set the pension increase for next year, and surprise, surprise, inflation was down in September (again.) What a coincidence.

    in reply to: Burmese Spitfires (again) #996936
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I like pies 🙂

    You leave Kate Humble alone.

    in reply to: General Discussion #284615
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    So we now have 20:20 hindsight on full beam, with everyone jumping on the blame game bandwagon, and no surprise that MPs are in the vanguard. One wonders what their reaction would be, if they were questioned on the Suez debacle, or the Falklands? “How the H— should I know?” is what I would expect, and it’s a pity that Entwhistle is obviously too much of a gentleman to respond in that way.
    I note that everyone is carefully avoiding the point that it’s MPs who recommend honours, so who proposed Savile’s knighthood, and why did he/she/they not know?
    “How could they not know” is what I hear, continuously; well, in 1965 I was accused of being a homosexual, at a time when I was running a local youth club, and my reaction convinced them that I was (and am) not. Years later, I discovered that one of my group of friends was a homosexual, and we were thought to be guilty by association. None of us had the faintest idea, because the person involved never made any sort of approach to any of us. It’s why I refuse to join in this hunting pack, and remind people of the “Innocent until proven guilty” rule that we have in this nation.

    in reply to: Jimmy Savile #1880410
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    So we now have 20:20 hindsight on full beam, with everyone jumping on the blame game bandwagon, and no surprise that MPs are in the vanguard. One wonders what their reaction would be, if they were questioned on the Suez debacle, or the Falklands? “How the H— should I know?” is what I would expect, and it’s a pity that Entwhistle is obviously too much of a gentleman to respond in that way.
    I note that everyone is carefully avoiding the point that it’s MPs who recommend honours, so who proposed Savile’s knighthood, and why did he/she/they not know?
    “How could they not know” is what I hear, continuously; well, in 1965 I was accused of being a homosexual, at a time when I was running a local youth club, and my reaction convinced them that I was (and am) not. Years later, I discovered that one of my group of friends was a homosexual, and we were thought to be guilty by association. None of us had the faintest idea, because the person involved never made any sort of approach to any of us. It’s why I refuse to join in this hunting pack, and remind people of the “Innocent until proven guilty” rule that we have in this nation.

    in reply to: General Discussion #285061
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u79/EdgarBrooks/scan0004-1.jpg

    in reply to: Jimmy Savile #1880646
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    http://i165.photobucket.com/albums/u79/EdgarBrooks/scan0004-1.jpg

Viewing 15 posts - 931 through 945 (of 1,308 total)