dark light

Edgar Brooks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #248721
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Accurate weather predictions (though it’ll probably take most of the 73 years before it happens.)

    in reply to: General Discussion #248566
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Funny, really, when you consider, only a few days ago, we were advised to get out more, since sunshine is the best way for us to absorb sufficient vitamin D.

    in reply to: General Discussion #247044
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Mares eat oats
    And Does eat oats
    And little lambs eat ivy.
    l

    A kid’ll eat ivy, too, wouldn’t you

    No, I wouldn’t.

    in reply to: General Discussion #247051
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Mairzy doats

    in reply to: General Discussion #246782
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Me

    in reply to: General Discussion #245973
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Especially if he’s a republican.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245992
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    First, take it into a darkened room, and wait for a few minutes; if you can see the interior tubes, or any other part, glowing, you are likely to have a problem with radioactive paint, and all that entails.
    However, the dial, tubes, and cross-wires look so bright, it’s possible that it’s been “modernised” post-war, and the radioactive paint and powder (inside the tubes) has been replaced by fluorescent material. If so, you can relax (a little.)
    The bowl should be filled with industrial alcohol (which is poisonous,) which stops the internal spider from rattling around uncontrollably. If the spider rocks around, and (worse) you can hear it rattling, the bowl needs to be refilled with liquid, since, if it completely dries out, the internal paint could flake off.
    If the paint doesn’t glow, of its own accord, get hold of a u/v lamp, and shine it on the compass (again in a darkened room); if the paint, etc., reacts to the light, and glows, you have far less to worry about.
    If you push the curved lever forward, you’ll find that the black bezel should be free to rotate, the idea being that you turn it until the heading you want is “on” the small tube level with the foot marked “fore.” (It’s under “30” in your photos.)
    Then rotate the compass until the “inverted T” inside the bowl is lined up with “N,” and you are now flying your Spitfire (or whatever) along your chosen heading.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245555
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    My (ex) Works Manager said he was determined to outlive me, so he could dance on my grave; my reply was “That’s good, because I’m being buried at sea.”

    in reply to: General Discussion #245453
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Ah, Edgar. You have children? Would you have been happy for them to have seen that picture when they were in junior school, or younger?…

    As usual, you twist and turn, trying to get away from the fact that you attach more importance to the existence of the photo than you have regard for the child’s wellbeing.

    There is little anyone can do about the boy in Syria

    So just sit back, and make no comment on it.

    Just a thought but several years ago I was given a job with the possibility of going into a morgue

    Well, good for you; about 25 years ago, I was asked to take photos of a stillborn child, in his coffin, or the mother, due to the hospital’s complete disinterest, would have had nothing by which to remember him, which I did, so keep your lectures to yourself.

    Do you think any preparation was done for that images appearance on the Sun’s front page, about whether everyone was ready to view it?

    I would expect that it had to pass inspection by the newspaper’s legal team.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245482
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Tony, Charlie & CD, I’d like to point out that it’s refreshing to see that you obviously care more about a blatant case of child abuse than the behaviour of something that has only a passing resemblance to a newspaper, and a retail outlet. At least you seem to have your priorities in the right order.

    in reply to: General Discussion #245329
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I’m sure all the “Trident Subs, Nukes, Typhoons, Tanks and lots of nasty savage soldiers with everything from Laser Designators to sharp sticks.” were a great comfort to Lee Rigby’s family.

    in reply to: General Discussion #244462
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    It would be more appropriate to move the Burma thread here to non-aviation surely?

    You just can’t give it a rest, can you?

    in reply to: General Discussion #243398
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I dare say there will be a deputation along shortly

    No, there won’t, but, in your usual overweening arrogant way, you haven’t noticed that the vast majority, on this site, no longer have the slightest interest in your everlasting tirades.

    you get the picture?

    Precisely; the only person on this forum, who incessantly comes out with these “offensive” words, is you, but, of course, you’re only being demonstrative, so it couldn’t possibly mean that it’s you who are the offensive one, could it?

    in reply to: General Discussion #243096
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Oh, come on – surely you know they believe that battered wives also deserve to be beaten, for burning the dinner or looking at them funnily…

    And who, precisely, are “they”? I hope you do not mean the members of this forum, since I speak as someone who, for a time, worked for a firm of private investigators, and, more than once, had to get between an angry husband and terrified wife. When you’ve seen a woman shaking with fear, simply for having to speak with a man (any man,) or had a five-year-old child throw her arms around you, pleading to “keep daddy away from me,” you (I hope, though I can’t be absolutely sure, since you appear to thrive on being objectionable) might find yourself reacting with anger at someone making the sort of crass, insensitive accusations you seem to love making.

    (Of course in the real world they’d run away from the incident with the ‘nasty’ man beating up the other ‘nasty’ man…)

    Easy to accuse someone (anyone) of cowardice, while carefully concealing your identity behind a pseudonym; other, less charitable, types might consider that an act of cowardice.

    in reply to: General Discussion #242938
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Tens of Thousands of children learn to fire and fire firearms in this country every year.
    So what is your point.

    That (maybe) they’d be better served if they were taught how to get on with others, rather than kill them?

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 1,308 total)