dark light

Edgar Brooks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: General Discussion #341480
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    An emmett is an ant, which rather tells you how some inhabitants of Cornwall see tourists (on whom they largely depend to keep the economy afloat.) Many years ago a friend went into a chemist’s shop, for some sunblock for her 2 year-old son. “Coconut oil,” said the girl,”It’s what the locals all use.” “Yes, and I’m not an emmett, so can we try again, please?” Red-faced, the girl got her the correct item (the boy would, literally, have fried, if she’d used the oil on his soft skin; locals, with skin like leather, are impervious.)
    Edgar

    in reply to: Words!! #1872512
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    An emmett is an ant, which rather tells you how some inhabitants of Cornwall see tourists (on whom they largely depend to keep the economy afloat.) Many years ago a friend went into a chemist’s shop, for some sunblock for her 2 year-old son. “Coconut oil,” said the girl,”It’s what the locals all use.” “Yes, and I’m not an emmett, so can we try again, please?” Red-faced, the girl got her the correct item (the boy would, literally, have fried, if she’d used the oil on his soft skin; locals, with skin like leather, are impervious.)
    Edgar

    in reply to: W/C Skalski Spitfire "SS" #1105908
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    “SS” was Skalski’s Spitfire IX RK853, according to “Combat Codes,” by Vic Flintham and Andrew Thomas.
    Edgar

    in reply to: TSR-1? #1154949
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The T.S.R.1 was a private-venture biplane, built by Fairey, and destroyed in an accident in September 1933; the Swordfish was an improved design, and was given the designation T.S.R.2.
    There might well be a file, with the definitive reason for the second TSR2 designation, lurking in the National Archives. The standard “closure time” for a file is 25 years, but, if it’s decided that there’s anything sensitive, that can expand up to 150 years.
    I was recently asked to check on a court martial, in 1946, but the file has a 75 year closure, so I couldn’t. If someone, in authority, decides that anyone involved has to be comfortably 6 feet under, before it comes to light, we may never see it.
    Edgar

    in reply to: A.M Compass Paint #1103499
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Pandect Instruments, of High Wycombe, can do them, as well.
    The recommended liquid is alcohol, or I.M.S. 99, which must be totally de-aerated for at least 1 hour. The seal, under the glass, is (now) 3mm rubber (used to be 1/8″, or, sometimes, a gooey 2-part mixture,) and the seal, for the filler point, is a fibre washer, which must be placed in some of the alcohol, during the de-aeration process, so that no air pockets remain in the fibre. During the filling process, also, the flexible diaphragm, in the base of the inner bowl, must be pulled out, about 1/4″, to allow for any expansion/contraction of the fluid, due to temperature changes. The paint is a special alcohol-proof type, which is not proof against many other liquids, especially cellulose, or white spirit (used in many smaller compasses.) SIRS build these compasses, from new, and stock all known spares, since they took over the line from Smiths, along with the E2B/C & 6B/6C landing compasses.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Serial Number Spitfire Wanted/Needed #1108044
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    In “Fighter Squadrons of the RAF and their aircraft,” John Rawlings said that the codes changed “In late 1994, or ealy 1945,” which is rather imprecise.
    Allan Lake, in “Flying Units of the RAF,” said that the change took place during October, 1944.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Slingsby Grasshopper #1108550
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    There used to be one at High Wycombe’s Royal Grammar School, during the 1950s; I had the doubtful pleasure, once, of helping to haul on the elastic rope. It was kept in the C.C.F. rifle range, which always seemed to be pushing their luck a bit.
    Edgar

    in reply to: RAF Tea #1111012
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Can’t help with the tea, but a former 609 Squadron rigger told me how their custard was regularly laced with cascara (hope I’ve spelt it correctly) “to keep us regular.” However, he said that they never stirred it in, so, if they saw an oily film, on top, they would swap their bucket for that of the Sergeant’s Mess. Apparently, the sergeants never understood why they spent so much time in the toilets.
    Edgar

    in reply to: DH Mosquito construction method? #1124036
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    If you can get to High Wycombe, I can introduce you to a man who built Mosquitoes during the war; High Wycombe was the main centre, for construction, due to its proliferation of (largely under-used) chair factories. There’s a very good book, published by the local council for £10 (at the last count,) on High Wycombe’s aircraft heritage, which is well worth the investment. The Mosquito Museum has the remains of one of the Hornet concrete moulds, in their care.
    Edgar

    in reply to: 401 Squadron – January 1943 #1088944
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Not until my next visit to the National Archives, in Kew. I’m doing research, of my own, there, and use the first 45 minutes, while my files are being unearthed, to help others with similar requests to yours. As it’s a round trip of 70 miles, and involves some particularly unfriendly motorways, I keep to Saturdays, and not every one, at that. I’m sorry, but you’ll just have to be patient.
    Edgar

    in reply to: RAF tail flash #1090215
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I don’t know if the rudder striping was an order, or just a proposal, but on April 3rd., 1940, the D.O.R. demurred, telling the Air Ministry that it would adversely affect the pre-balanced rudders, and proposing, instead, that the fin be used (presumably he didn’t know that 1 Squadron had gone ahead and proved him wrong – or rebalanced their rudders, which wasn’t easy.)
    Although I haven’t found the order, it appears that the Ministry did order the fins to be used, on May 1st., since, on May 11th., they clarified it, saying that the stripes did not need to cover the whole fin, they just had to be big enough to be visible.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Need the toilet! #1090943
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    If it was anything like the Elsan, that I had the dubious pleasure of dealing with, in my late teens and early twenties, it would have been filled 50-75% with a dark, pungent fluid, which would have stunk the fuselage out, in the unlikely event of the lid having been left up (that would also have invited spillage during taxying and take off.) Anyone in the U.K., who can remember Jeyes Fluid, will have a pretty good idea.
    One ex-Blenheim pilot told me of the fun and games they had with the “P” tube, since it always froze during flights, and, fairly understandably, the ground crew baulked at handling it. He said that it was quite a common occurrence, to see pilots bashing a “snake” over the wing’s leading edge, to persuade the contents to come out.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk 9 #1091706
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The wheels, on the Vc, were 2″ further forward than earlier Marks; this was a change that had first appeared on the Mk.III, possibly because of the extra length of the fuselage, caused by the Merlin XX. This caused the wheel to foul the upper surface, so the leg was allowed to hang lower, in its well, and the leg/wheel cover was curved to allow for it. The 2″ extra rake was carried on to Marks following the Vc, including the IX.
    Edgar

    in reply to: A Battle of Britain film question #1091715
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    According to “The Chianti Raiders,” the attacks didn’t start until October 24th., which puts them well after Hitler’s decision, to postpone the invasion, had been taken, so it would be difficult to make a film, that builds to a September 15th crescendo, then tack on another story, a month later.
    Edgar

    in reply to: 401 Squadron – January 1943 #1091923
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The ORB doesn’t give Christian names, and the service numbers only seem to have been noted (in some Squadrons) when aircrew were killed, so I could only find a (very) partial answer to your query.
    S/L Hodson flew BS172, but his main aircraft was BS383 (5 times.)
    Chapin flew BS196, BR263, W3839, BS383 (twice,) EN858 (3 times,) BS183 (9 times.)
    Godefroy flew BS534, BS183, EN129, BR630, AD231 (twice,) EN130 (7 times.)
    Sorry, like most Squadrons, 401 registered the serials, but not the code letters.
    Edgar

Viewing 15 posts - 1,216 through 1,230 (of 1,308 total)