dark light

Edgar Brooks

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,308 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spraying Camouflage In WWII #1186592
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    This hoary one comes up regularly, in the modelling world, with modern “experts” queueing up to say it never happened. We’ve made it a “sticky” subject on the Britmodeller website, and, so far, we’ve found people who used them, or saw them being used, in fact a friend saw the method still in use on Hunters, post-war. Remember that, during the war, with dispersed manufacturing, it was common for major parts to be made, then transported to the assembly site. Having to repaint items, because the pattern didn’t match, would have been a total nuisance. In the old series “Camouflage & Markings” are several works drawings, with positions of the edges of the pattern marked precisely to fractions of an inch, hardly likely if there was no need for conformity. One man, that I chat to regularly, used the mats in a factory, and also did freehand spraying in a repair unit. He described the mats as a coarse, but flexible, material (which sounds to me like rubberised horsehair,) and said that, when spraying freehand, the amount of overspray had to be 1″ maximum. We met some ex-Hawker employees, a few years ago, who described how they painted Hurricanes brown, then laid the mats on them, and sprayed the green. “When we had to do the “shadow” scheme, we just flipped the mats over, and used the other side.” said one. One question always being thrown at me, is “Why are there none left?” Well, rubber perishes, and, after 50+ years, there’d only be dust left, by now, and what factory management is going to hang on to paint-soaked lumps of rubberised hair, anyway? We have to presume that it’s easier, today, with the rare necessity for a warbird to be painted, to do this “wet-blending” method, than go for masks which will not be needed again for a long time, unlike wartime production, which was definitely not unhurried.
    Edgar

    in reply to: WW2 RAF Fighter Pilots Personal weapons #1203852
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    A lot shoved them down into their boots.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Aircraft demolition charge #1205909
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Some time ago, I read that the 1940-era German cannon rounds tended to explode on impact, rather than penetrating, then exploding. According to the Spitfire V manual, the IFF set was known as the A.R.I.5000, but I’ve found no reference to that no., in the list of mods, although an “R.3002 w/t equipment” is listed as being introduced from 28-12-40, and I don’t know what that was. In Crecy’s reprint of the Spitfire II Pilot’s Notes, the firing buttons, for the IFF destructor charge, do not appear.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Aircraft demolition charge #1208730
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The difference, of course, was that the charge in the Spitfire, etc., wasn’t designed to destroy the airframe, solely the IFF transmitter.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Hurricane wing incidence #1209954
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    According to the Hurricane II manual, incidence is 2 degrees for wing root and wings; can’t find any reference to an amount of washout, just an enigmatic statement that the “Chord at tip ignoring washout” was 3′ 11.25″.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Photo of Kygas fuel primer? #1211436
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Pilot’s Notes, for the XII, 22/24, and Seafire XV/XVII, all have photos of that particular style of pump. The Seafire 45/46 & 47 have the later type with the circular handle.
    Edgar

    in reply to: RAF Hunter details please. #1160500
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    The cannon, and ammunition boxes, were on a drop-out pallet, so the Adens had short barrels, and were totally hidden from view. One other thing to watch, and it’s true of all Hunter models; don’t drop the airbrake, if you have the u/c extended. The two items were linked; with u/c down, the brake could not be deployed (unless you had a fairly major hydraulics problem.)
    Edgar

    in reply to: Not a Spitfire #1163048
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Hurricane; when retracted, Typhoon and Tempest wheels never ended up that close together. I’d guess that it’s a Canadian repair facility, hence the chromate yellow primer, coupled with the photo having been taken by an American magazine photographer.
    Edgar

    in reply to: What was wrong with the Swift? #1163060
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I recommend that you get hold of a copy of “Swift Justice,” by Nigel Walpole; I bought mine at a much reduced price last year. The F.R.5 was flown, by two Squadrons, for 5 years, so it was hardly a failure; down low it had few equals, but it took too long to fix its initial problems.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Spifire Instrument colours #1165342
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    I repaired instruments, from 1985, and some of them were pretty old. I seem to remember that blue, and yellow, bezels were painted over original black, while red were already moulded in a fairly dark colour (maybe a material similar to Spitfire seats?)
    Edgar

    in reply to: Spitfire crowbar & secondary markings #1167456
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Fittings, for crowbars, were installed, on the I & II, from February, 1941, and the crowbars, themselves, were factory-fitted from January, 1942 (mods 320 & 483 apply.) I read (somewhere!) that the positioning of the stencils depended on the factory, and the Pilot’s notes seem to bear this out, with Spitfires generally having two stencils readable up or down, with Seafires having a single stencil readable from the side. At a model show, many years ago, a man (obviously an ex-pilot) commented to me “All these lovely Spitfire models, but, you know, all the time that I was flying I never saw a red crowbar; green, black, or silver, never red.”
    Edgar

    in reply to: Martin Baker MB3 and MB5 #1191894
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    “Air International” February, 1979 had an article on the M.B.5; “Aircraft Illustrated” November, 1985, had one on all five aircraft, but there’s not much.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Spitfires of Singapore AF #1192523
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    There’s a photo of PK683, in “Spitfire International,” during its time as a gate guard, but it appears to have been painted in a “representative” Battle of Britain QV-A scheme.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Boscombe down aircraft #1192527
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    According to all of my information, the T.12 was just a converted F.G.A.9, hence the bigger exhaust.
    Edgar

    in reply to: Spitfire auction #1199541
    Edgar Brooks
    Participant

    Apparently the new owner has to learn how to fly it, first.
    Edgar

Viewing 15 posts - 1,291 through 1,305 (of 1,308 total)