dark light

mongu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,161 through 2,175 (of 2,815 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eugenetics : the thread #1989091
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Eugenics : the thread

    The qualified personnel issue arises from lack of a formal recruitment framework. If you’re going to sort out the corruption and inefficiency, you need quality people. “Bright eyed boy” with his electrical engineering degree is decidedly not what I mean. I am in the middle of my accounting training contract, but my company absolutely insists on all applicants having a degree before they are accepted as trainees. All the work we do is completely reviewed by people who are already qualified. We also have to pass our exams first time or else we get the sack. The reason for this is that if we fail, there will be doubts cast over our work (even though all of it is reviewed). I tell you, a degee is nice but it is bugger all preparation for a real world job. To train as any of the professions I listed, a degee is only the starting point before 3-4 years under articles. My point is that the NHS seem to demand less ability and less professionalism than your local firm of accountants.

    Money is only half the problem. A newly qualified accountant with no particular specialty gets £35k at the absolute minimum. Add a specific expertise and the numbers shoot right up. Would the NHS pay this? Not on your life.

    You get what you pay for, I’m afraid.

    But paying for it shouln’t be difficult. I refuse to believe a green accountant can’t be given a living wage if you can pay a consultant £100k or whatever. Maybe that is half the answer – get rid of consultants? I’m sure some expertise will go with them, but when the newly hired accountants sort out the expenses they could afford to hire consultants again.

    in reply to: Liverpool #744417
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Liverpool

    If it was a charter flight Saab, wouldn’t it have a three letter code rather than three?

    in reply to: Charter Members? #744423
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Charter Members?

    I should think a charter member is one who joined at the start of the forum – ie. an original member.

    in reply to: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines #744512
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 29-07-02 AT 11:01 AM (GMT)]Oh, one last tribute…

    Manx had some great registrations:

    G-OMAN
    G-OJET
    G-ISLE
    G-LEGS
    G-HOPP
    G-MIMA

    G-MANC
    G-MANU

    Last two were for the sake of impartiality, obviously!

    in reply to: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines #744513
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines

    1. The IOM-specific inflight magazine is gradually being substituted for some bland tosh about tofu, yoga and high Montreal fashion (ie. BA’s Highlife).

    2. Comfort levels have been decreased.

    3. On the good side, Manx’s ridiculous frequent flyer scheme has been abolished. You had to present five ticket stubs to join, but they had to be “full fare”. Full fare meant £300 for a 30 minute stretch to MAN or £320 to LHR. “Cheap” meant £120 instead. I can now collect BA Miles instead, which is a definite improvement.

    4. Also an imrpoement is that fares are coming down. I have paid £75 rtn to LGW on my last few trips, a definite improvement on £320 even if the seats are now painful.

    5. We were getting BA mainline A319’s for a week or so recently when the 146 was in the shop. Much better flights. I wonder if we will replace the ancient 146 with any of BA’s shiny new A318’s when they aere finally delivered?. When there was a maintainance period, the old Manx used to fob us off on EAC 737-200’s.

    Anyway..last installment.
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d451f6bc5a86d60.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d451f89c5e166e1.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #424773
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Australia’s refugee problem

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 29-07-02 AT 10:34 AM (GMT)]Fair point Wombat. But like I said a little earlier, why is Australia so openly hostile to anyone – from anywhere – entering their country?????

    When I entered at Melbourne a few weeks ago, there were lots of nationalities on the plane – Brits, French, lots of Norwegians for some reason, a few Americans and I was sat next to a Canadian. Why were we all treated like Afghans or Pakistanis? Is it just a xenophobic thing – (hard to believe as Aussies are by and large nice friendly sorts). I understand the thing about not bringing diseases into Oz, but the interrogation was more along the lines of “what is the address of your employer?” and “please show me your return ticket”.

    Also – AUD 10,000 only buys GBP 3,500 rather than GBP 33,000 as you said. Still a heck of a lot to be spending on economic migrants though.

    The point of my rant is that Aussie imigration is perceived as being unfair, which is why a lot of press reports paint the refugee problem in a bad light.

    in reply to: Australia's refugee problem #1989157
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Australia’s refugee problem

    [updated:LAST EDITED ON 29-07-02 AT 10:34 AM (GMT)]Fair point Wombat. But like I said a little earlier, why is Australia so openly hostile to anyone – from anywhere – entering their country?????

    When I entered at Melbourne a few weeks ago, there were lots of nationalities on the plane – Brits, French, lots of Norwegians for some reason, a few Americans and I was sat next to a Canadian. Why were we all treated like Afghans or Pakistanis? Is it just a xenophobic thing – (hard to believe as Aussies are by and large nice friendly sorts). I understand the thing about not bringing diseases into Oz, but the interrogation was more along the lines of “what is the address of your employer?” and “please show me your return ticket”.

    Also – AUD 10,000 only buys GBP 3,500 rather than GBP 33,000 as you said. Still a heck of a lot to be spending on economic migrants though.

    The point of my rant is that Aussie imigration is perceived as being unfair, which is why a lot of press reports paint the refugee problem in a bad light.

    in reply to: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines #744517
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines

    “Now that is my favourite all time airliner. Forget the DC-10 and the 767-300, the BAE 146 is without a doubt the finest aircraft in the skies. I’ve just got to actually fly on one and back up my opinion!”

    The problem with the 146 is that there are two seating confugurations used by airlines; 3-2 or 3-3 abreast. Manx Airlines always used 3-2 and it was fairly comfy. However when BA bought them, they suddenly reverted to 3-3. This configuration is horrible!

    Anyway, more pics!
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d450da9a6e41e5b.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d450de3a7250adc.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d450e05a73fa813.jpg

    in reply to: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines #744588
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Pic of the moment – Manx Airlines

    Thanks guys. I never went on the 1-11, Bandeirante or F27, I’ve been lucky enough to fly on the rest though.
    Attachments:
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d4476543c699b4a.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d4476793c7fa1c9.jpg
    http://www.keypublishing.com/forum/importedfiles/3d4476d03cb2b7e9.jpg

    in reply to: General Discussion #424810
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Anti terror war-Isrealis style.

    How can the Sinai withdrawals have set a precedent if the major areas of occupied land are still held by Israel? You mention the West Bank yourself.

    in reply to: Anti terror war-Isrealis style. #1989179
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Anti terror war-Isrealis style.

    How can the Sinai withdrawals have set a precedent if the major areas of occupied land are still held by Israel? You mention the West Bank yourself.

    in reply to: General Discussion #424818
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Eugenics : the thread

    Moaning about too many managers is a common thing. But look at it the other way. One of the reasons the NHS is perpetually short of cash is that it is extraordinarily inefficient. Appointing people who will increase efficiency and reduce needless costs is the way to change this, surely?

    A good example is when communities save up to buy a scanner or some such. Fine, except that they only buy the scanner. Paying for the asset is only part of the cost of capital expenditure. Paying for on-going maintainence is equally vital. But we all hear stories of plastic washers costing £10 and other parts being preposterously expensive. This is because the NHS is being taken for a ride. Given the estent of the problem, it must only be down to corruption within the NHS. Getting new people in to do these jobs is a good way to tackle it. Nurses would scream bloody murder if the government launched a corruption which hunt!!

    The problem of being able to afford gardens but not wheelchair facilities is really down to bad budgeting. Same with my notional sick Dad. Most accountants within the NHS are not qualified. Don’t you find that shocking? No wonder budgets are poor. The budgeting process within the NHS is dreadful – I know, I studied it. Anyone advocating this at a similar size organisation (eg. Coca Cola or Ford) would be instantly sacked!

    Hence my argument – start recruiting quality personnel. All managers should be appropriately qualified:

    Qualified Accountants (ACA, ACCA, CIMA)
    Lawyers,
    Actuaries,
    Senior Clinicians

    Otherwise the financial framework will prevent the NHS doing its job.

    in reply to: Eugenetics : the thread #1989182
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Eugenics : the thread

    Moaning about too many managers is a common thing. But look at it the other way. One of the reasons the NHS is perpetually short of cash is that it is extraordinarily inefficient. Appointing people who will increase efficiency and reduce needless costs is the way to change this, surely?

    A good example is when communities save up to buy a scanner or some such. Fine, except that they only buy the scanner. Paying for the asset is only part of the cost of capital expenditure. Paying for on-going maintainence is equally vital. But we all hear stories of plastic washers costing £10 and other parts being preposterously expensive. This is because the NHS is being taken for a ride. Given the estent of the problem, it must only be down to corruption within the NHS. Getting new people in to do these jobs is a good way to tackle it. Nurses would scream bloody murder if the government launched a corruption which hunt!!

    The problem of being able to afford gardens but not wheelchair facilities is really down to bad budgeting. Same with my notional sick Dad. Most accountants within the NHS are not qualified. Don’t you find that shocking? No wonder budgets are poor. The budgeting process within the NHS is dreadful – I know, I studied it. Anyone advocating this at a similar size organisation (eg. Coca Cola or Ford) would be instantly sacked!

    Hence my argument – start recruiting quality personnel. All managers should be appropriately qualified:

    Qualified Accountants (ACA, ACCA, CIMA)
    Lawyers,
    Actuaries,
    Senior Clinicians

    Otherwise the financial framework will prevent the NHS doing its job.

    in reply to: General Discussion #424822
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Anti terror war-Isrealis style.

    I never said that I hate Ariel Sharon. I don’t doubt that he is a man one can “do business” with. However by all accounts, so is Arafat. Maybe Sharon can “do business”, but he doesn’t seem to want to. You talk about him giving back some settlements which Israel had occupied. Big deal – it was no more than a token. Do you disagree?

    Nor did I infer that Yasser Arafat is a paragon of virtue. To some extent, our support for the PLO is our attempt to deal with the US by proxy, given the near blind loyalty the US has to Israel. I’m sure you’ll say the US isn’t really that loyal to Israel, but it’s something the majority of non-Israelis/non-Americans believe I’m afraid.

    Nor did I suggest the EU are the real good guys. We have some spectacular faults. But given that anyone else does too, I don’t think it is a big deal.

    in reply to: Anti terror war-Isrealis style. #1989185
    mongu
    Participant

    RE: Anti terror war-Isrealis style.

    I never said that I hate Ariel Sharon. I don’t doubt that he is a man one can “do business” with. However by all accounts, so is Arafat. Maybe Sharon can “do business”, but he doesn’t seem to want to. You talk about him giving back some settlements which Israel had occupied. Big deal – it was no more than a token. Do you disagree?

    Nor did I infer that Yasser Arafat is a paragon of virtue. To some extent, our support for the PLO is our attempt to deal with the US by proxy, given the near blind loyalty the US has to Israel. I’m sure you’ll say the US isn’t really that loyal to Israel, but it’s something the majority of non-Israelis/non-Americans believe I’m afraid.

    Nor did I suggest the EU are the real good guys. We have some spectacular faults. But given that anyone else does too, I don’t think it is a big deal.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,161 through 2,175 (of 2,815 total)