Interflug nobody mention Ryanair.if Alitalia wants to survive catering must go for a while at least and becoming more punctual wouldnt hurt.When i look at a arrivals board Az and ib stand out as having bad punctuality and LH and Sk have excellent punctuality.Why are AZ always late.I saw their DUB-MXp flight departing today at 4 on the way home.It should have left a while before that.
I have an Italian freined and he says thats why he avoids Alitalia.
I don’t think that catering is the point. My wife is Italian-Australian and her parents, grandparents etc are all Italian immigrants. Their POV is that Alitalia got really low loads on Oz flights because of their really poor levels of service. And remember that Australia is home to perhaps the 3rd highest number of Italians in the world, after Italy itself and the USA!
After a horrible FCO-MIL experience 2 years ago I see their point: cabin crew were VERY rude to the extent of me wishing for AZ to go bankrupt!
Mein flugfuhrer!
Mein flugfuhrer!
LGW-JER has 5 daily frequencies: all with the 737-500. I believe, as MarkL said, that this will change to A319 at some point. JER in particular is an important destination and the jewel in the offshore crown.
Despite runway length (and an improvement in this regard would really help Jersey) I don’t have any fears for the future viability of JER.
GCI does suffer from a short runway, but to be honest it shouldn’t bother them. Proximity to JER means most airlines won’t bother flying to both GCI and JER. Given that JER has a bigger airport, bigger population and more cachet, GCI is restricted to inter-island flights and regional flights to major UK centres as well as the odd French connection.
IOM: It’s not as major a desitnation as JER but has grown at a much faster rate over the last 5-10 years. IOM has the potential to overtake Jersey, in part due to the overcrowding of the Channel Islands and the restrictive visa regulations there – not to mention property restrictions. Right now, All 3: JER, GCI and IOM are in a downward trend economically. IOM still has notional full employment, but the reality is a bit starker. My house price and my wage here in the IOM looks good compared to the national average, but I certainly don’t feel very wealthy! The same applies to a lot (the majority) of people in the Channel Islands. The “West”, or more specifically the OECD, IMF and the US of bloody A, despise the British offshore centres and are trying to bankrupt us. It aint so easy though: per head of population, we’re crowed with clever accountants (moi!), bankers and lawyers and have a very innovative legal framework.
Summary:
JER looks safe but won’t go anywhere much without runway expansion.
GCI is a bit dodgier but still quite viable..
IOM is most at risk, but has the most potential. The runway IS being extended into the sea (just about anyway).
On a sidenote, the expansion at IOM has been a good thing to witness over the last few years. FlyBe and Eastern have arrived in force and new airlines like Emerald and EuroManx are starting to make a mark. BA has shrivelled, but the LGW and MAN flights ought to be viable, even with room to upgrade frequencies/eqipment. The BA flight to LTN is a mystery!
LGW-JER has 5 daily frequencies: all with the 737-500. I believe, as MarkL said, that this will change to A319 at some point. JER in particular is an important destination and the jewel in the offshore crown.
Despite runway length (and an improvement in this regard would really help Jersey) I don’t have any fears for the future viability of JER.
GCI does suffer from a short runway, but to be honest it shouldn’t bother them. Proximity to JER means most airlines won’t bother flying to both GCI and JER. Given that JER has a bigger airport, bigger population and more cachet, GCI is restricted to inter-island flights and regional flights to major UK centres as well as the odd French connection.
IOM: It’s not as major a desitnation as JER but has grown at a much faster rate over the last 5-10 years. IOM has the potential to overtake Jersey, in part due to the overcrowding of the Channel Islands and the restrictive visa regulations there – not to mention property restrictions. Right now, All 3: JER, GCI and IOM are in a downward trend economically. IOM still has notional full employment, but the reality is a bit starker. My house price and my wage here in the IOM looks good compared to the national average, but I certainly don’t feel very wealthy! The same applies to a lot (the majority) of people in the Channel Islands. The “West”, or more specifically the OECD, IMF and the US of bloody A, despise the British offshore centres and are trying to bankrupt us. It aint so easy though: per head of population, we’re crowed with clever accountants (moi!), bankers and lawyers and have a very innovative legal framework.
Summary:
JER looks safe but won’t go anywhere much without runway expansion.
GCI is a bit dodgier but still quite viable..
IOM is most at risk, but has the most potential. The runway IS being extended into the sea (just about anyway).
On a sidenote, the expansion at IOM has been a good thing to witness over the last few years. FlyBe and Eastern have arrived in force and new airlines like Emerald and EuroManx are starting to make a mark. BA has shrivelled, but the LGW and MAN flights ought to be viable, even with room to upgrade frequencies/eqipment. The BA flight to LTN is a mystery!
Premium Economy usually costs the same (or 1p less) than full business. And given that business class on short haul routes is cr*p I don’t see the point. They have the same seats as Economy. The only difference is lounge access and perhaps a proper plate for your sarnie. The extra cost of the ticket is not justifiable.
My employers usually buy us the cheapo tickets. If we need extra flexibility, and we can’t change on a cheap ticket, we just buy another ticket and claim it on expenses. Works out a fair bit cheaper!
I flew on that ATR 42 this evening. Or at least, the sister ship PH-RAK, on EuroManx flight 3W412 LPL-IOM.
Danairboy: they hand out OJ inflight, and hand out boiled sweets from a wicker basket before landing! No food, but in mitigation flight time was under 25 minutes this evening.
The A330 isn’t a replacement for the B767 at all – the business doesn’t work that way and some airlines use both types.
Any aircraft can replace any other type of aircraft. Qantas for instance is replacing the 767 with A330’s.
Our of interest, how much would it cost to buy one of those DC10s or 747s?
Would serve as a brilliant new office!
I think the A330’s are replacing the 767’s overall, so that would include all current 767 routes.
I’m not sure the 767’s are that bad to be honest. I flew SYD-MEL last year on a 763 and it was fine – no worse inside than any other airline’s 763 and better than more than a few.
The trouble is that Nigerian airlines have one of the most awful records of any country anywhere. I have flown on a small number of African owned/run airlines and they were fine (Air Kenya, Zambian) but Nigeria is a different category altogether.
I would rather a Nigerian carrier be truly that. Branson seems to be a megalomaniac of late. He wants to run an airline everywhere on earth. I would rather any money earned by a Nigerian carrier to stay in the country and not to go back to Branson and the UK.
Option A = fly on an airline using dodgy aircraft in a country with such a dodgy government that quite frankly you or I could gain an AOC if we paid enough.
Option B = fly on an airline using good aircraft that is run professionally.
Don’t be so PC!
I would personally kill anyone that changed or proposed to change the airport codes. The thought of having to change every airport code in the computer system of the transport company I work for is enough to give me the shivers. Really, you should not mess with something that is working really well.
For passengers it may not always be logical. Well, so what? How many airports display their flights just by IATA/ICAO code? How many tickets are printed with just the IATA/ICAO code? There are none, the city and/or airportname are always listed as well. It’s only us geeks that are interested in IATA/ICAO codes.
Us geeks may also like to know that to some extend the 3 letter codes are also used for seaports. At least within the company I work for so I am assuming this is used worldwide. If I want to ship a container to the port of Houston I enter HOU, Montreal is YUL etc.
So why do we have both 3 and 4 letter codes? And why do airlines have 2 or sometimes 3?
Concore seen thorugh the windows of T4 at Heathrow.
It will be unfair to any Nigerian competition as ‘Virgin Nigeria’ will be backed up by the wealthy British company and will not suffer from any financial problems that the true Nigerian airlines might.
So you think it is unfair for any Western airline to fly to/from/witihin the 3rd world then?