dark light

mongu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 2,815 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The US warns more countries #1956240
    mongu
    Participant

    The Wolfowitz plan all along was for a rolling campaign against the “axis” with Iran presumably next on the hit list.

    In such an eventuality, Arab sentiment would be utterly anti-US anyway, so who cares if they are a little upset before hand?

    I do agree that Syria and Russia have every right to sell to whom they will without US “permission” and inevitable anti-US sentiment will only rise more in Damascus (but who cares?) and Moscow (they bloody well should care!).

    mongu
    Participant

    How do the arrangements work for these things?

    I would have assumed that an airline will buy all their fuel in bulk from one (or two) companies like BP or Elf or whoever – so their credit would be good at any outlet of BP or Elf, the same way you can get a petrol company chargecard in the UK?

    Secondly, it might be an idea for Capts to be issued corportate credit cards for contingency use? That’s what normally happens in industry when employees might need to spend cash on employers’ behalf.

    Thirdly, do charter airlines have in-house insurance divisions? I have recently been spending my CPD hours looking into Captive Insurance schemes, which is when a company effectively insures itself by setting up an insurance subsidiary which buys insurance wholesale from the market. Apparently a lot of airlines have these.

    mongu
    Participant

    Yes, but the Captain would simply have claimed the money back on expenses. I think it was very unprofessional to ask passengers to deal with it.

    in reply to: Injured Soldiers flown into UK #759352
    mongu
    Participant

    18 personnel?!

    The RAF badly need to buy a fleet of biz jets or ACJ’s!

    in reply to: Which airline has the worst aircraft? #759356
    mongu
    Participant

    …or Lufthansa?

    Lots of airlines fly to dusty destinations with white or partially white aircraft. Look for pictures of Qantas aircraft at Alice Springs!

    What it surely boils down to is that AF is the worst offender amongst the “big” airlines. As for allowing Concorde to get so mucky…something is very wrong in their PR department.

    in reply to: Operating cost II #759359
    mongu
    Participant

    Not that I’m trying to muddy the waters, but what does “cost” mean? There are whole textbooks which look at different interpretations of the term!

    Do you mean direct costs only?

    Do you also want to include overheads?

    How about the opportunity costs?

    How about the set-up and arrangement costs?

    in reply to: General Discussion #371048
    mongu
    Participant

    Hang on a second everyone.

    It doesn’t actually matter what we (or maybe even the majority) think of Al’Qaeda or what should be done to them.

    What DOES matter is the legal envoironment:

    1. The Taliban detainees ARE PoW’s because they were officers and servants of a soveriegn country who were captured by US soldiers.

    2. Al’Qaeda detainees ARE NOT PoW’s because they were not acting in the name or on the behalf of a nation state. They are therefore subject to the usual criminal law.

    3. As there are two types of detainee the treatment of detainees will also be of two types – Taliban detainees should have been kept in their uniforms and subjected to the full rigamorole of the Geneva Convention as enemy Pows. Al’Qaeda detainees should have been subject to criuminal proceedings as per the US legal system.

    4. In both cases this has not happened – the GC was not complied with, nor were the criminal cases dealt with. In fact the US circuit Court has ruled that US Courts have no jurisdiction, becayse Guantanamo Bay is not US sovereign territory (even though it is!)

    5. The US government is therefore not only breaking rules all over the place, it is also breaking US law!

    6. I am not a lawyer and appreciated there are deep legal issues in each of my points but my view remains that my points are factual in nature and taken individually, they are beyond dispute.

    in reply to: Geneva Convention #1956525
    mongu
    Participant

    Hang on a second everyone.

    It doesn’t actually matter what we (or maybe even the majority) think of Al’Qaeda or what should be done to them.

    What DOES matter is the legal envoironment:

    1. The Taliban detainees ARE PoW’s because they were officers and servants of a soveriegn country who were captured by US soldiers.

    2. Al’Qaeda detainees ARE NOT PoW’s because they were not acting in the name or on the behalf of a nation state. They are therefore subject to the usual criminal law.

    3. As there are two types of detainee the treatment of detainees will also be of two types – Taliban detainees should have been kept in their uniforms and subjected to the full rigamorole of the Geneva Convention as enemy Pows. Al’Qaeda detainees should have been subject to criuminal proceedings as per the US legal system.

    4. In both cases this has not happened – the GC was not complied with, nor were the criminal cases dealt with. In fact the US circuit Court has ruled that US Courts have no jurisdiction, becayse Guantanamo Bay is not US sovereign territory (even though it is!)

    5. The US government is therefore not only breaking rules all over the place, it is also breaking US law!

    6. I am not a lawyer and appreciated there are deep legal issues in each of my points but my view remains that my points are factual in nature and taken individually, they are beyond dispute.

    mongu
    Participant

    Originally posted by EGNM
    lol – so other than the SD360, shall we have a poll on what his next favourate current commercially operated British Build a/c is? – i’ll go for the SD330 😉

    You’re serious????

    I guess the Shorts are the opposite of the ATP: technical people always defend them but as a passenger, they are truly awful!

    They are the butt of jokes – ask any non-aviation fan about them and you always get “urgh”!

    in reply to: airline flight simulators #759364
    mongu
    Participant

    I’m not a pilot, but I have spent some time in a full motion sumulator, a B757-200 one.

    The principal difference was initially the motion effect as well as the atmosphere, as it feels and looks like an actual flight deck.

    The graphics were amazing for their day (1992) and fairly realistic, although I dare say things have since improved. The main difference graphically, was the entire field of vision you got looking out of the flightdeck windows, as opposed to a screen on a PC which only gives you a sideways view when you press a button, and not when you turn your head. Also the graphics were very smooth – no dropped frames or big hourglass icons suddenly appearing!

    The only downer was the sound quality. The engines and so on sounded realistic, but I think the speakers were duff because none of the automated voices were clear. For example when I was “landing” the computer told me “don’t think” which made me confused. Apparently the speaker had a lisp, because it should have been “don’t sink”.

    Anyway, sorry for the rambling and non-expert reply, but to conclude I would say that current PC sims are useful, but they still don’t compare at the end of the day, due to the limitations of field of vision, graphics, sound, motion and atmosphere. I don’t know enough to comment on flight physics or anything like that.

    mongu
    Participant

    Why didn’t the Captain pay it himself?

    in reply to: Which airline has the worst aircraft? #653089
    mongu
    Participant

    Saab,

    Some fair points. But some airlines are consistently dirty and others are not. If the fleet flexibility and expense were the reasons for infrequent cleaning, wouldn’t Ryanair or Easyjet be really filthy?

    in reply to: operating cost #653268
    mongu
    Participant

    I don’t think they’d tell you!

    mongu
    Participant

    The ATP is perfectly OK as a passenger!

    I think the severe techincal failings of the aircraft have been pointed out a few times however.

    in reply to: 747-400 Lite #653446
    mongu
    Participant

    Quite correct GD, but I know you get my drift!

Viewing 15 posts - 1,231 through 1,245 (of 2,815 total)