dark light

mongu

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,321 through 1,335 (of 2,815 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Ryanair Massive Expansion !!! #661211
    mongu
    Participant

    I agree that Ryanair’s schedules are deceptive – they’ll probably call Ostend “Paris North” or something. I’m only half joking!

    However it is not Ryanair’s fault that all the jobs have been lost.

    The blame for that is with the people responsible for running Sabena etc. What arrogance to take the view that because they were an airline, commerciality did not apply to them!

    in reply to: New airline for SW UK? #661744
    mongu
    Participant

    I would guess there is a market for this airline, provided they can keep the LGW slots or maybe transfer to LHR (as if!) or LCY.

    I actually flew LGW-PLH return, just under 12 months ago on a Dash 8-Q300.

    The runway at PLH is tiny – well under 1,000m I should say and certainly shorter than LCY.

    in reply to: 146 landing on all 3? #662018
    mongu
    Participant

    146 taking off

    Lesson 1: How to make the passengers nervous!

    Qantas 146 taking off at Canberra.

    in reply to: Ryanair Massive Expansion !!! #662296
    mongu
    Participant

    But without that shareholder pressure, pension funds will suffer…it’s a cases of noses and faces!

    in reply to: Ryanair Massive Expansion !!! #662306
    mongu
    Participant

    Wys – your’e 2/3 correct. The MD also has pressure from a 3rd source, shareholders and investors. In the case of listed companies (like Ryanair) this pressure can be massive.

    Let me explain…

    Most companies have shareholders in 2 categories: Small investors (the americans call these “retail investors”) such as you and I. Then there are the large institutional shaeholders, like the pension funds. These large shareholders might account for more than 50 or 60% of the shareholders with just 2 or 3 people (the investment managers) controlling them.

    By law, pension funds are only allowed to invest in companies which pay out a steady dividend. This is so that they have enough income generated to meet at least some of their regular committments (ie. someone’s pension). Capital growth is used to meet the rest of their commitments.

    Hence…a majority of the shareholders put the MD and FD under intense pressure not only to keep the share price healthy, but also to pay out dividends. Sometimes the dividend is dispensed with, but that is a risky decision. I’ve had to read whole books and study page long formulae to understand the implications and the basis for “dividend or no dividend” decisions.

    What you say is basically right Wys, the Board need to be able to balance all 3 sides and try to preserve morale. But I have no illusions that that is very difficult and although to be MD or FD is my own personal objective, I am under no illusions that at the moment I am not sufficiently developed (as a person and also professionally) to attempt such a job. It’s not the “£1m a year and a chaeffeured Jag with no real stress” that Unions make it out to be, you know.

    in reply to: Swiss seals deal with Japan Airlines #662311
    mongu
    Participant

    That makes sense Saab.

    So the regulators regard any cooperation between airlines as illegal, unless both airlines are granted immunity to work together?

    In any case, I should have thought a tripartite legal agreement between BA, AA and Swiss should be able to be reached which will protect BA from having pax poached from LHR to ZRH.

    in reply to: Swiss seals deal with Japan Airlines #662452
    mongu
    Participant

    Saab, how do you mean that an AA-Swiss relationship would enjoy antitrust immunity?

    PS – “antitrust” is clearly an Americanism and I’m not sure what it actually means. Is it linked to “anticompetitive” ?

    in reply to: US to have access to airlines passenger data #662455
    mongu
    Participant

    The problem is, I do not understand how this will actually prevent another 9/11.

    It is as if various authorities are glad that 9/11 happened, because it gave them an excuse to extend their powers and authorities. I’m not specifically bad mouthing US Customs (I think) but…

    in reply to: Ryanair Massive Expansion !!! #662463
    mongu
    Participant

    No problem Interflug.

    Accountancy is a misunderstood profession – the “beancounter” or “cost cutter” mentality is only part of our job, but everyone seems to focus on it and cast us all in a bad light.

    I wonder what would have happened to Sabena or Swissair if an accountant had been in charge 10 years ago ?

    in reply to: Ryanair Massive Expansion !!! #662709
    mongu
    Participant

    I don’t agree that having an accountant in charge means disregarding morale and customer service.

    Those two concepts are fundamental to success, surely?

    You have to look at the training accountants receive. Part of their job when they are articled, is to conduct audits. To do that, they need to be able to grasp exactly how a company works and how ir operates. It is useful if they have the experience to compare that to other companies in the same industry – which they often do. One of my first jobs a while back (when I was a junior) was to attend a stock count at a warehouse. That was it – observe and make sure the management were doing it properly. My limited experience was sufficient that I was competent to do that, and if you then take a qualified and experienced accountant, that can be done to nearly any area of business – accountants develop expertise in designing and testing systems and procedures and in making efficiencies as a result.

    Part of my own job is checking and trying to find fault with my boss’s work. I love it!!

    Therefore, in terms of looking for someone who knows a helluva lot about running a business, the profession that companies often look at these days is…accountancy.

    I can’t back this up, but if you look at the CEO’s of most of the FTSE 250, accountants form a bigger proportion of them than lawyers or bankers et al.

    I think to be fair to O’Leary, a lot of the issues at Ryanair involve middle management and not MOL himself.

    in reply to: Virgin…2 concordes!?! #662900
    mongu
    Participant

    I’m not convinced on the freighter idea.

    And frankly there is not a great deal of money in it for Virgin. But the whole point of Concorde is not to make money (though it’s a nice bonus) but to top of the range.

    A bit like the airline equivalent of a 7-series BMW.

    in reply to: Swiss seals deal with Japan Airlines #662909
    mongu
    Participant

    A oneworld hub at ZRH would attract continental passengers away from Star airlines like Lufthansa and Austrian, so I think BA may be a bit panicky by objecting too much.

    in reply to: Ryanair Massive Expansion !!! #662912
    mongu
    Participant

    Well the name of the game is profit and I can’t blame O’Leary for being fairly succesful in following the rules of the game.

    I think people tend to be a little harsh on Ryanair in particular and Locos in general. Surely you remember the days when BA would charge £300 (often more) for 45 minutes in a turboprop or RJ? Then along come the locos and you pay £100 for 2 hours in a 737.

    And some “full service” airlines are not exactly good airlines. In general, I like BA. But I’ve had a fair few bad experiences with them all the same, and this is getting more and more frequent. It does tend to make you think “what exactly am I paying the extra for?”

    BA’s recent advert was silly – more staff, for one. Fine. There are queues at check in and BA’s “extra staff” stand around talking!

    The interesting bit has been when locos have started the short 737 hops on routes where other airlines lost money using props and RJ’s. LPL-BFS springs to mind.

    in reply to: Another Big one to bite the dust? #662921
    mongu
    Participant

    There’s no tears lost here. I have not been impressed with KLM based on personal experience and that of friends and family.

    Also, KLM could have bee saved a few years ago if it had agreed to the acquisition by BA. But they tried to punch above their weight and insisted on being an “equal partner” in a “merger” with a far bigger airline.

    At the present time I think it is highly unlikely that BA has the resources to try again. Northwest certainly do not either and I cannot think of any other “natural fit” airline which does.

    I think however, that KLM will essentially survive. Most of the more profitable long haul sectors will be retained and some others will be contracted out, as will lots of short haul services – pretty much in the Sabena mould.

    in reply to: Virgin…2 concordes!?! #663827
    mongu
    Participant

    You honestly think BA would honour a museum pledge?

Viewing 15 posts - 1,321 through 1,335 (of 2,815 total)