dark light

Doug97

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Harrier GR.9A #2548559
    Doug97
    Participant
    in reply to: Eurofighter DASS Configurations #2553046
    Doug97
    Participant

    Mowers, are you a fan of Falcon 4.0, by any chance?

    in reply to: METEOR for US legacy jets? #2553719
    Doug97
    Participant

    I don’t think it’s really necessary, what with all the upgrades planned for the Aim-120.

    in reply to: Harrier GR.9A #2554136
    Doug97
    Participant

    Would the GAU-12 fit in them? Doesn’t look like the right shape …

    Maybe 2 M781s?

    in reply to: newbie calling – Gun on Typhoon #1806737
    Doug97
    Participant

    What type of ammunition will it get? The fancy Rheinmetall fragmenting sabot rounds (which seem to me great for A2A but not so good for strafing)?

    http://www.rheinmetall-defence.com/index.php?fid=1527&lang=3&pdb=1

    in reply to: Harrier GR.9A #2554865
    Doug97
    Participant

    I know they’re not gun pods; what kind of sensors are in them?

    in reply to: Guns for RAF EF2000 #2555014
    Doug97
    Participant

    “He contrasted their performance with the support offered by US air force A10 aircraft, which are equipped with a 27mm rotary cannon.”

    LOL

    in reply to: Harrier GR.9A #2555111
    Doug97
    Participant

    Intriguing, how do the 2 Brimstone versions compare to the 2 Hellfire versions?

    Didn’t Harrier used to have twin belly-mounted 30mm cannon? What are the two things in that position in the picture I posted?

    in reply to: Harrier GR.9A #2555571
    Doug97
    Participant

    Well according to this page, there are definitely Gr9As flying!

    http://www.jetphotos.net/

    http://images1.jetphotos.net/images/img2/0/060721-ZG503jpn.jpg.60508.jpg

    in reply to: Harrier GR.9A #2555668
    Doug97
    Participant

    Sorry to dig up this old thread, but does anyone know if there are now any Gr9/9As flying? If so, how many, and what are their new capabilities compared to the Gr7/7A?

    in reply to: Sea Flash vs Sea Sparrow #1806831
    Doug97
    Participant

    The follow-on to the Skyflash is the Improved Skyflash, the principal design changes were a series of upgrades to the SARH seeker and a Kinematic Upgrade program, which saw aerodynamic changes to reduce airframe drag and changes to the control system.

    The seeker employed by the Active Skyflash is a Thompson-CSF design, a pulse Doppler high PRF (Pulse Repetition Frequency) active radar seeker with a slotted flat plate planar array antenna. The antenna is gimballed to provide a 55 degree off boresight limit, and is rate stabilised and directly driven by geared motors. In this respect it is similar to the AMRAAM seeker.

    Where the seeker differs fundamentally from AMRAAM is in the use of an injection locked solid state transmitter, this approach was initially sought by AMRAAM designers but had to be rejected due reliability problems in the then immature high power microwave transistors. The state of the art has progressed since, and the Skyflash seeker exploits the newer and more power efficient technology, which avoids the need for a high voltage power supply, with its associated penalty in weight, volume and power drain. The transmitter is fed from a high purity microwave source, the reference signal from which is amplified by the transmitter chain.

    More here: http://www.ausairpower.net/skyflash-slammer.html

    in reply to: How could the A-10 be upgraded/ kept in service? #2556112
    Doug97
    Participant

    The A-10 cannon seems pretty effective at CAS 1:00 minute into this clip:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pFOCvm00qI

    in reply to: Wasting the defence budget? #2556893
    Doug97
    Participant

    i can’t imagine the british poodles buying a more reliable more advanced and usefull Tiger..

    Poodles?
    http://www.tobefrank.co.uk/cybersmack/funnypics_files/surrender1eg.jpg

    in reply to: Wasting the defence budget? #2557122
    Doug97
    Participant

    …but surely new designs are needed to combat the changing face of warfare?

    Of course, and there are already plenty of them.

    I don’t feel the Apache is an inadequate attack helecopter just that it is not going to be 100% capable of fulfilling our future requirements, whereas an aircraft designed with tomorrows needs in mind might be a better choice.

    The one that springs to mind is Comanche. If it was too expensive for the US to finish, what chance do you think the UK would have of completing something similar?

    in reply to: Seawolf Video #2039727
    Doug97
    Participant

    Seawolf in action:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6pwSTZtI7M&mode=related&search=

    P.S. Not the submarine… 😉

    Wow that was FAST!

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 409 total)