dark light

Doug97

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: CVF News #2042467
    Doug97
    Participant

    I have no problem with a countries armed forces being run down in the way in which the UK’s have been and still are as long as the politicians giving the orders realise what they are doing. Unfortunately the case with the UK is that those in power over stretch the armed forces and put lives at risk just to staisfy their own egos. If you want a coastal defence force then so be it but just remember that is all it is.

    That’s exactly how I feel … one minute they’re slashing the defence budget yet again, the next they’re declaring war on someone new. It’s like they’re trying to see how far they can go without paying before they get caught (and by caught I mean embroiled in a disaster brought about by being spread too thin).

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578108
    Doug97
    Participant

    I agree, unless you make it very clear which facet of the aircraft’s capabilities you’re talking about. But how many of these JSF/F22 vs Typhoon/Rafale threads are we going to get? It’s damn boring now.

    Doug97
    Participant

    Hopefully, but I doubt it. There were similar problems with the Tornado and even as far back as the Jaguar. Not sure about helicopters, though … maybe the record for the Tiger etc. is better.

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578146
    Doug97
    Participant

    Yeah, the EF is 5th generation in every way except for stealth. Which, unfortunately, means it’s not 5th generation.

    Doug97
    Participant

    I just think it’s funny that the French left the consortium because they wanted carrier capability and no-one else did, and now the British are forced to go to the Americans for planes for their new carriers!

    It would have been much better if the other countries had listened to the French … we would now have France on the team to help share the costs and increase orders, less political bickering to slow down development, no competitor to the EF for export, and no need to buy the JSF.

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578186
    Doug97
    Participant

    What type of ESM and other Dect. does the EF have ??

    The EF EW suite is called DASS.

    DASS provides an all-round prioritised assessment of threats with fully automatic response to single or multiple threats. DASS includes an Electronic Countermeasures / Support Measures system (ECM/ESM), front and rear missile approach warners, supersonically capable towed decoy systems, laser warning receivers and SaabTech Electronics BOL chaff and flare dispensing system.

    The passive ESM provides hemispherical coverage, with effective threat identification in high-density environments. To facilitate the automatic initiation of active countermeasures, the ESM assesses potential threats and then provides appropriate information to the ECM and other aircraft systems. To achieve this, the ESM employs multiple antennas mounted on various positions on the aircraft, to enable detection of transmissions arising from any direction. Special facilities have been incorporated within the ESM receivers to enable effective handling of simultaneous signals, ensuring that the ESM works effectively in environments with extremely high pulse density.

    Doug97
    Participant

    I agree it’s a shame the EF-2000 has taken so long, I think a large part of it was to do with the political bickering between all the different countries involved. It should have been in service 10 years ago, and if it had been it would have been the best fighter in the world. But it’s already lost that title.

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578449
    Doug97
    Participant

    But can Eurofighter still accomplish its mission with those switches in the “off” position? F-35 can, as can F-117, F-22 and B-2.

    What mission are you talking about, exactly? I thought this thread was about F-35 vs. Typhoon.

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578461
    Doug97
    Participant

    F-35 enroute to a target has minimal RF emissions as part of its design:
    >IFF transponder – normally turned off, on for traffic management over friendly territory
    >missile approach warning system – 360 degree IR imaging through DAS
    >radar altimeter – typically turned off, also has an LPI mode, 3D nav via GPS is normal
    >voice comms – typically not used except near friendly airbase, also has an LPI mode
    >datalinks – compressed burst transmission using LPI mode (if ORCLE can be made to work, laser DL/Comms will be virtually undetectible)
    >fire control radar – mainly used in recieve mode, can be used in LPI mode to determine target coordinates, can be used for electronic attack

    There are a couple orders of magnitude difference in total radiated RF energy when comparing gen 4 and gen 5 jets.

    Here’s where I think the “generation” nomenclature falls down.

    I’m sure all of these radiation sources have off switches in the Typhoon too; an off switch is hardly sci-fi.

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578565
    Doug97
    Participant

    Yes, and most do 99.99% of the time.
    IFF transponder
    missile approach warning system (RF)
    radar altimeter
    voice comms (UHF and VHF)
    datalinks (jet-to-jet, jet-to-ground and jet-to-weapon)
    fire control radar

    If it radiates, it will be detected and can be killed or avoided.

    So the F-35 would be emitting too? Doesn’t that defeat the purpose of all the stealth technology?

    in reply to: Red Arrows #2578713
    Doug97
    Participant

    Any new news on what tranche 3 will actually include?

    in reply to: SIZE COMPARISON THREAD #2578719
    Doug97
    Participant

    Mi-26 vs. Chinook:

    http://www.segurancaedefesa.com/Mi-26T.jpg

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2578725
    Doug97
    Participant

    PIRATE is a FLIR and works in the infrared spectrum. It works only where the seeker is pointed.

    ESM = electronic support measures; works in various RF frequency bands. It requires a series of antennas and highly accurate clock that can time incoming RF signals and calculate their bearing using trigonometry. ESM can provide 360 degree coverage if sufficient antennas are used. Modern ESM can detect and classify any emitter within line of sight (hundreds of km).

    So ESM requires the enemy jet to be emitting?

    in reply to: Unmanned F-35 #2579131
    Doug97
    Participant

    Yeah I have a soft spot for the X-32 too … everyone says it’s ugly, but I love the way it looks!

    in reply to: Air Superiority: F-35 vs Typhoon #2579134
    Doug97
    Participant

    ESM is the primary sensor because it doesn’t radiate, is undetectable and provides NCTR capability.

    What’s that and how does it work? Is it anything like Typhoon’s PIRATE?

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 409 total)