Just what is it about the delta wing that made all of Europe go for it and no-one else?
How many of these could the Typhoon theoretically carry?
It’s easy to forget just how much bigger the F-15 and Su-27 are compared to the EU fighters.
I think this pic is accurate, I can’t remember who originally posted it 😮
Wow that pic is fascinating.
The more I see the Typhoon compared to the Rafale, the more I wish the French hadn’t bothered going off in the huff to play on their own. The two planes are really way too similar … the EU should compete with the rest of the world, not with each other.
Thanks! So Javelin is heavier and more expensive than Spike-MR, but on the other hand has better armour penetration?
Although I think something went wrong with that link …
Good info!
Can you tell us the relative merits of the Javelin system vs. Spike-MR?
Dammit, and here was I hoping they’d navalize the Eurofighter.
I agree, upon detection of anti-Bush sentiments the latest “less-lethal” weapons will be deployed, resulting in the insurgent in question receiving simultaneous blinding laser flashes, painful microwave heating and bowel-liquefying subsonics. A small price to pay for freedom!
Fully autonomous, “swarm-like” behaviour, the ability to repair itself, capable of dynamic learning, able to improve its own programming.
Plus, it should be able to go up stairs.
Am I right in thinking the longer the UK is delayed getting its aircraft the more likely they will be Tranche 3?
Moussez said that in technical and performance evaluations “we have systematically won against the F-15 and the Eurofighter Typhoon.”
Anyone got any details, or is this part just made up?
They might buy Rafales too.
The seeker head was planned to combine a laser seeker and and a GPS-jammer seeker.
It homes in on GPS jammers?
Why in god’s name did they put all the sensors under the nose? Surely on the roof, or even better, on a mast, would be more sensible?
AFAIK there exists only the designations EJ230 and 270 if at all. These are proposed versions of the EJ200 with hardware modifications. Within 2 stages the industry offers a steped thrust increasment of 20 % in the first stage and 30 % in the second stage.
From the Eurojet website http://www.eurojet.de/default2.php?p=4&cid=10:
The specification for the EJ200 also required a growth potential of more than 15%. This will be achievable by a number of methods, including most notably increased airflow and/or increased Turbine Entry Temperature (TET) and higher fan compression ratio, while remaining within current dimension and weight parameters. The engine core has actually been designed with an even greater growth in mind.
The Spanish company ITP has developed a thrust vectoring nozzle for the EJ200, first successfully bench-tested in 1998. This would offer advantages in terms of the aircraft’s agility and could also benefit all-up weight and drag.
Interestingly, I was talking to my brother who works for Rolls-Royce the other day. He got to sit in the cockpit of Eurofighter (the lucky b*****d), and chat to the pilots. They all agreed that the Eurofighter is the best aircraft they have ever piloted (as it bloody well should be), but that the improvement they would most like to see was more power.
Of course, the pilots then went on to say how impressed they were that the plane will accelerate straight up, so my brother suspects pilots will say they want more power no matter how much they’ve got! 🙂