Interesting! Wouldn’t the Vulcan be good for that kind of job since it can carry so much fuel in its huge delta wings? I just think that even though we are already in the realm of fairytales, trying to convince the MoD to build some whizz-bang fancy experimental airframe like the Boeing Sonic Cruiser is still stretching plausibility.
How easy is it to scale a design, e.g. “I want the Vulcan, but 20% bigger!”?
The large bomber brings a lot to the fight. Where a ground forward air controller needing air support now, is better off when…. a B-1, because it is fast might only be 10-15 minutes away, and an A-10 which is slow, might be 20 or more minutes away, where one of the most important things in unplanned CAS is response time.[/url]
I agree, you get response time, a huge loiter capability, and a huge ordnance reservoir.
So, who would go for an updated Victor, with its 35 1000lb-bomb load and 1500 mile range, and who opts for an updated Vulcan, with a 21 1000lb-bomb load but a 2300 mile range? In either case, I think the ranges could be increased by replacing the original turbojets with more fuel-efficient turbofans (Rolls-Royce, of course).
I guess either could provide the basis for a supersonic aircraft, but I would be against this as it would require a lot of extra design and mitigate much of the cost benefits of using a tried-and-trusted off-the-shelf design.
Actually the Rafale exists in more versions:
If Belgium can’t afford the JSF, they should work togeter with Denmark, Norway and SAAB on the new version of the Gripen: Gripen – Bel
The what? I can’t find anything about that on Google.
Quiet you! There’s people trying to daydream!
Is there any aircraft in the world that can carry more than one Challenger 2?
I suppose the following will be the answer to all those anomalies.
This is absolutely amazing! Why hasn’t this been done before? Icarus’s dream is finally a reality!
Can anyone with more knowledge of the physics of flight calculate for me how much thrust will be required to maintain level flight?
I guess you’d need to estimate the total weight, the lift area of the wing, and the thrust from available engines.
The article mentions using UAV engines. Anyone know the thrust you get from one of these?
I also found these:
JETCAT model turbines π
Yes, unfortunately… It is a good helicopter for liaison-flights and as a training aircraft, but for scouting, anti-tank, medevac, … This was surely a political descision and no military. It cannot even lift half the weight it is supposed to. But hey, what do you gonna do about it π
Why is it no good for scouting? How does it compare to the EuroCopter 635?
Is this really that different from a hanglider?
Well the same could be said about for instance the Netherlands, Denmark or Switzerland. Does the Netherlands really need the JSF more than itΒ΄s neighbour?
Maybe The Netherlands, Denmark and Switzerland should also save their money?
There is no carrier version of the Gripen.
There is now!
Exactly; with all these artificial restrictions the F35 IS the inferior product … you have to look at the bigger picture.
Wow! at this rate we won’t have any C130 left.
All the more room for A400s!
In the end if the UK signed the contract and the US isn’t following it they should stop b!itching and pursue legal action. If the US is following the contract and the UK has decided they don’t like it they should just stop b!tching period. Deal with it.
I agree entirely. The UK has two choices:
1. Stop bitching and accept an unsatisfactory product.
2. Stop bitching and buy something else.
I’d go for option 2 any time.
Off topic:
But I am just wondering how long will the RAF keep the Tornado GR4 and the Tornado F3 in service for?
Don’t know, but the Gr.4s at least should be around for a while judging by the upgrades that are planned for it:
Yes please, humina humina!