dark light

Doug97

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 409 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: (Notice) UK&Ireland TV programme upcoming 24/8/08 #2487524
    Doug97
    Participant

    Typhoons

    You missed an apostrophe.

    in reply to: New UK missile programme by Thales #1786102
    Doug97
    Participant

    A couple of pictures I took at Farnborough.

    [ATTACH]164164[/ATTACH]

    [ATTACH]164165[/ATTACH]

    Doug97
    Participant

    A few of these ought to be good for CAS:

    [ATTACH]164114[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: T-45 reduced to 6 uints (?) #2074711
    Doug97
    Participant

    I saw this at the BAE stand at Farnborough, thought it was interesting.

    [ATTACH]164064[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2471683
    Doug97
    Participant

    So the RAF chose the Sniper pod for the Harriers but the Litening for the Typhoon and Tornados?

    in reply to: Your favourite what-if fighter #2480506
    Doug97
    Participant

    In many ways similar to the Westland Wyvern

    I suppose, but much much faster and without a turboprop. Designed as a fighter rather than a strike aircraft.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon excellent photos #2481199
    Doug97
    Participant

    I do think though that they could have found somewhere else to put it – it makes a dirty stain on an otherwise pristine airframe.

    Ken

    I agree … if I was a country looking to purchase a new fighter that stain would make me seriously consider whether I wanted Typhoon or not. 😉

    in reply to: Airbus A.400M Roll-out at Sevilla #2481202
    Doug97
    Participant

    Well yes, that would be a good reason to bolt on a gun turret on to it… would look a lot cooler if the gun turret was in the nose though…;)

    Any chance of a “gunship version”, a la C-130 Spectre, that would be just as cool?;)

    Oh my yes, that would be awesome. What weapons would you have in it? Would an M777 fit? Or perhaps a GAU-8?

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2481205
    Doug97
    Participant

    To tell the truth, i wish Dassault had sticked with the EF program, now everything would have been easier for everyone.

    I couldn’t agree more … that way, EF would be carrier-capable and would have one less competitor, and more would be getting built.

    in reply to: Wookies overhead #2481207
    Doug97
    Participant

    Me too! 2 days ago I saw two Apache Longbows flying right over the centre of the city. I meant to post it and ask the exact same question, but forgot …

    in reply to: Rafale news III: the return of the revenge #2483844
    Doug97
    Participant

    The main EF problem if ordered today, is that we want it with the Caesar radar, something that i don’t know if they can provide us if we order now.

    Ineresting … so CAESAR really is going to be a lot better than CAPTOR could ever be.

    in reply to: CVF #2075892
    Doug97
    Participant

    For instance, the Fleet Ready Escort and amphibious roles could be shared, with Scottish units operating right alongside. Overall, I wouldn’t expect any drastic changes, just a slight alteration in the way things are done!

    That’s assuming the SNP agrees with whatever the government in London wants to do with those units, and they don’t agree with much.

    in reply to: CVF #2075898
    Doug97
    Participant

    I doubt that any independant Scotland would be looking towards any major air or naval component it does’t make any sense.

    I would think that the SNP are looking along the lines or the Irish millitary. The first thing they would want is the transfer of the Scottish devision to local command.

    How would that work, exactly? Haven’t the soldiers sworn an oath to the Queen? What would England have to gain by giving up the Scottish regiment, or any military resources, for that matter?

    I’m Scottish but you can be sure that if I was in the armed forces I would not be happy about being handed over to some other country.

    in reply to: What-if: Jet Engine Technology doesn't Exist #2484398
    Doug97
    Participant

    We can take a look at some of the proposed prop-driven designs to get an idea of where things were headed.

    http://gallery.kitmaker.net/data/18138/16SM391_.jpg

    http://gallery.kitmaker.net/data/18138/15SM391_.jpg

    At the same time Rolls-Royce was trying to develop a 2-stroke V12 engine called the Crecy that produced a theoretical maximum of 5000hp. Apparently its exhaust thrust made a significant contribution at high speed and altitude, making it a little jet-like.

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/a/ae/Rolls-Royce_Crecy.jpg

    I guess the next step after this would be to harness that exhaust thrust to drive a compressor fan, like in the compound engine.

    in reply to: Q: terrain following radar #2493371
    Doug97
    Participant

    Will Typhoon have a TFR mode?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 409 total)