dark light

Dakkg651

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 111 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Incident at duxford – crew safe #1302453
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Can someone remind me of the number of vintage aircraft accidents we have had in this country, at airshows, in the last ten years? Also, how many of these tragic losses were caused by aircrew error and how many due to technical failure?

    Perhaps after looking at these figures we may understand why the press are so quick to react to any accident to ‘old’ aeroplanes. This situation will not change no matter how many of us complain about it.

    The only way to avoid bad press such as this latest offering, is for something to be done to reduce the number of accidents.

    Now before you all bite my head off, I love to see warbirds being flown hard. The late, great maestro Ray Hanna was certainly spectacular to watch but any experienced pilot could see he was nowhere near his own limit or the aircrafts’. Look at Alistair Kay displaying the OFMC Mustang hard but smoothly and you can still see the Hanna influence. Unfortunately, I have seen so many vintage aircraft being flown spectacularly but with the feeling that either the aircraft limit or the pilot’s limit was being pushed too close to the edge. I remember watching a certain american fighter at Biggin and getting that horrible feeling of tragedy two whole minutes before the crash occured. I had seen the Mossie display four times that particular year and each time thinking that it was getting a bit too punchy.

    I am not trying to be clever but there must be a sensible way to improve safety from within the vintage aircraft movement before the Press fueled CAA force it upon us.
    I would like my son to still be able to see these wonderful aircraft flying when he’s my age.

    Now where’s my tin hat?

    in reply to: Forgotten Bombers – Avro Lincoln #1304042
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Dean

    Did you meet the famous ghost inside the Linc!

    in reply to: Hunters in Iraq #1304053
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Not just the Yanks. I know that the Tonkers destroyed at least three. I,ve seen the pave films!

    in reply to: Buried Lancasters.(2004 thread) #1304062
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Aircraft were certainly buried at Cosford post war, or more accurately the metal airframes of several types were.

    Wooden aircraft were burnt and the remains pushed into the deep ravine that runs along the western edge of the airfield. Quite a few years ago, whilst dumping glider winch cable down part of this ravine, I came across a couple of metal pipes sticking out of the ground. After attaching old winch cable from the back of a landrover to these ‘pipes’, we unearthed a complete Mosquito undercarriage unit still attached to a burnt portion of main spar. After further nosing around among fragments of melted perspex, we found the rear nacelle from the same aircraft. Being young and naive, these precious items were then pushed back down the ravine. In later years when I realised the value of our finds, I did go back down to try and find them again. No joy unfortunately.

    I hope I can be forgiven but I was only a young space cadet!

    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Interesting.

    I wonder if Tony Blair would like to take up acting when he (allegedly) steps down soon.

    Sounds like he would be ideal to play Gibson.

    Dakkg651
    Participant

    I think Richard Todd ought to have a cameo role in the new film.

    Saw him earlier in the year when he came to see the Horsa at Shawbury and he still looks pretty spry.

    Incidentally. I met an ex 106 sqn pilot a few years back, and his opinion of Gibson as a Sqn Commander was interesting. He described him as a thoroughly nasty, self-opinionated bully whose arrogance could match that of Bader.

    This of course was only one man’s view.

    Anyone else heard anything similar?

    in reply to: Airfix in trouble… #1316632
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Airfix produced a TSR2 so what did you expect.

    The government must be behind this!

    Dakkg651
    Participant

    I’ll put up with the computer generated Lancs if they get the sound of those four merlins correct.

    If Lord of the Rings is anything to go by it ought to good.

    Wonder what they will call Gibson’s non-white Labrador?

    in reply to: Bob Mitchells PT Flight. #1324592
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    The PT Flight aircraft are mostly still at Cosford in a Lamella hangar on the SW side of the airfield. I had a look in there a couple of weeks ago and was distressed to see the condition of some of them. The Vultee Valiant in particular sat there on flat tyres covered in Guano. No sign of any engine or airframe inhibition was evident. No sign of the Cornell or one of the PT22s either. I am flying at Cosford next Saturday so I will try and get some pics if the hangar is still open.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain won by Royal Navy? #1330673
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    If is a big word especially when used with hindsight a rose-tinted glasses. If the Luftwaffe could have decimated the Royal Navy in 1940, surely, by 1942, RAF Bomber Command was in a stronger position than the Luftwaffe had been in 1940. Why then, did it not decimate Scharnhorst, Gneiseau and Prinz Eugen in 1942? Same stretch of water?

    Easy

    a) The weather was sh*te.

    b) The Luftwaffe had local air superiority over the ships – something that we wouldn’t have had over our navy in the Channel in 1940 if the RAF had lost the B o B.

    Anyway Bomber Command did the biz that evening by putting both Salmon and Gluckstein out of action for months with mines laid in their path.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain won by Royal Navy? #1330753
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    From my references I found that the JU87 could carry a 1400kg AP bomb on its centreline station. These were used to bomb Belgian forts just a few weeks previous. Surely these weapons would’ve done a battlewagon a bit of no good? Indeed these same bombs almost sank Illustrious a few months later.

    in reply to: Hurricane pilot shot while parachuting? #1330774
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Ah, you’re right, it was Nicolson, not Lacey that I should have said. I believe the soldier was in the Home Guard, from what I read.

    Probably a Captain of the name of Mainwaring>

    in reply to: Battle of Britain won by Royal Navy? #1330809
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Jonathan

    Thanks for putting me straight.

    Handbag’s back in the cupboard.

    Still think these historians have got it wrong though. If the navy were so confident about operating in the Channel, why couldn’t they protect the convoys off the south coast that had to be re-directed to the Western ports? If the Luftwaffe had no AP bombs or torpedo bombers then the big ships sitting at Scapa had nothing to fear.

    Just remembered – didn’t Germany have a few U Boats knocking about?

    in reply to: Battle of Britain won by Royal Navy? #1330925
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    Which begs the question; why throw so many resources at the RAF?

    The answer Jonathan is simple.

    It is so that we can protect your freedom to voice your opinions from your armchair.

    The Army and RAF are facing ugly situations in Iraq and Afghanistan and are seriously overstretched as regards personnel and equipment.
    The Navy don’t have as much on their plate at the moment.

    We need balanced resources and more of them to meet the commitments that our beloved government have bestowed on the armed forces.

    Then maybe I won’t lose too many more friends.

    in reply to: Hurricane pilot shot while parachuting? #1330968
    Dakkg651
    Participant

    If you have read Geoff Wellum’s book ‘First Light’, it seems that James Nicholson, after baling out of burning Hurricane, was shot and badly injured in the legs and buttocks by a British Soldier just before landing.
    As if he didn’t have enough to cope with!

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 111 total)