Sounds like the machine that was at Cirencester and later went to White Waltham.
Sadly guys nothing sinister about the wind turbine damage ! a report I read recently attributed it to metal fatigue on a bolt .
An Alvis Leonides 125 from a Sea Prince
There isn’t very much money in classic aviation – BAe will take you on as an apprentice -they are advertising now . I would suggest getting a license as then you can have a good living and afford to go and look at the classic aircraft for enjoyment!
Nashio – one of the people on the BAe apprenticeship is the wrong side of thirty so you have a little way to go yet!
Sky High – I think the problem is that you can throw any amount of money at a machine to get it flying but you have to have the structure in place to keep it up there and keep people wanting to support it. I think maybe people
thought that once it was flying money would pour it -it didn’t! This can either be attributed to the recession as TVOC often cites or taking possibly a more realistic view that old bomber aircraft don’t really easily fit any demographic
for advertising when a country has been at war for a sustained time.
Couple this with the ultimatums like the now infamous ‘pay up or we scrap her’ and it easy to see why a large number of enthusiasts have lost enthusiasm for her. The current round of debate seems to centre on the wages given to her crew -all of which takes the edge off it even more when lots of people are struggling both here and abroad.
The people at Pima do a fine job -taking the Shackleton on has assured it’s long term future and whilst it might look a little weather worn her time will come. I think it’s a fine endeavour for them to consider her at all when effectively they are committing to large expenditure on a machine which doesn’t have huge significance over there!
As for the other issues – the Shackletons were operating on extension due to spar life. This isn’t something that Avro conjured up to justify their existance – it was based on the safe life they could expect from them.
Therefore in order for them to fly in the U.K on a Permit they need this issue adressing – to fly a Shackleton in the U.K you need a design authority which isn’t insurmountable. This is a perfectly reasoned approach from the CAA which is taking the view that something that was defered for operational reasons with the authority of the design authority isn’t applicable for an aircraft that is being operated basically for public enjoyment.
Sky High – As probably one of the ‘anti Vulcan’ lobby you refer to – it’s not a case of being ‘anti’ anything ‘ it’s a matter of taking an objective view of something and seeing if it adds up! In the case of the Vulcan I have long held the view that the figures don’t work and that various aspects of her future are sceptical such as the desire to end her flying life at Duxford with the IWM when they already have a fresh from service example to hand! Without wishing to prejudge it – I would be looking at finding an alternative destination for her final flight with a museum not a million miles from York being the most sensible to me and doing it soon!
Wouldn’t it be easier for the trust to publish the wage figures so people can make their own minds up rather then rely on speculation?
Inkworm – the problem is that any sponsor will base his judgement on past performance! If you wanted a positive image of your product you would have to exclude the majority of the crowd at Waddington last year for starters!
The difficulty with the Vulcan is that it has a very narrow appeal -I cannot forsee sponsors throwing money at it in a couple of years time in the same way that they havn’t already!
Yeah good idea ! Make it boring and stuffy to the extent that families don’t want to go and exclude a massive number of people who contribute to the cost of running the place.
Make a tv documentary of the recovery and restoration -change numerous parts of her and fly her . Hopefully some attempt might be made to save the B-17G on top of the gas station in the U.S at some stage!
The Auster Mk.1 i.e a Taylorcraft Plus D in civil guise is powered by a Blackburn Cirrus Minor -do you mean that particular type?
The tyre size is 6.00 -6 if that helps!
The Hurricane in question is readily identifiable as that and discussion on a forum doesn’t add value to it. Anyone interested in buying one wouldn’t be frequenting a forum looking for pointers on a value – they would be dealing with established aircraft dealers / restorers.
Regards identification of parts and the subsequent sale of said items .
I would advocate that if you can readily identify a need for said item with an existing restoration project it’s far more in line with what preservation is about to offer parts to said project – at a sensible price . As for museums pleading poverty -it’s often for the reason that they don’t actually have any money hence why my dealings with them have very infrequently involved money and often parts have joined museum projects at cost to me and not them!