Exactly what I was thinking totty. From that angle, it just looks like a 747F. Will maybe look more impressive when we get to see the raked winglets and chevron nacelles.
I wonder what size the fries are that go with it 😮
I wonder what size the fries are that go with it 😮
Chris Rock jokes in one of his stand-ups, but it actually makes some sense: start selling the bullets for several thousand pounds per bullet. Then people would seriously have to think about using them on others.
Chris Rock jokes in one of his stand-ups, but it actually makes some sense: start selling the bullets for several thousand pounds per bullet. Then people would seriously have to think about using them on others.
Please read this FAA Advisory Circular and pay close attention to Section 7: http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/list/AC%2091.21-1B/$FILE/AC%2091.21-1B.pdf. It is issued to US registered civil aircraft, but I imagine each local authority will have similar documentation to match.
Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 91, section 91.21 (found here) states:
§ 91.21 Portable electronic devices.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate, nor may any operator or pilot in command of an aircraft allow the operation of, any portable electronic device on any of the following U.S.-registered civil aircraft:
(1) Aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate; or
(2) Any other aircraft while it is operated under IFR.
(b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to—
(1) Portable voice recorders;
(2) Hearing aids;
(3) Heart pacemakers;
(4) Electric shavers; or
(5) Any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used.
(c) In the case of an aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate, the determination required by paragraph (b)(5) of this section shall be made by that operator of the aircraft on which the particular device is to be used. In the case of other aircraft, the determination may be made by the pilot in command or other operator of the aircraft.
So as far as the FAA are concerned it is forbidden and as stated previously here already, anyone not complying is in violation of these codes and (perhaps?) liable for prosecution? (onboard US registered aircraft in this instance.)
If anyone wants to read the study in to the use of mobiles aboard aircraft they can buy it here: http://www.rtca.org/onlinecart/product.cfm?id=448 – the RTCA Document No. DO-294, prepared by Special Committee 202, titled “Guidance on Allowing Transmitting Portable Electronic Devices (T-PEDS) on Aircraft”
I was under the impression that mobile phones can be used on aircraft if the aircraft is fitted with a special transmitter/receiver that (I assume) acts as a local broadcasting tower so the mobile phones aren’t desperately searching for a signal. Or something along those lines. I also seem to remember Ryanair fitted some of their aircraft with these devices – of course at a high cost to the customers.
e.g. Air NZ
True, I’m only going by what I was shown and told, but the annotation that went with pointed out that the car was off and the person wasn’t smoking so I think they attributed it to the phone. (sorry for going off topic)
Just on the subject of ‘mobile phone-induced fuel explosions’, I’m yet to see evidence of that happening as well!
When I started working in a petrol station many years ago, during training we were shown pictures from a petrol station forecourt of someone who ignited the petrol vapour around them by talking on their mobile while filling up.
ATR, maybe those pilot recorded landings were on a video camera? Or on a phone that was in flight mode? Does your phone have flight mode? If so, why don’t you just follow the rules like everyone else and switch it to that then record take offs etc?
I know of at least one airline that allows you to switch on and use any communication devices as soon as the aircraft has turned off the runway. Does anyone know why other airlines insist this is not done until the door/s have been opened?
Also, with more airlines introducing the capability to use such devices in flight now (for an extreme cost) could this lead to a common habbit of people getting used to the fact that they can leave their devices on during the flight and then after, when using a carrier that does not allow it, more people forgetting to turn it off?
Jay, I have a few suggestions. Firstly, look into borrowing or buying a copy of Rolls-Royce, The Jet Engine – pretty much a bible on engine design and has lots of information on engine improvements for better efficiency.
Look at information from airlines such as Air New Zealand and Virgin who have been conducting bio-fuel flights with companies such as Boeing and Rolls-Royce.
Look in to Pratt and Whitney PW1000G and their geared turbofan.
Look in to companies such as EcoPower and their water wash technologies.
Anything else, send me a PM. It’s my day job 🙂
On a related not Fly Buy, it made ME smile that NZ are lowering income tax and only just raising GST to 15% 😀
On a related not Fly Buy, it made ME smile that NZ are lowering income tax and only just raising GST to 15% 😀
I got some pictures at work the other day, about a guy in Texas who got sucked in to a (I think) Continental CFM56. Pretty grim. Lets just say you wouldn’t know it was a man who went through the engine if the captions didn’t say so.
On a related note, I do love that Boeing crosswind video 😀
Develop the regionals, sure. But Heathrow’s purpose is as a hub. Never mind building a ‘new heathrow’ on Boris Island, it would still cost hundreds of millions to build up other London airports to the size of Heathrow.
What does Charles de Gaulle, Frankfurt, Schipol, LAX, JFK, Dubai, Incheon have in common? They all have at least two, in most cases more, runways dropping people off and passing people through. Leave LHR as it is and people may become increasing frustrated on travel there in it’s congested state. My opinion anyway.
And on the people and their houses front……well, a lot of them did choose to move next to a major airport. And it’s not as if they won’t be relocated….