dark light

symon

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,114 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Want a cheap flight? #508136
    symon
    Participant

    Unfortunately for myself, the flight times don’t allow me to go out in the morning and come back in the evening from EDI (from what I’ve checked anyway) – the turn around time is either too short or I’d either have to stay a night. I imagine it would be ok if you’re looking to go away on a trip though ๐Ÿ˜€

    in reply to: Eva Air's fleet of 747's #508283
    symon
    Participant

    Downtime isn’t always an issue, as retrofitting can be done during D checks for example. Don’t know the time scale of it being done independently however

    in reply to: Doom and Gloom In The Airline Industry (Merged) #509001
    symon
    Participant

    Consortium withdraws Alitalia bid

    Alitalia is overdue for years.
    As the employees are the biggest problem of Alitalia, you don’t even have to be sorry for them when they lose their jobs.

    Seems as though you are right and I quite agree. Alitalia’s employees are bringing the airline down (further), pretty selfish I would say:

    A consortium of investors proposing to rescue airline Alitalia has withdrawn its takeover offer, raising fears the carrier may go into liquidation.

    The Italian group, called CAI, dropped its bid after unions failed to back the deal before a 1400GMT deadline.

    While four of Alitalia’s unions had supported the deal, five had objected because of plans to cut 3,000 jobs.

    More here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7622304.stm

    in reply to: Economical aircraft #509440
    symon
    Participant

    Generally, what is the most efficient (in terms of lb/hr/pax or otherwise) wide bodied aircraft (in service i.e. other than the 787)? Is it the A380?

    in reply to: Doom and Gloom In The Airline Industry (Merged) #510395
    symon
    Participant

    Alitalia ‘running out of fuel’

    Italy’s national airline, Alitalia, may have to cancel some flights because of a lack of funds to buy fuel, a top official has warned.

    Augusto Fantozzi, Alitalia’s bankruptcy administrator, made the comments as he called unions to emergency talks a day after the latest session broke down.

    The unions earlier quoted him as saying flights could not be “guaranteed” because we cannot “get fuel”.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7614336.stm

    Perhaps those odds do have some truth to them. Though to be fair, we all knew Alitalia has been falling down the steep, slippery path for a while. Hopefully it will be able to be rescued some how….

    in reply to: Doom and Gloom In The Airline Industry (Merged) #511072
    symon
    Participant

    Just for reference, let’s make a list of the airlines who’ve gone under recently.

    Zoom
    Futura
    XL
    Paul

    Don’t forget

    EuroManx
    Silverjet
    Oasis

    Plus Eos, MaxJet, ATA, Aloha….no doubt there’s more.

    It’s not a promising time, is it. Not an industry a lot of people will be wanting to invest in right now, which is perhaps spurring on all these closures.

    All airlines will be having to tighten their belts right now. I have been going for a job recently only to be told the other day senior management had cancelled all the open positions in the department – they didn’t say why, but I can take a guess!

    p.s. Sorry Rick, for posting the XL news in here and not in a new thread and getting you in bother with the mods! I just thought the thread title matched the news and there was little activity in it, so threw it in here ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

    in reply to: Doom and Gloom In The Airline Industry (Merged) #511280
    symon
    Participant

    Trouble looming for XL:

    Package holiday firm XL has filed for administration after experiencing financial difficulties, reports say.

    XL is the latest travel firm to face financial difficulties as the industry struggles with sky-high fuel costs and an economic downturn.

    A Civil Aviation Authority spokesman said the company currently continued to hold a licence to operate as a tour operator and commercial airline.

    He said: “It has not been confirmed to us that XL have filed for administration.”

    The carrier had already cancelled its schedule of flights to the Caribbean.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7611639.stm

    in reply to: Virgin Australia – First Shot #511474
    symon
    Participant

    In its defence, at least it is A BIT more……adventurous (?) than the bland T7 liveries of airlines such as Air France :rolleyes:

    in reply to: 2 DAYS AT SCHIPHOL AMSTERDAM 16-18/9/08 #491363
    symon
    Participant

    Great shots, good catches with the retro jets

    in reply to: Virgin To Buy Stake In Gatwick? #512899
    symon
    Participant

    Just one comment Josh, IMO, you say that it’s a shame that DL/CO/AA/NW etc have migrated from LGW to LHR. Then you continue to say that if Virgin moved in to LGW they could get them into central London by train, even though it’s further. Is this not maybe one reason why such carriers have moved to LHR – for convenience?

    Additionally, LHR is well renowned as one of the worldโ€™s largest hubs. It makes sense for some carriers to move to LHR – to offer maximum connectivity and as such, ease to passengers (seeing as LGW is not a hub). Although this is somewhat of a catch 22 scenario – what purpose does LGW serve if everyone is at LHR ๐Ÿ™‚

    BTW – I was in Vegas in July and a tour guide was telling us that Sir Richard had bought up a whole load of land down the south end of the strip (next to MGN Grand). His plans are to build a mega casino/resort in the style of “London” and also have the facility built into the airport. It is planned that when on a flight into LAS, passengers staying at the resort are issued their key while in the air and the aircraft will pull up at the resort (air side) at a dedicated gate and offload passengers where they will be cleared at customs within the resort and pass straight on through to the strip – thus bypassing the airport. If this actually happens, SRB will once again cement himself as one of the greatest entrepreneurs of the time!

    in reply to: Madrid Tragedy #513732
    symon
    Participant

    Crash plane ‘was almost swapped’

    The airline involved in the Madrid plane crash had considered switching aircraft at the last minute, a Spanish government minister said.

    Spanair flight JK 5022 was delayed for about an hour because of a problem with an air temperature gauge.

    The aircraft crashed on 20 August, just after take-off, killing 154 people.

    Magdalena Alvarez told a parliamentary panel that Spanair had “indicated to the airport the possibility of replacing the plane with another”.

    Ms Alvarez, the Spanish development minister, said Spanair “told the airport control centre that it had decided to continue with the plane… which is the one that crashed”.

    She was summoned before the Spanish Congress to testify on Spain’s air safety procedures in the wake of the accident.

    Spanair has not spoken publicly about having considered changing planes. A spokesman said the company could not discuss what had happened to the aircraft, because the accident was under judicial investigation.

    However, it has previously insisted that the gauge problem had nothing to do with the crash.

    The Spanish government has promised a full investigation into the crash, which is the country’s worst air accident in 25 years.

    Sources close to the investigation, quoted by the newspaper El Pais, say the plane may have lacked sufficient engine power during take-off.

    Video footage showed the plane travelled much further along the runway than normal before getting airborne, the paper reported.

    Hindsight…
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7589113.stm

    in reply to: Plane on conveyor, would it take off ? — HELP!! #513738
    symon
    Participant

    To be fair, I wasn’t arguing that it was definate proof, just that…..that’s what they did and that’s what happened?

    in reply to: Aer Lingus plunges into the red!!! #513744
    symon
    Participant

    Actually Ryanair owns a larger share of Aer Lingus now than does the Irish Government. It’s interesting to ponder what they would do if Aer Lingus was in serious trouble!

    That may be, but I’m guessing the Government would step in at some point to help save them.

    in reply to: Plane on conveyor, would it take off ? — HELP!! #513771
    symon
    Participant

    Thanks GA. I knew it was pushing it, but a little lightbulb apeared over my head when I watched it, as I knew it may provide something worthwile to this ๐Ÿ™‚

    in reply to: Plane on conveyor, would it take off ? — HELP!! #513890
    symon
    Participant

    Really sorry to bring this back up! But there is a good reason for it (close it back down if it is inappropriate mods).

    There was just an episode of Mythbusters on, on Discovery (5-6pm, 29th Aug 08), where they allowed a single seater, light aircraft to take off ON a large piece of material acting as a moving runway, that was pulled in the opposite direction of the plane as it took off – and matched the speed. The plane took off easily. Their conclusion that a plane cannot take off if on a moving runway……busted.

    Sy ๐Ÿ™‚

Viewing 15 posts - 691 through 705 (of 1,114 total)