A very ceremonial monoplane hangar scene
Another biplane+hangar scene
Another biplane+hangar scene
Now you’re talking, – engine porn!
A T-shirt pattern I once saw at Blenheim Society stand.
This Spitfire was neither designed nor built in New Zealand but it was one Kiwi pilot who left her in this sorry condition on the beach.
Mustangs look better inhabited.
banned*
Ah, we’re now for thinner and thinner connections, right?
R6915 was flown in the Battle of Britain by Noel Agazarian. Did you know he had a sister named Monica?
(Pic. courtesy of a certain forumite)
A band of GIs on the beach…
a band of aircraft in a museum…
The band of the 1st Air Regiment, Polish Air Force, at the unit’s base in Warsaw-Okecie in late 1930s.
and another…
Another Junkers no longer in airworthy condition.
…and another aircraft with funny spatted wheels.
It was active for the RFC, and I’m sure re-imposed in W.W.II; it would’ve certainly applied to all units of the Advanced Air Striking Force in France, including fighter squadrons, and would have been a job for the Intelligence Officer to enforce during May 1940 – so I don’t think it likely for it to have been removed during the Battle, bureaucracy being what it is. However I can well believe it might not’ve been well enforced in later 1940.
OK, did it apply to all flying? Just ops? Or maybe just ops over enemy territory?
BTW, was a similar thing in force with the army? Or was it assumed that a front line infantry or tank soldier wouldn’t have anything interesting in his pockets anyway?
The last MiG-17 (well, a licence built variant known as Lim-5) of the Polish Air Force on its last service flight, in a special scheme to commemorate this, July 1993. Note the highly appropriate code number (pure coincidence!).
Were fighter pilots/air crews really required to do that during the Battle of Britain? I have always thought this rule was to be observed when the mission objective was over/in enemy territory?
Yeah, the problem of inappropriate camouflage colours must be some 70 years old…