dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mk1 Spitfire wreckage discovered in Edinburgh #1128721
    VoyTech
    Participant

    X4560 PR-H in 609 Sqn following the landing mishap of P/O Zbigniew Olenski (Polish) on 8 November 1940.

    in reply to: Polish Fighter Pilots #1144963
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I’m trying to find out about a guy whose only name I know is his anglicised name – Stan Wilks – so I assume his first name was Stanislaw. Seemed to spend a lot of his time getting shot down in the Med. according to him, liked Hurricanes best and said he spent some time with partisans in Italy after one shoot down. Eventually married an english lass and emigrated to New Zealand. He died about 10 years ago. He was an interesting chap to talk to – wish I’d written some it down……

    Sorry, Jon, that doesn’t seem to ring a bell. I know of only one Pole to fly Hurricanes on ops in the Med, and to my knowledge he was not shot down. Anyway, his first name was not Stan and his last name was nothing like “Wilks”. Also, I know of only one Polish fighter pilot who spent any significant time with Italian partisans, but he was a Spitfire guy shot down over France, who went to Italy after he escaped from a PoW camp. His name, too, was nowhere near resembling the name you mentioned.

    in reply to: Code of conduct – Item 9 – PLEASE READ #1144964
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Wouldn’t the best solution be to start a new thread and make a link to the old one in the first post?

    Forgive if the following is non-sense for those who know (I’m virtually illiterate when it comes to computer/web things) but wouldn’ it be possible to change the forum so that each thread which has been inactive for a certain amount of time (like 6 months) is automatically locked and gets a new button (like the one we have for ‘Quote’ at the end of each post) which says something like ‘start a new thread with a link to this one’?

    in reply to: Polish Fighter Pilots #1149552
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The only Siwicki I was able to find in the Polish Air Force listings was
    LAC Leon Siwicki, 705280, born 20.12.1916, ground crew member with No. 302 Sqn.

    The Christian name that you mentioned is spelled Bronislaw (not “Broneslaw”) in Polish.

    If you are positive that Bronislaw Siwicki was a pilot, one possibility is that he had served with the army (or the navy) and volunteered for flying training towards the end of the war or shortly after it ended. In that case he would technically remain a soldier (or a sailor) until he completed his service flying training, and his name may have been lost in PAF paperwork as it disbanded in 1946.

    VoyTech
    Participant

    I remember a pub called “Angel” somewhere on the way back from Coltishall to London. I think it had some WW2 aviation-related memorabilia. It was five years ago or more that I was there, can someone confirm or deny?

    in reply to: Belfast Telegraph Fund Spitfires #1153098
    VoyTech
    Participant

    P7834 was RY-F with 313 Sqn
    P7835 was ZF-S with 308 Sqn
    P7839 was ZF-C with 308 and PK-T with 315

    in reply to: Roundel Red? #1154786
    VoyTech
    Participant

    TE184 was re-painted around 18 months ago if I remember rightly, but I think the Duxford show may have been her public debut. She’s certainly had a quiet existence since the new paint was done. The scheme represents PT396, a Mk.IX flown by Wing Commander Jack Charles.

    Well, in line with that of BM597, this scheme is based on a well known artwork from a popular Spitfire book, but…

    According to available data (e.g. http://www.acesofww2.com/Canada/aces/charles.htm) Charles returned to Canada by the end of 1944, so a 1945 2nd TAF scheme with no Sky band or Sky spinner looks a bit suspicious.

    in reply to: Spitfire crowbar & secondary markings #1155758
    VoyTech
    Participant

    None of the shots of restored aircraft seems to follow the authentic application of the note “MAKE SURE DOOR IS LOCKED BEFORE FLIGHT”. After some initial varations it seems that Supermarine and Westland settled on the layout as in the black & white shots below and CBAF on a different stencil, as in the colour shot (both are wartime). I think the Supermarine one was applied either in red or in black. All CBAF ones I have seen were red.

    in reply to: POW Camp in the garden. #1155868
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The Wynches PoW Camp opened on the site in 1939 to house Italian prisoners,

    Was Britain at war with Italy in 1939?

    in reply to: Dresden. #1155870
    VoyTech
    Participant

    My concern is the perpetuation of the hatred of WW2 and passing this on to generations essentially completely unaffected by these events.

    they were approached by a group teenagers asking them were they were from. Answering “Denmark”, they were told that they should consider themselves lucky, because if they had been German they “would have had the sh*t knocked out of them”.

    I guess it’s a bit of an exagerration to link any anti-German reaction with “perpetuation of the hatred of WW2”. While in UK I have met very similarly negative attitude of local youngsters against the French (the last war between France and Britain was some 200 years ago) and the Poles (I cannot recall any war between Poland and Britain).
    In the case you described I wouldn’t be surprised if the whole incident had more to do with a recent international football match than WW2.

    in reply to: The untold Battle of Britain #1090442
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I’m not really sure I understand the difference between the Polish government in exile and the Free French other than perhaps the Vichy government kept their gold reserves in France and the Poles somehow managed to get theirs to Britain (or elsewhere).

    The difference was that in 1940 the only internationally recognised French government was at Vichy and not at war with Germany (actually allied with it), so any Frenchman wishing to fight alongside Britain was legally speaking a traitor of his state/government. The same (albeit in a different form) legally applied to the Czechs, for example. Therefore they had to join (at least oficially/legally) British forces as foreign volunteers, rather than form their own national forces. At the same time the only internationally recognised Polish government was the government in exile based in Britain, and Polish government/state never surrendered to Germany, so Poles who wanted to fight the Germans did it in their own national forces under the official Polish government.
    Of course after allied landings in North Africa the French government situation has changed, and the ‘Free French’ forces were amalgamated with the ‘Vichy French’ forces.
    Then in 1945 the Polish forces’ situation changed the other way round after western allies recognised the communist controlled government in Poland and withdrew recognition of the government in exile.

    in reply to: The untold Battle of Britain #1094087
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Interesting thread.

    To me that throws up an interesting question in that Polish aircrew fought during the Battle-of-Britain and throughout the war in RAF squadrons. Although these are often called ‘Polish’ squadrons, to what extent were they actually Polish; were any of the aircraft paid for by the Polish government in exile, were any of the other costs, including pilot’s pay, met in this way?

    Legally speaking they were completely Polish, although falling under British operational control (in about the same manner as British troops in places like Afghanistan might fall under US operational control, for example). I believe in summer 1940, when things got hot, it took the British Parliament just a couple of days to pass a new law that made it legal for foreign troops to be based in Britain, and that was specifically to allow the Poles, the Dutch and Norwegians (IIRC) to form their own troops in UK. The Czechs and the French, on the other hand, had to join the RAF, as their own governments have (in vastly different circumstances) surrendered to Germany, so there was no way for them to form their own national forces that would be internationally recognised.
    And yes, the Polish government in exile did pay for the aircraft, fuel, ammunition, for using RAF bases etc. IIRC the final balance was something like 60 odd million pound sterling paid by the Polish government in exile.
    ‘Airmen in Exile’ by Alan Brown is strongly recommended if you’re really interested in the subject.

    in reply to: Emergency call…. #1104596
    VoyTech
    Participant

    AM design. … 24 Volt

    Probably way off topic, but since the knowledgeable men are here, a question that was posed yesterday in my presence: what was the reason behind changing from 12V to 24V electric system in WW2-era RAF aircraft, such as the Spitfire? And do any of the surviving ones still use 12V?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1106632
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Well, the same phenomenon affects other nationalities when they post in their native languages. The “culture” you mention is, sadly, international.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1106696
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Perhaps not on this thread, but I have been under the impression that native English speakers are most easily identified on this forum by their carelessness in spelling. If you can see a lot of silly misspellings then it’s usually not one of us bl00dy foreigners, it’s one of you Brits.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 953 total)