dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Lovers Turn Away…. #1112894
    VoyTech
    Participant

    but it was on the rear fuselage of a Spitfire

    Was the serial visible?

    in reply to: A Wellington with a constellation #1116172
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Thanks a lot! It seems we have the most likely answer.

    in reply to: MiG-15 airworthy in Poland (and elsewhere) #1124901
    VoyTech
    Participant

    an interesting website (with a bit of help from Google Translate!

    I think if you click the little Union Jack in the top right corner the text might be much more understandable!

    in reply to: MiG-15 airworthy in Poland (and elsewhere) #1125059
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Is there a website for the Polish Eagles?

    Try this:
    http://fundacjapolskieorly.pl/

    in reply to: Operation Dynamo and Spitfire Survivors #1136428
    VoyTech
    Participant

    N3200 had been shot down on 26 May … so … never made it to Dunkirk.

    Funny, I always thought N3200 made it very much to Dunkirk, but failed to make it back.
    http://www.aircrewremembrancesociety.com/raf1939/stephenson.html

    in reply to: Flt Lt Tony Hills PR Spitfire #1094603
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Andy, thanks for the clarification re. PR.VII/XIII gunsights. Hopefully that’ll teach me to look carefully in the AP before I write something about PR Spitfires.

    I understand Mark is working on THE book.

    in reply to: Flt Lt Tony Hills PR Spitfire #1097797
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The Type G retained its armament and presumably its gunsight.

    No, it didn’t retain the reflector gunsight. It featured only a very simple gunsight consisting of a ring applied on the surface of the windscreen and a bead mounted on top of the bulkhead.

    in reply to: War-graves A question of identification #1115816
    VoyTech
    Participant

    If he was killed outside Wangerooge, wouldn’t he be buried (if found) somewhere in that area, and not in Hamburg? I’m just saying. You could say my source is wrong, but I have a problem understanding how they would take the Poles body, transport it all the way to Hamburg and bury him the same day as he crashed. It seems like an awful lot of trouble.

    I feel you could ask exactly the same set of questions regarding Major Arne Austeen as the distance seems more or less similar.
    I understand that not all of those who are now buried at major war cemetries, such as the one at Hamburg Ohlsdorf, were buried there right after they died (and certainly not ‘the same day as crashed’). Many servicemen (including those who were not identified by their name) were buried locally at the time of their death, and were then exhumed after the war and re-buried at those major cemetries.

    in reply to: War-graves A question of identification #1115933
    VoyTech
    Participant

    My source says that the date on the stone, 4th of May, means it MUST have been him, if it wasn’t, the British wouldn’t have bothered to write it, then they would just not write a date at all, and that makes sense to me (19th Squadron and the Pole put aside)

    DCK, your source is plain wrong. I don’t know aboout the 19 Sqn pilots but ‘The Pole’ (F/Lt Leslaw Szczerbinski) was killed on 4 May 1945 attacking German shipping off Wangerooge and has no known grave, either, so I can’t see why he should be ‘put aside’.

    Second, he’s very critical towards how the British treated fallen comrades, that there’s a pattern in it, how they gave less “thought” into South Africans, New Zealanders, Norwegians etc and cared more for the pure British. A controversial opinion perhaps? I don’t know what you chaps think of it?

    I think if his research was more careful he’d have more right to say so. Or should I call it a pattern of giving less “thought” into Poles, Czechs etc and caring more for the pure Norwegians.?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1137610
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Is it really a low-wing conversion of the Piper Cub, or does it only like one?

    in reply to: Interesting photo find #1140336
    VoyTech
    Participant

    My feeling is, given the appearance of the Fw190, that the photo is more likely to be taken after the end of the War. According to the movement card SR419 was CatAC/hit by flak on 4/4/45 and then CatE on 31/5/45.

    Steve, I think Cologne was captured by the Allies some time in March 1945, so by the time SR419 landed there it was more or less ‘after the war’ in that area. Anyway, cat. E meant (if I understand correctly) just transferring the aircraft’s paperwork to another place in the files (so the squadron could get a replacement aircraft). Can we rule it out that after SR419 was declared damaged beyond repair it (or whatever was left of it) remained wherever it had been? I guess the photo may well have been taken after VE-Day.

    In my view the hood is missing altogether as I just can’t discern any framework.

    Although I agree that there seems to be no hood on the Mustang, you might want to note that the Malcolm hood used on these aircraft did not have any framework other than two rails at the bottom that attached it to the sides of the fuselage.

    in reply to: Interesting photo find #1141274
    VoyTech
    Participant

    By cross-checking the code letters in the log books of (then) F/Sgt Marian Jankiewicz and F/Lt Kazimierz Wunsche with the corresponding serials in the ORB for their sorties in March/April 1945 I have now establilshed that SR419 was indeed coded PK-D.

    Steve, is there any specific reason why you do not consider SR419 an option? It seems to me the last digit of the Mustang’s serial can be discerned under the tailplane and it looks very much like a ‘9’.

    in reply to: Interesting photo find #1142174
    VoyTech
    Participant

    PK-D Mustang Mk.IIIB (P-51C) FB225 (batch FB125-399)

    Unlikely.
    There seems to be no trace of D-Day stripes on the Mustang, so this photo was taken during late 1944 or later. The scenery doesn’t look like winter time, so probably spring of 1945 or later. FB225 was lost with the pilot, Sgt Jozef Donocik on 21 February 1945. I think this is a subsequent PK-D.
    This could be SR419 (no code known) in which Sgt Tadeusz Pertkiewicz was forced to land at Cologne (Köln) on 4 or 6 April 1945 (I have two dates so either one source has a misspelling or he landed there on the 4th but suffered another engine failure two days later).

    in reply to: Any films about Air Force escapers or evaders? #1146010
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Polish feature film of late 1950s, called “Historia jednego mysliwca” (“One Fighter’s Story”). A part of the story was of a Polish fighter pilot shot down over France, wounded, and then assisted by the Resistance in evading the Germans. The script was co-authored by Stanislaw Skalski and the story included true episodes from his colleagues, such as a wounded airman being operated by French surgeons in the morgue of a German-controlled hospital in France.

    in reply to: Hurricane P3533 #1151196
    VoyTech
    Participant

    It has been stated elsewhere that there may have been a clerical error on 607 Squadron re P3535 AF-C. This is totally wrong as no less than five 607 Squadron pilots are recorded as flying it: Will Gore, Francis Blackadder, Peter Parrott, Bobby Pumphrey and George Fidler.

    Not necessarily ‘totally wrong’. Hurricanes in France are certainly not my area of research, but I believe there were quite a few well documented cases where the serial number of a particular aircraft was repeatedly and consistently misspelled in various documents (such as both ORBs and individual pilots’ log books). As an example, 308 Sqn’s F/Lt Wandzilak was shot down in Spitfire PL279 ZF-Z in August 1944, this aircraft having been used by the unit since June, but all squadron documents only ever referred to it as PL269 (which, incidentally, was the serial of the previous ZF-Z, sent away from the squadron in June 1944).

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 953 total)