dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1174176
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Instead of blaming Britain for Stalin’s paranoid psychopathy, how about the other allies, all charged with maintaining boundarys and order; where was the US? they came out of the war no longer in recession,with Britain owing them more money than you can shake a stick at, strategic bases in Britain, Germany, west indies, and most of the captured “Nazi” technology and scientists.

    Stuart, of course you’re right about Britains rather poor condition, economically and otherwise, in 1945. I don’t think anyone can reasonably blame Britain for Stalins deeds at war’s end. (My personal opinion is that in many respects Britain was much worse-off in 1945 than Poland, compared to their respective 1939 positions.)
    The point is, however, that British politics did not start in 1945 or even in 1941. In 1939 Britain willingly declared her support for Poland should this country be attacked by Germany (as did France). Germany duly attacked Poland, Britain (and France) declared war on the invaders and then simply and completely failed to fulfil those self-assumed obligations. That’s where it all started. And my opinion is that back in 1939 Britain and France had quite serious chances of beating Germany when Hitler was very busy in Poland, just like they had those chances when Hitler incorporated the Czech Republic, or Austria before, or when he reintroduced German armed forces to Rheinland… What they lacked was not as much military power as the will to use it.

    I’d be interested to read his opinion about how Poland could have been freed in 1945…..but I doubt that they’re in the book.

    You’ll never know that until you try to read it.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1174299
    VoyTech
    Participant

    So, when Soviet influence ended Poland willingly returned the former German territory…
    …or are Polish grievances only about the territory they lost due to ‘betrayal’ and Soviet oppression?

    IIRC there was some connection between ‘the territory lost due to Soviet oppression’ and ‘the former German territory’.

    Dashing the RAF against the Ruhr in 1939 would only have speeded the (later) collapse of France, could have led to the loss of the BEF and even cost us the Battle of Britain…..depending on what forces were committed.

    In theory anything ‘could have led to’ anything. In fact I doubt your reasoning.

    since your’re taking his side…

    I’m not taking anyone’s side but my own. But I’m an old-fashioned man who thinks it might be useful to read a book before you call it nonsense.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1174356
    VoyTech
    Participant

    that’s just utter nonsense
    Is the American author (Stanley Cloud) serious?

    Probably he’s not. After all he’s just written a book, having spent several years researching it. What’s that compared to your well founded posts on a web forum…

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1174421
    VoyTech
    Participant

    ironically current day Poland actually contains much territory that was German in 1939 (thanks to the Soviet Union).

    Yes, all of Eastern and Central Europe ows a lot to the Soviet Union for changing borders and uprooting millions of people. They made sure that Poland’s, Germany’s, Hungary’s, Rumania’s, Finland’s, etc., etc. territories are going to be ‘changing’ and/or ‘disputed’ for many, many years to come.

    Treaties […] are a bluff.

    Was that a general policy of HM Government at the time?

    and the RAF would have suffered many losses.

    Well, the RAF did suffer a lot of losses anyway. My opinion is that it may have made more sense to suffer those over the Ruhr in 1939 than in retreat from France in 1940.

    The BEF was swept aside, along with the armies of France (the biggest in the world), by Germany in May 1940 after a long period of preparation (the Phoney War). In my mind it is inconceivable that the British army could have effectively intervened in the six weeks it took Germany to conquer Poland, and again at what cost.

    Well, the main difference is that in those 1939 weeks vast majority of the German army was in Poland, not facing France.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1176228
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Poland’s much changing and disputed territory

    I always thought Poland’s territory was pretty fixed until it was invaded. On the other hand, any country’s territory becomes ‘changing and disputed’ once it’s overrun by foreign forces.

    The treaty was presumably designed to prevent German aggression against Poland, one Germany invaded its intention was irrelevant.

    It’s a pity Messrs Chamberlain & Co. did not make it clear to the Poles, who thought it was all serious, for example in those paragraphs which said something about Britain attacking Germany (IIRC) with all her force within a fortnight from entering the war.

    And, as has been stated, what could Britain have done that it did not? Poland is on the other side of Germany from Britain; what aircraft did the RAF have that could even reach Poland? The effects of Bomber Command’s efforts against strategic targets in Germany in the early war years are well documented failures; Poland would have succumbed despite any effort by the RAF and that effort would possibly have brought us into conflict with the Soviet Union, at the time allied to Germany.

    That’s all very reasonable and well known today, but at the time there were people (in Poland among others, perhaps even among top politicians) who thought Britain was a powerful empire, you know.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1176555
    VoyTech
    Participant

    James, you’re right as always.
    I thought (stupidly?) that words meant what they logically meant. Did not realise they meant what UN Convention on this or that said.
    Was that EU Convention on something that said carrot was a fruit?

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1176690
    VoyTech
    Participant

    My wife is Belorussian and has been called things such as “Stinking polish” etc which in any form is racism.

    I dare say you are wrong both linguistically and politically. The English, the Byelorrusians and the Poles are all the same race, so this is not a case of racism in terms of actual meaning of words. It’s just stupidity and rudeness. And in fact I think we often unnecessarily elevate some people in their own eyes by calling them strong and serious words, like “racist”, “fascist” or “Nazi” when in fact what we deal with is plain stupidity.

    Give my regards to your charming wife.

    in reply to: British National Party – Spitfire c*ck-up! #1177707
    VoyTech
    Participant

    They obviously hadn’t watched “Pearl Harbor”. Had they, they’d know “RF” was that squadron of American volunteers, I saw it on TV!

    in reply to: Last Griffon Spitfire Flying In UK #1180010
    VoyTech
    Participant

    AND The Fighter Collections’ F22 (PK624 is it?) one day!

    I thought we were talking about airworthy aircraft?

    It was when I saw it last September. Or so they said…

    VoyTech
    Participant

    VP441
    EN224 one day, hopefully.

    VoyTech
    Participant

    Guys do any of you know how I can find the lat & long (location) present day location on Google maps of where this unit was stationed?

    I have the B### airfield somewhere in my records but I would like to find out where the airfield was located in May 1, 1945.

    Anyone have any clues on were and how to start searching for this site?

    Not sure about “this site” but if you care to look it up on a map in a book, you can try “RAF Squadrons” by C. G. Jefford. Are you looking for B114 Diepholz or B154 Rheinsehlen?

    in reply to: Finns at Mokotow Glider School in 1935 #1223328
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Very nice and interesting pictures!

    Kazimierz Plenkiewicz (pic. 15) and Romuald Szukiewicz (pic. 16) were test pilots at the AFEE during WW2.

    Unless “Ja jesien gtodny” means something in Finnish (pic. 36) it should read “Ja jestem glodny”, meaning “I am hungry” in Polish.

    The parsol winged monoplane in part 1 is a Polish RWD-8 pws.

    The registration seems SP-ANX (pic. 40) which means it is RWD-8dwl, not RWD-8pws. Oddly, this aircraft is listed as completed in 1936.

    All pictures of actual flying seem to have been taken at Polichno Gliding School (Szkola Szybowcowa Polichno), not at Mokotow (Mokotow is a part of Warsaw, just south of the city centre, where the original Warsaw airport used to be until mid-1930s).

    in reply to: What Are You All Reading Now! #1163495
    VoyTech
    Participant

    a little Aviation book shop in Tunbridge Wells

    I like that! Not sure Simon would, though…

    I am currently reading “Po wyzwoleniu” (“After liberation”), and incredible book by Barbara Skarga. As a young girl she was involved in anti-German resistance in occupied Poland. In 1944, after that part of Poland was “liberated” by the Soviets she was arrested. The book is her recollections from the 12 years she spent in gulag camps in Siberia. Strongly recommended, but you have to read Polish, I’m afraid.

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I, II and IIa's – Prop fittings #1164629
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Yes, it does look like that one.

    BTW, I like the starboard side of your Spifire!

    in reply to: Spitfire Mk I, II and IIa's – Prop fittings #1168433
    VoyTech
    Participant

    This is the same Spitfire as in Spitfireman’s post 18. The only other candidate for wheels down landing that I have come across is N3103 of 54 Sqn in which P/O Gribble landed on the beach on 25 May. That Spitfire must have alighted rather gently as two days later P/O Stevenson of 74 Sqn arranged salvage of its blind-flying panel, machine guns and ammunition boxes.

Viewing 15 posts - 361 through 375 (of 953 total)