dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Typhoon in a cellar….!! #1180666
    VoyTech
    Participant

    “A Napier Sabre under destruction testing at Napier’s own engine test facility in Acton, London” According to Ken Rimmel’s little pictorial tribute to the Typhoon. Knew I’d seen it somewhere…

    Would that be destruction testing of the Napier Sabre or of the test facility? Or should it read “A Napier Sabre underneath destruction testing (of something else) at Napier’s own engine test facility in Acton, London”

    in reply to: Middle East Stirlings? #1188282
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Perhaps the aircraft are in the dark green/grey scheme and it is the intense sunlight which is making them look lighter. All the Squadrons mentioned above were UK based during that time period so perhaps that lends itself to the theory that it is in a European scheme and just looks lighter.

    Kev, what do you mean by ‘European scheme’? UK-based transport aircraft would be finished in Temperate Land, I believe, which consisted of Dark Green and Dark Earth. I suspect the ‘dark green/grey scheme’ you refer to is Dark Green/Ocean Gray, but that was the Day Fighter scheme, which did not apply to transport aircraft.

    Here’s another picture.

    This looks more like a Halifax.

    in reply to: Help finding two Polish AIr Force books… #1193606
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I think both of the books used to be available at The Aviation Bookshop:
    http://www.aviation-bookshop.com/
    Perhaps you should ask them.
    To my knowledge a new edition of Mr Cwynar’s memoirs was planned and hopefully this will be published in forseeable future.

    in reply to: Unlikely and expensive relic? #1197134
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The official badge of the RAF No. 303 Squadron had “303” printed below the crossed “spears”. This does not mean, that they always used it on aircraft, but most 303 Hurricanes I have seen (just been browsing) has the “303” print.

    That’s a very interesting piece of information. I can’t recall ever seeing the ‘303’ in any example of the badge applied on any type of aircraft. It was introduced for the sake of the metal unit badge worn on uniforms.

    I Wonder if the seller bought this a while ago, and was “Duped” him/herself ??:rolleyes:

    He has bought it very recently, indeed. A couple of weeks ago this thing was offered on a local Polish equivalent of ebay. It reached 1000 zlotys (approx. 250 quid), but the high bidder had meanwhile consulted some people who know what Hurricanes and Spitfires look like and eventually cancelled the deal as the thing was found to be a fake. It then re-appeared on the same web auction place and went for 152 zlotys (less than 40 pounds).

    in reply to: Hmmm #1204698
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The Grace spitfire “Incident” was mentioned on a couple of different forums, this one included. however the thread on this forum had to be removed on behalf of the owner.

    This has puzzled me, really. Are you not allowed to have a thread about a minor accident like that without permission of the aircraft’s owner? Forgive me if it sounds like a silly question, but I live in a country with much less warbird activity, and may not be familiar with your regulations in this matter.

    in reply to: Help with (Polish?) Badge Identification Please! #1208119
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I am not big on badges and brevets, but a friend who is has provided this document. The badge is a memorial badge of the Polish Armed Forces’ Szkola Podchorazych Piechoty i Kawalerii Zmotoryzowanej or Infantry and Motorised Cavalry Cadet Officers’ School. As there was no Polish Air Force College in UK during WW2, PAF NCOs with cadet officer status underwent courses in that establishment before they could be commissioned, which is probably why the 300 Sqn man had it (was he and officer?). “SZKOCJA” is indeed “SCOTLAND”, because that’s where the shool was based (Dunfermline, I think).

    in reply to: Help me please. 308 Sqdn info #1209123
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Wouldn’t it just mean that he transferred from No. 308 to No. 316?

    in reply to: Help me please. 308 Sqdn info #1209161
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Quick question was it normal to merge squadrons before they were de-mobbed?

    What exactly do you mean by ‘merging squadrons’? All Polish AF personnel were assembled in the Polish Resettlement Corps (RAF) following disbandment of individual squadrons but before all the servicemen were demobilised.

    in reply to: MK356 First flight after overhaul #1213598
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Great to see MK356 back in the air. Congratulations to all who worked to achieve that!

    And also great to see yet another Polish-related scheme on a BBMF fighter – it’s three (perhaps three and a half) now.

    in reply to: BBMF Spit LFIXe pics #1226768
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Anyway what colour scheme has your Spitfire got 😀
    Fluffy

    Which one? I’ve got two…

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, what are the possibilities #1226801
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I think the issue of National Collections “recreating” or “reproducing” airframes should be limited to airframes or types of significance, and not simply to create a “missing” type in a series etc for enthusiasts like a model plane collection.

    I guess the main problem is to define what are ‘types of significance’?

    I would have thought there would be far higher priorities of “missing” types in the RAF Museum collection or even distributed National Collection than the Spiteful?

    But the same view applies to ‘higher priority “missing” types than yet another Spitfire’ which seems hardly an argument for many.

    in reply to: Spitfire at Kenley #1226831
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Mervyn Aldridge – isn’t he the owner of that ex-Turkish Spitfire, ML411.
    http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?catid=60&pagetype=65&appid=1&mode=detail&dataindex=1&owner=aldridge&pageindex=2
    That’s an ex-302 Sqn (and possible also ex-317) machine. Apparently recovered years ago but no image seems to have surfaced, yet. Or is it just another F5 case?

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, what are the possibilities #1228264
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I’m not picky. Seafang suits this threat too:D

    Or have you meant:
    Seafang threats this suit too

    that’s the only way to get extant wings (perhaps from Pakistan)

    BTW, quite a few Polish pilots went to Pakistan in late 1940s to help form the state’s new air force as instructors and leaders, but I have yet to identify any that flew Attackers.

    in reply to: Supermarine Spiteful, what are the possibilities #1228335
    VoyTech
    Participant

    With Attacker wings it would have been the Seafang rather than the Spiteful…

    in reply to: Goraszka 7 06 2008 #510839
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I don’t think I’ve even seen a ‘modern’ roundel on a picture of a pre-WW2 aircraft either. I’d be most humble if you could show me one.

    Attached are some of the most widely publicised photos of pre-WW2 aircraft. If you have not seen these, I wonder how you can claim to have any knowledge at all of markings on Polish Air Force aircraft from the period.

Viewing 15 posts - 406 through 420 (of 953 total)