dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Your favorite moment in historic aviation… #1562156
    VoyTech
    Participant

    All those “your favourite…” are difficult. So many things to choose from.
    But I think this was summer 1995. We managed to bring a real flying Spitfire to an air show in Poland, the first time ever. When F/Lt Stanislaw Bochniak DFC (then about 80) entered the cockpit he was the first (ex-) Polish Air Force pilot to sit in an airworthy Spitfire on free Polish soil.
    Exactly 50 years later than all other Allied nations…

    in reply to: Colour WW2 Pics #1562165
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Isn’t it funny, Mark how colours in these old photos play tricks?

    Photo credit: John Kenyon Collection via Mark 12

    in reply to: Colour WW2 Pics #1562175
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I have already posted this on this forum a while ago, but nothing has changed since – still my favourite colour WW2 photograph.

    in reply to: Russian aircraft part #1563455
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Skypilot,
    I talked to a friend who knows more than I about helicopters.
    The stencil should probably be read as follows:
    LOPAST N. 2P 855300-7272R
    meaning
    BLADE No. etc.
    where ‘2P’ would possibly refer to the blade type, and the longish number is the actual construction no. of the blade.

    Garry,
    warnings usually feature words like “rotor” or “propeller”, not “blade”, and they include symbols such as arrows or lines to indicate the area or plane of the danger.

    in reply to: Russian aircraft part #1563538
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The word says LOPAST’ which means blade, so this is a part of a propeller or rotor.

    in reply to: Stan Colley – an 'above average' pilot. #1563547
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Wouldn’t you say that the cannon fairings on MH795 look rather floppy?

    (Pity you didn’t add the Spits to the CD Mark ;))

    in reply to: Mosquitoes #1586267
    VoyTech
    Participant

    From the Fighter Collection Flying Legends Participants list website

    Quote:
    12x Supermarine Spitfire
    2x Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress

    I’m happy with that.

    OK, but how do I make it plural if I don’t know the exact number?
    Should I put it as “Many x Fortress”?

    in reply to: Chailey Airshow #1586281
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Fingers crossed I’ll make it to Chailey.

    I have to complain, though, that you Brits have the nasty habit of spreading your air shows over time. I had to choose between going to Chailey or to the Legends, as I couldn’t possibly make both, although I’d love to. Why aren’t they, say, two days away from one another?

    in reply to: Pre-/early-war Spitfires #1586307
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I will leave it unless you really want to have it removed.
    No disrespect to yourself but if there is one thng that does annoy me slightly (and I have to be very careful on the annoying front…;)) is when threads are deleted or posts removed; in this case the other following posts would have to go too, otherwise they have no point.
    Flood.™

    Flood,
    I agree with you on removing posts in general. I have never removed any of my posts (even if after a while I wished I hadn’t posted them…).
    However, I thought there was a good reason to remove this one: if some casual visitors to this thread had a look at that post only, without following the entire discussion, they would leave the site with the impression that the information I posted was correct. I didn’t want that to happen, that’s all.

    in reply to: Mosquitoes #1601026
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Sorry, I don’t get it. What’s wrong with Griffon?

    It rotates the prop in the wrong direction, to begin with…

    It always begins with a capital letter. It’s a name it cannot be changed. To make a proper noun plural, you just add an ‘s’.

    Does this rule also apply to the Boeing Fortress? (Just trying to improve my English, as usual.)

    in reply to: Pre-/early-war Spitfires #1601655
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Flood,
    Thanks for your comments.
    I have checked and I cannot quote a published source of my info, just a number of conversations. Obviously there must have been some confusion as to the actual person, unless someone has spread rumours aginst P/O Hardy in the past. I apologise for posting the info without checking first.
    I have removed that post. I leave it up to you to either leave it in the quote in your post (with your correcting comment), or to remove it, too.

    in reply to: Pre-/early-war Spitfires #1603026
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Have you got references for that – he is not a known name:-
    http://www.geocities.com/herrvermylen2/BFCnames.html (A list of all the names who served in the BFC)

    I believe I have. I have considered this a rather known story. But, of course, a well-known story does not have to be true. Will check that!

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1603142
    VoyTech
    Participant

    If America did have such an influence over its citizens as you say, i wonder how much of this applied to people like Billy Fiske who were half British. Did that make a difference I wonder.

    A lot of difference if they had British passports (see my first entry in the thread).

    in reply to: Pre-/early-war Spitfires #1603184
    VoyTech
    Participant

    I have removed this post. In view of what Flood said further in this thread, my information was not correct. Sincere apologies.

    in reply to: US pilots breaking neutrality #1603209
    VoyTech
    Participant

    as I understand it, anyone is free to join a foreign country’s armed forces, being technically a mercenary.

    Unless their own country’s law bans it, in which case they become criminals in their home country. I’m not sure of other countries, but a Polish citizen joining foreign military forces (such as the French Legion Etrangere, for example) breaks Polish law and automatically becomes a criminal. I think that was the case with US citizens then.

    It was none of United States ‘business’!

    Yes, it was. The US had become involved in WWI due to the incident where US citizens were killed on board a British ship. Therefore, I believe, the isolationists had the law passed that said that US citizens were not allowed to join the Allied forces, because it was feared that American deaths in the war might force the country to enter the war. Also, all young men were suposed to serve in the US forces, so by joining foreign forces they avoided that and thus broke the national defence laws.

    From what I understand (I was too young to be there) most facets of the U.S. government didn’t care about people breaking the neutrality laws.

    I remember reading a book about Eagle Squadrons which outlined this in some detail (I’ll try to find its title/author). Initially those joining the RCAF/RAF were liable to be sentenced to prison or high financial penalties (not sure how may acutally were). During autumn 1940 some sort of informal agreement was reached between HM Government and the US Administration. Basically, the Americans would not mind their young men joining the RAF/RCAF, but only provided these men were first found unsuitable for service in US air forces. This later caused some bitterness among the Eagles when the USA entered the war and they were invited to join their country’s forces. They felt that if they had been rejected by their own air force, it would be unfair to the RAF (who didn’t reject them) if they left it. You might remember that some of them never joined the USAAF (Lance Wade, for example). And some, like Hollis Hills (hope I got his name right, the man who got the first Mustang air-to-air victory for the RAF), preferred to join the US Navy, rather than the USAAF which had rejected him.

    As war continued, the generall attitude in the USA gradually changed, so by 1941 US forces actually chased U-boats in Western Atlantic (but still under the label of those constituting a threat to neutral shipping). So, when talking about US neutrality it is important to say which period we are discussing.

Viewing 15 posts - 811 through 825 (of 953 total)