dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1554559
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Mark12
    The one observation I would make about this fascinating combination colour photograph is the stencilling on the rudders.
    The two nearest aircraft to the camera, of different hues, both have the sub-contractors drawing number stencil above the W/T stencil. With in-service resprays this number usually gets oversprayed and not re-applied.

    Could it mean they were resprayed at major overhaul facilities (where this sort of stencilling would be applied as a rule)? If it was so, this would mean that not only in service repaints were likely to use non-standard hues.
    Unless off course the darker grey on two of the Spitfires is Extra Dark Sea Grey from FAA stocks, for example, making it a rather non-standard camouflage scheme combination.

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1554563
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Mark V
    As we discussed in a previous thread I believe the only reasonable path to take is to obtain colour chips of the relevent British Standard colours (most of the wartime ones still appear on the list) and to use these where indicated on the factory drawings. Only in a special case where one might be trying to re-create a particular aircraft in an unusual or particularly weathered scheme would I suggest that it was reasonable to deviate from British Standards. Of course there remains the probability (as suggested by Mark 12) that, say, Medium Sea Grey paint at Castle Bromwich was different from that being used at Westlands for example. In my opinion it is the intention that the colour should have been British Standard Medium Sea Grey that is the over-riding factor, regardless of the possibility of local deviation.

    Well, Mark, yes and no.
    Yes, I agree that warbirds should be finished in standard schemes as laid out in regulations (including colour hues) unless we have some sort of documentary proof that a particular aircraft did not conform with these.
    No, because in certain periods, areas etc., it would be unusual to see aeroplanes in regulation finish, so it can be reasonable assumed (when painting a warbird) what they looked like in reality. For example, early Castle Bromwich built Mk Vs were unlikely to be seen with proper Ocean Grey on upper surfaces, because they all left the factory in Temperate Land (brown and green) and were repainted in service. Thus, many of them (most?) would have an incorrect hue of grey.
    Leaving the Spitfire aside for a moment, there was a very interesting article by Dana Bell in Scale Aircraft Modeller (last year I think) about the Olive Drab ‘standard’. He has shown evidence that the ‘Olive Drab overall’ finish looked like disruptive camouflage on some types, because various subcontractors used ‘Olive Drab’ paint from various makers, and there never really was any definitive standard for the colour, even with factory-fresh paint.

    Bottom line is that I’d rather not complaint about hues of warbird camouflage colours being ‘non-standard’. As long as it is grey or green where it should be, it’s OK with me.

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554573
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Firebird
    I don’t know about Daz, but from my point of view these are excellent, the first and third photos in particular. I’ve lived all my life but a few miles from RAF Northolt, and used to be on base often in my youth.
    Any chance of having a copy of the original scans, to print out, as I might try an do an ‘After the Battle’ style photos of these, although the base contacts I once had are no more, but it’ll be worth the try.
    The high tree line in the background of the first photo is pretty much unchanged today, apart from the trees being a bit taller now of course:D
    The third photo showing the location of the western dispersal areas is very interesting, in fact the area in the immediate foreground might even be now outside the current perimeter fence close to where the A40 was re-aligned a few years ago, which incidentally is noticeable by it’s complete absence in the first photo:D

    Firebird,
    I will PM you about the bigger-size scans.
    I might be able to help you with current contacts on the base.
    Perhaps you can help me with one thing: the hangars (visible in the last photo) were camouflaged during the war, to look like a row of houses and gardens. I presume that the dark parts were green, but what was the colour of the pale areas?

    Originally posted by Mark12
    Perhaps you should ask Firebird to do the Malvern Avenue, South Harrow, then and ‘NOW’ shot of the Spitfire crash.

    Mark, you are right (as usual).:)
    More photo scanning for me… 🙁

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554760
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Will any of these do, Daz?

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554762
    VoyTech
    Participant

    …UNDER THE WATCHFUL EYE OF THE ERKS
    (315 Sqn, Northolt, late 1942)

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554764
    VoyTech
    Participant

    …RAISING CLOUDS OF DUST…
    (316 Sqn Mk Vs, Northolt, early 1942)

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554766
    VoyTech
    Participant

    OK, the second:
    …SQUADRON SCRAMBLES NICE AND CLEAN…
    (316 Sqn Mk IXs, Northolt, early 1943)

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554770
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Am I the only one who cannot see the picture?

    in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1554802
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by YakRider
    Will this do?

    YR

    I’m afraid I’ll never beat this in terms of authentic colours 😉
    Anyway, here comes my stuff.
    First
    SCRAMBLE!!! FEARLESS PILOTS RUN TO THEIR SPITFIRES…
    (Staged photo, 303 Sqn, Kirton-in-Lindsey, August 1942)

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1554820
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Flood
    Hmm, could be wrong or my answer might have nothing to do with this debate, but I believe that these Spits are all with the FAA, probably 761NAS and very probably in late 1942 (AR238 was with 761NAS between 9/9/42 and 20/1/43-ish, and K9969 was with 761NAS from about 11/42 untill going to 45MU in 11/9/44 – Air Britains Fleet Air Arm Aircraft 1939-45). Anybody disagree?

    Flood.

    Flood, you win a cookie!
    Anybody willing to say that these Spitfires are in the Temperate Sea scheme with Sky undersides, as would befit FAA fighters?

    in reply to: Proposed visit to Swedish AF Museum #1555561
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by JDK
    Haven’t you got any work to do?

    Waiting for a bunch of guys to proof-read a text before I can get back to it again…

    I’m avoiding mine…

    Don’t avoid your work, somebody might be waiting for you to complete it before they can do theirs!

    in reply to: Proposed visit to Swedish AF Museum #1555573
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by JDK
    Voytech, I’m ashamed of you!

    You should know better.

    No, actually hoping for something that wasn’t made in the UK or the US or licence built, just something very different and original. We’ll have the Spitfires and Mustangs too, of course…

    Cheers

    JDK
    I still think a Saab B-17 and a Boeing B-17 flying in formation would be worth seeing. Only half of the duo would match your criteria, but you cannot have everything, can you?

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1555593
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by JDK
    Henry Ford – “Any colour you like as long as it’s black”

    VoyTech – “Any colour you don’t expect” 😀

    ERRATUM
    Last line should read
    VoyTech – “Don’t expect any colour”

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1555611
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Janie
    I guess the point I was looking for is, are these the colours in which the aircraft left the factory or could they have changed colour since leaving the factory?

    Very good point Janie!
    They are all very well worn Mk Is so it is unlikely they are in their factory applied colours.
    But, the question of “could they have changed colour since leaving the factory?” is a tricky one. I think Mark12 has discussed that in an earlier thread. Basically, repaint or not, every Spitfire would gradually change colours within weeks of leaving factory.
    My point was, if you see a number of Spitfires, and they are all the same colours, this means:
    – a factory shot
    – air force unit about to be inspected by a high ranking officer or official (these are easily recognisable: usually the grass and tree leaves will also be painted regulation Dark Green)
    – CGI or a cinema film shot (or both)
    – colour plate in a modellers’ book
    – a modelling contest
    – something’s wrong with your eyesight

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1555682
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Janie
    JDK

    May I ask in what year this photo was taken?

    Thx, J.

    Janie,
    I posted the shot, so I’ll save JDK the trouble. I do not have the exact date (altough I think I have seen this photo in print somewhere, so a date may have been quoted), but it certainly is late 1942 or later, but probably no later than 1944.

Viewing 15 posts - 871 through 885 (of 953 total)