dark light

VoyTech

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 953 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire scramble #1555689
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Daz,
    I have a photo or two that might suit you, but they are at my home, so I would have to go there, find them, take them out, have them scanned, then come back here and post them. I assumed, when I saw the post yesterday, that by today’s afternoon this thread would be full of pics, so I didn’t bother
    Now, I am sorry to see you are left abandoned by everyone.
    If you tell me what’s the intended use I’ll try to find one for you.
    V.

    in reply to: Proposed visit to Swedish AF Museum #1555701
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Mike J
    And can we please (pretty please!) have one for Legends this year!

    Hoping for two B-17s flying together?

    in reply to: What's hanging on your walls? #1555702
    VoyTech
    Participant

    My computer room has all walls occupied by bokshelves etc., but I have a wall in my ‘aviation room’ that has only nice aeroplane photos on it. There are seven framed A3 enlargment prints of WWII photos of fighters (303 Sqn Hurricane I, 302 Sqn Hurricane II, 315 Sqn Spitfire II, 317 Sqn Spitfire V, 302 Sqn Spitfire XVI, 309 Sqn Mustang III and 303 Sqn Mustang IV), surrounding the photo (hopefully) attached here.

    This is a really treasured souvenir: signed by Francis Gabreski (who flew a PK-K coded Mk IX during his exchange tour with 315 Sqn) and Tadeusz Sawicz (who commanded no. 315 at that time and PK-K was his assigned Spitfire).

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1555704
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by JDK
    What’s your bid on ‘colour never seen on a Spitfire’?

    Golden!

    Originally posted by Mark V
    although the roundel sizes and camouflage lines are correct all the colours are wrong. It was done to a black and white line drawing supplied by me with the proviso that the new owner contact me directly to borrow my colour chip book.

    Mmmm, I smell the Historically Accurate Spitfire Camouflage Colour debate again 😉
    Tell me Mark which grey in the photo below matches your colour chip book?

    in reply to: Spitfire Colour Question #1556176
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Ant Harrington
    The yellow stripes were indeed a recognition feature,introduced in 1941 along with the duck egg green spinner and the ‘day fighter band’ around the rear fuselage of the same coulour.

    Only the yellow wing leading edge stripe was introduced in August 1941 when the camouflage of Fighter Command aircraft was changed from Temperate Land (Dark Green/Dark Earth plus Sky undersides) to Day Fighter (Ocean Grey/Dark Green over Medium Sea Grey).
    The Sky spinner and rear fuselage band were introduced in November 1940.

    in reply to: Bridge too far aeroplanes #1556891
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by mike currill
    I did notice that MH434 playing the recce spit in the early scenes had her cannon and thought no they can’t honestly expect anyone with more than half a brain cell to be lieve that is a recce aircraft.

    Wouldn’t tell that in front of 16 Sqn veterans (hello to Jimmy Taylor!) who flew photo-reconnaissace missions in FR.IXs. There are quite a few photos of these Mk IX, still with their cannon (they were armed on sorties sometimes, I think), being operated by this dedicated PR unit. 16 Sqn actually distinugished itself during ‘Market-Garden’, so the only thing inaccurate about MH434 in the scene is that she should have been painted pink, as no. 16’s Mk IXs were!

    in reply to: Bourget Air and Space Museum #1556901
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by Whitley_Project
    You can always ask for a Royale with cheese 😉

    I thought we were only allowed to quote aviation films here?

    The best way to find a good restaurant in France is to look for a place where they don’t have a menu in English. You will not always know what you are going to eat, but you will be certain they are not tourist-oriented. (A menu in German or Japanese is not a good omen, either.)

    in reply to: Spitfire cockpit pictures #1556980
    VoyTech
    Participant

    and the other side.

    in reply to: Spitfire cockpit pictures #1556984
    VoyTech
    Participant

    another shot of the same cockpit…

    in reply to: Spitfire cockpit pictures #1556988
    VoyTech
    Participant

    But…
    I have also found three photos that I have copied a long time ago. Are you able to tell me what is this thing in place of the gunsight, and why is it there?

    in reply to: Spitfire cockpit pictures #1556992
    VoyTech
    Participant

    The only other standard Spitfire cockpit photo I found is this 1941 shot of a Mk II. Even less can be seen…

    in reply to: Spitfire cockpit pictures #1557012
    VoyTech
    Participant

    You are not fogotten, Puukka!

    The closest I got is this drawing of a Mk IX cockpit, made by a Polish Spitfire pilot, Sgt Jerzy Glowczewski, in November 1944. Does it help at all?

    in reply to: More mystery parts inc. PROP and a CANOPY! #1559148
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by dhfan
    Knowing very little about early Spitfire canopies and never having seen one other than in photos, didn’t the flat top ones also have flat sides? It would seem a bit odd to blow the sides and keep the top flat.
    I’ve always understood that what we know as the “standard” Spitfire canopy is the Malcolm hood.

    I believe there were several Spitfire canopy shapes, each of them standard at one time or another. The initial ones were flat on top and on sides (a curved sheet of perspex). Then there were those bulged on top with flat sides (like the one in this thread). And then there was the Malcolm hood.

    in reply to: More mystery parts inc. PROP and a CANOPY! #1559891
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by DazDaMan
    I’ll go with Bruce, it’s an early Mk1 Spitfire canopy, similar to the one fitted to K9942, unless I’m mistaken?

    I think you are. This canopy is clearly bulged on top. The earliest Mk I canopies had flat top and I think K9942 has (or at least was supposed to have) a ‘flattop’ canopy. I would say it is a later production Mk I or early Mk II canopy.

    in reply to: Spitfire Plans #1559895
    VoyTech
    Participant

    Originally posted by coanda
    ps..what was the (rough) build ratios for spits versus hurri’s? i understand that you could build more hurri’s in the construction time of one spit?

    I suppose you would have to quote which Hurricanes and Spitfires (version, maker, timeframe) you have in mind.
    The original pre-war contract for 310 Spitfires took over a year to complete. In June 1944 the Castle Bromwich Aircraft Factory alone completed some 300 Spitfires in one week.

Viewing 15 posts - 886 through 900 (of 953 total)