How do swing wings like the F-111, Tornado, that have pylons on the swinging portions of their wing, manage to switch to the other wing settings? Do the pylons all swivel to match the sweep angle of the wing?
Looking at this F-111 and the loads on those pylons, the mechanics of swiveling all those pylons with such heavy loads on them must be incredibly complicated.
Here’s a good breakdown of that Lockheed propaganda.
Yeah sounds like….
Israeli Advisors, and naval buildup
The Israeli’s are known for selling arms to the Georgians (it was an Israeli made drone which the Russian’s shot down a few months back). And apparently the Georgian forces are currently operating with Israeli military advisers.
“DEBKA, the Israeli strategy and military site, states that Israeli military officers are advising the Georgian armed forces in combat operations and that 1,000 Israelis are in-combat on the side of Georgia at this time.” (Also reported in Israeli newspapers)
Given Georgia’s close relations with Washington, and their apparent ties with Israel. Isn’t it possible that this entire conflict is a distraction for the Russians while the US and their allies bomb Iran? Especially considering the US buildup of naval forces in the Persian Gulf.
“Two additional United States naval aircraft carriers are heading to the Gulf and the Red Sea, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper Kuwait Times.”
OK interesting views on the second part … what about the first part regarding refueling all the USAF aircraft including the Osprey?
I’d worry about the helicopters more, the Osprey can easily refuel like any other plane. So long as it’s got an extended refueling prob, I think it can refuel like any other plane. That’s the beauty of the Osprey, it’s got speed like a plane and hovers like a helicopter.
They’re huge winglets!
They look mighty big. You’d think the additional drag would outweigh any possible gains in efficiency.
Isn’t anyone else suspicious
I mean in the Pope flew home on this exact aircraft last week, that’s highly suspicious. It wouldn’t be the first time a bomb went off late. Take the Tokyo explosion which killed two baggage handlers, that was caused by a bomb going off at an unplanned time. Isn’t it possible that this near disaster was actually intended, and was meant for the Pope?
It doesn’t look like a faulty 747 cargo door, although that design has been troublesome for their entire life, this hole is far from any cargo door. Maybe a faulty service panel, but I think the whole was caused by something else. Any signs of an explosion may have been blown out and dragged away by the decompression and wind sheer.
If this is indeed the plane the Pope flew on, I’d look there. He’s certainly a target for wackos.
Thanks – that’s some good info
Thanks PLA Wolf, that was very informative, and helpful. I didn’t know they used a GM tracked vehicle as the basis.
Turret
I guess if it wasn’t for the engagement radar on the front of the turret, they could simply do without the rotating turret, thus doing away with all the equipment necessary to make the turret rotate. That would give them more room to stack missiles into the vehicle. But because the engagement radar needs to be turned towards the target, the turret needs to rotate. Why not mount the engagement radar on it’s own turning mount, like the tracking radar?
Missile bin
So the missiles are stacked in two rows of four, and the bin extends down into the chassis of the vehicle. So the bin must rotate with the turret, and the lower half of the bin which is in the chassis, must rotate in some sort of circular mounting? Complicated….and not a whole lot of shots available, how long does it take to reload? I saw a picture of them reloading a stack of four, it doesn’t look fast. Are there special purpose vehicles for reloading and carrying spare rounds?