I think the problem with the BREXIT argument is that nobody really knows how it will affect them, good or bad.
The Labour campaign is far more direct; people understand how much their university fees will cost, people understand how much their energy bills are, people understand how difficult it is to buy a house…
…people also know that there are people richer than them (and who don’t deserve to be richer than them)!
Ironically, the Labour success is all about selfishness and jealousy!
Yep, it’s an appeal to thick people.
Today both May and Corbyn have spoken about Brexit. May still has given no policies, Corbyn mentioned a few things like prevention of undercutting of UK wages and conditions through imported cheap labour via strict labour market controls and guarantees on the rights of expats in both directions
If the tories still wish to make it about personalities (though with May still in ‘malfunctioning robot’ mode that is backfiring badly), check Corbyn’s point about the Brexit negotiation teams.
John, I think the British people are a bit less dumb than you think and somewhat resent being told what an election is and isn’t about, preferring to decide that for themselves.
A negotiation is a fluid situation, you cannot tie yourself down with policies up front. It’s about reacting to the negotiation as it progresses.
The Tory argument is to tell those with very little to begin with that opposing their being further screwed over is bolshie and ultimately selfish, and that those that support their case are ‘class warriors’.
Maybe not so much their policy as the braying cliche of their supporters.
The problem is that if people don’t seem to care whether the money that leaves their pockets is fairly redistributed they are called selfish and if they do they are called jealous class warriors.
Somehow the wealthy are just called wealth creators when it leaves their pockets, wherever it goes. Funny old world, eh?
See my point on corporation tax. Reduction led to 25% more being collected. And if you want poor people to be richer, first they need jobs, then they need low tax.
Also wise not to determine what happened from the ‘Unofficial Rafale Blog’, or frankly any blog, or anything non-official.
Those EFT’s were likely empty since we know that it was first in and last out based on a source very familiar with the exercise .
They sent the EFTs in first to neutralise the threats and make sure it was safe for the other aircraft.;)
(Is what I would say if I were a deluded fan boy.)
Reduction in corporation tax led to £56bn being collected rather than £44bn.
https://www.ft.com/content/ca3e5bd2-2a7e-11e7-9ec8-168383da43b7
It’s beginning to look like that Truce in 1953 was a bad idea.
I had more in mind something like a huge 100MW ground-based laser taking out warheads 1000+km away in space and something like HAARP being used to fry the electronics in incoming warheads. I was talking more about immobile land-based defence at key sites.

The VLS volume on the CBG exists precisely for this protection (among other things). SM3, SM2/SM6, and in a few years even the ESSM would be able to cover an ASBM envelope. This is far less critical than a potential saturated attack on SoKo or Guam.
In terms of defence of land targets from a major attack. How realistic is building a huge phased array laser on the ground and could a massive quantity of direct, focused electromagnetic radiation destroy a warhead’s ability to detonate?
But the R-27K didn’t need to be very accurate, with a 1MT nuclear warhead and all. But then, maybe Kim’s SCUD-ER is also employing a nuclear warhead, although likely not of that yield.
European shares hit by worries over Greece and Italy, as US confidence dips – as it happened
European shares fall as geopolitical fears grow
Europe’s stock markets have closed for the night, with the main indices losing ground.
The FTSE 100 and German DAX both fell by around 0.25%, while France’s CAC shed 0.5%.
Worries over Greece’s bailout haven’t faded, despite Alexis Tsipras hitting the phones in an attempt to reach a political solution with Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron.
Bild’s report that Greece might simply decline its next bailout loan, triggering a new debt repayment crisis this summer, has alarmed some traders – even though it has been robustly denied by Athens today. It’s a reminder that Greece’s debt crisis hasn’t gone away, with no sign of a serious debt relief deal.
Predictions of an early general election in Italy has also given investors some concerns.
Jasper Lawler of London Capital Group explains:
Talk that Italy will spice up Europe’s political landscape again with its own snap election is unsettling the idea that Europe is now free of populist risk in 2017. Former Italian Prime Minister Renzi has suggested Italy could hold simultaneous elections with Germany in September. Not to be left out, Greece may opt out of its next bailout if debt relief deal isn’t struck, adding to the potential for market disruption.
European assets need the three pillars of stronger economic data, higher political risk in the US and reduced political risk in Europe to outperform. Italy and Greece could are holding the sledgehammer that could knock down one of those three pillars.
What happens in France is the responsibility of the French…
What kind of reply is that? We all face pretty much identical issues when it comes to terror.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4556294/Corbyn-blames-bad-HANDWRITING-two-Es-level.html
Corbyn blames his bad HANDWRITING for two Es at A-level as he gives relaxed performance on BBC One Show (but wife Laura stays away)
At least the dog didn’t eat his homework.
If someone goes to Syria, all you have to do is stop them getting back in and then ta-da, deported at zero cost. Then all you need is a Reaper drone in the correct place and you can deport them from Earth to Hell.
Yes, and it spread by blaming somebody else for all their problems!
And what has that got to do with people blowing up concerts, flying ISIS flags and laughing at terror victims?
The fact that the people conducting the attacks are on the Security Services ‘radar’ is an indication of the excellence of the intelligence gathered by the Security Services; it is not an indication that anybody ‘knew’ that any of these people were going to carry-out these attacks. Anybody can be wise after the event!
Legislation already exists to prevent ‘known’ attacks from being carried-out; it has been used, it works (most of the time). But it isn’t 100% reliable, nothing is!
And in trying to make it ‘more effective’ you risk alienating the sources of intelligence that make it as effective as it is now.
Seriously dude. He travelled to Syria. The Bataclan attacker fired an AK at police, was released on bail, travelled to Syria, arrested again on return, then let go. They know alright, they just don’t have the required powers to take them out of circulation.
If they reported them, chances are they’d like them out of their community too. Let’s face it, someone, especially a Muslim, would not take the matter of reporting another Muslim for terrorism lightly.