dark light

Flying chick

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 289 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flying Schools in Norfolk #432695
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Suprisingly close to being on-topic. You can’t learn from an unlicenced field, hence the number of licenced fields is very relevant to your query.

    Moggy

    You’ve got Weaver syndrome – ‘licensed’ is correct in this case!
    😀

    in reply to: What do you all Fly? #432697
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Vigilant Motor Glider (Grob 109b if confused) 🙂

    Did my first solo in one of those when I was 16 – aaahhhh, that was a good day!
    🙂

    in reply to: What's your best trip ever? #432705
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Well FC, I seem to remember following your better half (not Ruprecht) and ol’ Big Nose Barrell through a practice display and watching better half pull up to miss some rabbits! :diablo:

    Cheeky! 😮
    Don’t you mean my nearly-as-good-as-me half????

    in reply to: Flying Schools in Norfolk #432707
    Flying chick
    Participant

    There was a short grass strip cut outside the peri-track, but as Dave suggests, I don’t think it is used now(?)

    It certainly was a couple of years ago – some guy was leasing it. Couldn’t say whether it is now though.

    in reply to: What do you all Fly? #432715
    Flying chick
    Participant

    No, you’ve just got us confused with kids tv! – Mr Brothers and DP to the rescue!!!

    in reply to: What do you all Fly? #432775
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Ps. has everyone had a bit of Vicky??

    in reply to: What do you all Fly? #432777
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Now, now boys thats enough squabbling for one day! Behave yourselves!

    in reply to: What do you all Fly? #432834
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Not very much at the moment 🙁 Got my sights set on a Pitts though for the future 🙂

    in reply to: Flying Chick & Robert Weaver #432867
    Flying chick
    Participant

    It is very true – Robert and I are indeed married. Only the story is slightly different than he tells it. Yes, we did honeymoon in Florida and yes, we did go flying but unfortunately I had to be the captain as I am the only one in this marriage with a licence. I let him have a little go though, even taught him medium level turns bless.

    I am currently setting legal proceedings in motion in a desperate attempt to have the marriage annulled. I was under the influence of class A drugs during the ceremony and thought it was a hallucination – imagine my shock when I woke up the next morning.

    😉

    in reply to: Replica F6F Hellcat #433054
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Daz. Why don’t you go down to a flying school and discuss this really important issue with a qualified instructor? The forum is a great place for information, but I would not want to make any life-changing decisions based purely on this bunch here!

    Love you all really!

    Finally, somebody with some sense! 😉

    in reply to: First Flight #433075
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Agreed! Neil Williams might have been called a ‘natural’ but it didnt stop him flying into a mountain did it?!

    I’d done quite a bit of gliding and passenger flying before my PPL and I was surprised by just how damn hard it was!! It was a lot of fun too though!

    Good luck, I hope you make it to a licence soon. FCx

    in reply to: Replica F6F Hellcat #433077
    Flying chick
    Participant

    I just get upset with people who try and put people off things unnecessarily – you have been strangely defensive yourself and dreamt up some spious mathematical reasoning to try and put people off. maybe it comes back to what someone else suggested – that pilots don’t want to masses to have access to what they do – who knows?!

    I know several groups that have got low houred people in them actually. Don’t see that 45 hours makes any difference to 32 in terms of experience. Specially as you’ve had your instructor sat next to you for most of that time.

    Think I’d better leave this one alone now. You clearly don’t think my input is of any value, and there’s no point arguing with people who arent listening. I’m happy with my 2 grand saving, it has meant that I could afford a licence and thus opened the doors to lots of opportunities. Without this system I would still be dreaming of my PPL. The NPPL has pros and cons but I don’t think it should be ruled out as an option. Thats not defensive is it? Just honest.

    in reply to: Replica F6F Hellcat #433083
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Simple fact is that you do save that amount of money. With the difference you could buy a share in a cub for say a grand and fly for thirty quid an hour. Thats no more ridiculous than your assertions about money.

    I think I have actually given a fair assessment of the NPPL/JAR system. Both have their values and if the NPPL will encourage more young people into flying then I’m all for it. It just seems a shame that some estalished pilots dismiss such initiatives because it’s different to what they did. People need to be able to make their own choices looking at the options not have other people’s misconceptions shoved down their throat. I’ve tried to give Daz both sides of the story. Yes, the NPPL will save you money (thats clear) but it is a pain to upgrade etc etc. All you have done is to to rubbish it without any due cause and make your own prejudiced position quite evident in a one sided way.

    Daz, there are simple advantages and disadvantages to each option. You have to make a decision based on your personal needs and financial position. Its as simple as that I guess. I’ve tried to outline some pros and cons for you but people seem to think that it’s me being biased so I’d better leave this one alone now!

    in reply to: Replica F6F Hellcat #433088
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Look Moggy, for you a large amount of money might not be an issue but i can promise you that for a lot of people it is an issue and it certainly was for me. I was fortunate enough to have an air league scholarship for twelve hours but I still struggled to find the money. The extra money for a JAR licence would have made it pretty much impossible for me to do it. It also would have taken me longer to save up the money, therefore, due to lack of currency I probably would have had to spend yet more money. I now have a document that says I can fly a plane and it cost me a lot less to get it than it could’ve done. If money is no object then, of course, do the JAR one but if it is then the NPPL makes life a considerably easier.

    Besides, I think you and I might have different ideas about fun. Trawling around the skies in a 152 for 5 hours of instrument flying is not my idea of a great day out. And I think it would be wise of you to remember that we’re not all in a position to be as flippant about money as you seem to be.

    in reply to: Replica F6F Hellcat #433093
    Flying chick
    Participant

    Saved me two grand – good enough reason in my view. Particularly as I will probably never need or want the privileges granted by a full JAR licence. I’m not saying its right for everyone and it certainly has its faults but it has to be a good thing if it gives people more options and therefore more opportunity to fly – doesn’t it?

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 289 total)