Putting a different viewpoint on it, maybe its a good thing that Britain retains some copyright on our history, it might prevent the Chinese from coining it in, who have no respect for us or our history. Of course this might not be the case.
My first spitfire was High Back Mark 16 TB752 at Manston when I was about 5 years old in 1969. This was when the aircraft was outside between a Canberra and a Javelin. The cockpit was sealed up with black masking tape and I remember this as my Uncle used to lift me up to look inside.
It was poignant for me years later when I was a teenage volunteer at the Sittingbourne and Kemsley Light Railway and on one of our outings that I saw the Spitfire being restored at Rochester airport. It was in a freezing cold tin shed on the airport and It was the first time I realized how small the fuselage was compared to the bulk of the engine.
Not quite the same subject but the German underground V2 factories shown on youtube make interesting viewing especially this one showing a factory in the Harz mountains complete with rocket engines lying in the tunnels.
Outstanding story well told by the film makers.
It did raise one question in my mind which I have no doubt will be answered in record time here. It featured the stock footage of Lancasters taxiing out past a hangar in colour which has been shown many many times, usually when talking about the 1000 bomber raids. But where was it shot?
Thanks in advance
It was Hemswell and if you want a lot more of that you need to get hold of the colour wartime film called ‘Night Bombers’ Ive got it on VHS and superb is it too.
One surprising omission [ unless I missed it ] there was no mention of the pioneering efforts of Sydney Cotton and Spitfire Photo reconnaissance?
Maybe that would have made the program too long.
Im living only five miles up the road from it now and was there recently, the ‘runway’ didn’t look long enough to my untrained eye? Anyone know what the flying plan is?
Thanks for the tip Rob, having enjoyed seeing her at numerous airshows Ive made a donation.
Nice cowling work by Steve Moon. He was doing the air intake at the same time he did the cowling on my Rearwin.
Steve is a good man
Yes he must be very good to work off photos to create this super job.
Yes I agree, Hendon has become like the rest of North London, so a move away[ Not likely] would be beneficial, I have never found it that easy to get to from central London, it always seems a long trek. The museum has taken on a different air from the outside, it used to be a slick neat looking building with a bit of class but with all the extensions it looks a mess architecturally rather like a hospital that has had lots of extensions.
I totally agree, I think it was the fact that they were used mainly as a Photo reconnaissance aircraft in the last few weeks of the war, so out of the way really.
If you want a fantastic model of one MDC do a nice very detailed 1:32nd scale resin kit of one.
I get there in the end!!!
Thanks for the Pics Tony, A picture tells a thousand stories, Something I never noticed on all the pictures of Spitefuls I have looked at is that the rear of the Canopy has no lower metal cladding. On looking at the pictures again I can now see it! A very unusual set up and quite flexible? Is that rod from one side to the other original? if so there must have been a slot from one side of the fuselage to the other?!?
Graham.
Where have I heard that before? :rolleyes:
Seriously, did the UK ever have a realistic (that is likely to be financed) manned space program planned?
Seriously would you put money into a space program when you could role over in bed and gamble other peoples hard won pension pots on the stock market and wake up richer in the morning and keep virtually all the cash and tell everybody how clever you and your ilk are?
Being an ex sapper and used to digging ‘oles in the ground, with a map showing a ground survey with the supposed image of a crate, I would be smearing the dirt away from the cockpit canopy by now, peering at an immaculate green painted cockpit interior.
I wonder what the problem is?
You only have to look at what the BBMF have done with PA474 to keep it flying that you realize its a big task. PA474 has Tornado wiring which has lightened the aircraft and made it easier to check its systems and also the re-spar job which was necessary to extend the flying hours. ‘Jane’ has not had this done but I wonder how long it would be before it would need to be?
we found a piece of datum longeron years ago at an old dump with a spiteful number on it! would be interested to see a pic!
Any chance of a picture of the canopy Tony?
Graham.