dark light

Spartabus

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 297 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #972623
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Bristol Triplane to Bristol-Curtiss Biplane to Curtiss Triplane

    http://flyingmachines.ru/Images7/Flight/1916/994-1.jpg

    Curtiss Scout S

    Spartabus
    Participant

    I work literally 3 minutes from MOSI and it has been allowed to decline since Col. Davis left. Money is spent on the most ridiculous things! For example there was recently advertised, an exhibition of photos of people smiling yet there is no exhibition space actually dedicated to the Station’s role in history. It is across the road from the terminus of the Bridgewater and Rochdale canals and Adjacent to the Manchester Bury and Bolton, Manchester and Salford Junction and the Manchester Ship Canal but there is no mention at all of the inland waterways of the area. When the staff are doing presentations they have to bellow to the visitors as there is no P.A. system. Most of the trained conservators and guides are being laid off and replaced with security guards. Network rail are proposing to cut off the rail access to MOSI and demolish the grade 1 listed viaduct in order to build a chord at Ordsall. The roof in the Air and Space building leaks all over the exhibits and many have tarps over them to protect them from damage. The main gates have been covered with advertising boards so the place looks permanently closed, this is an attempt to herd visitors in to the entrance hall where they get mugged by the ‘Chuggers’ employed to obtained donations. I probably donate about £20 a month to various projects there directly but I can see that stopping unless the rot is reversed.
    On the flip side, the Planet recreation and Agecroft no2 are immaculate and the quality of work undertaken on the air and space exhibits is first class. A quick look around inside the Shack is a revelation and the Bristol Belverdere cockpit, still complete with mascot and period maps, is a delight!

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #973302
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Oooh, I love a good multi engined triplane!
    http://www.probertencyclopaedia.com/photolib/transport/Bristol%20Pullman%20Triplane.jpg

    Bristol Pullman,
    (and this would make for an amazing modern replica!)

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #974243
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Port of Amsterdam to….
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]217239[/ATTACH]

    Port of London

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #978108
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Shuttleworth prom to:-
    http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7030/6526454291_9ebe9cc98d_o.jpg
    Southport Prom

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #979050
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Now this is a Pup
    http://0.tqn.com/d/militaryhistory/1/0/y/2/-/-/SopwithPup.jpg

    (First page in a few that I haven’t posted the first picture, how odd LOL!)

    in reply to: General Discussion #283565
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Thanks chaps – but, none of that answers my point. The three examples I gave, were very efficiently – according to reports – killed by the Police. There have been at least another three examples I could have given that reached the same conclusion – instant death.

    What was it about the Woolwich killing that appeared to alter the situation?

    Based upon my personal experiences of similar situations – although a long time ago, I do not think that Police judgment and skill with small arms is to be trusted. Far better to use selected Service units on permanent rotated standby to deal with any similar eventuality.

    If, as I believe could be the case, the events of Woolwich, in time, become more frequent then, the use of Army units might become the norm.

    Very straightforward answer to this, it is down to the perception of the situation at the time and the resource available. The words ‘Armed Police’ are key, they would be armed with Semi-Auto MP5s or a Glock 17, both loaded with 9mm dumdum rounds, designed to lose energy on penetration and therefore not carry through and wound passers by. One of those in the thigh will ruin any future chance of appearances on Strictly Come Dancing.
    The Drunken Lawyer was, from memory, waving a shotgun around and had fired out of the window, the officer in this case is refered to as a Police Marksman who would have used a HK G3 with a 7.62mm un-jacketed round. Again, this round is an impact round, designed to cavitate inside the body and even an extremity hit by such ammunition is going to sign you off work permanently. This is a precision weapon, specifically intended to take out someone who represents a significant danger (as a man waving a shotgun a people does!) from a safe distance. In the desperately sad case on the tube, it was assumed that the back pack was a bomb, armed police (note, not Police Marksman/men) responded as they had been trained to do so, minimizing the perceived risks to the public.
    I am not familiar with the case of the pensioner so cannot comment.

    However

    There is a general understanding that ‘Shoot to incapacitate’ is not a recommended procedure as a wounded person can still use a back up weapon or a suicide device. I think it is likely that the two men in London were very, very lucky.

    in reply to: Terror incident in London #1880419
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Thanks chaps – but, none of that answers my point. The three examples I gave, were very efficiently – according to reports – killed by the Police. There have been at least another three examples I could have given that reached the same conclusion – instant death.

    What was it about the Woolwich killing that appeared to alter the situation?

    Based upon my personal experiences of similar situations – although a long time ago, I do not think that Police judgment and skill with small arms is to be trusted. Far better to use selected Service units on permanent rotated standby to deal with any similar eventuality.

    If, as I believe could be the case, the events of Woolwich, in time, become more frequent then, the use of Army units might become the norm.

    Very straightforward answer to this, it is down to the perception of the situation at the time and the resource available. The words ‘Armed Police’ are key, they would be armed with Semi-Auto MP5s or a Glock 17, both loaded with 9mm dumdum rounds, designed to lose energy on penetration and therefore not carry through and wound passers by. One of those in the thigh will ruin any future chance of appearances on Strictly Come Dancing.
    The Drunken Lawyer was, from memory, waving a shotgun around and had fired out of the window, the officer in this case is refered to as a Police Marksman who would have used a HK G3 with a 7.62mm un-jacketed round. Again, this round is an impact round, designed to cavitate inside the body and even an extremity hit by such ammunition is going to sign you off work permanently. This is a precision weapon, specifically intended to take out someone who represents a significant danger (as a man waving a shotgun a people does!) from a safe distance. In the desperately sad case on the tube, it was assumed that the back pack was a bomb, armed police (note, not Police Marksman/men) responded as they had been trained to do so, minimizing the perceived risks to the public.
    I am not familiar with the case of the pensioner so cannot comment.

    However

    There is a general understanding that ‘Shoot to incapacitate’ is not a recommended procedure as a wounded person can still use a back up weapon or a suicide device. I think it is likely that the two men in London were very, very lucky.

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #980194
    Spartabus
    Participant

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/SAL_Bulldog_T.1_XX616_%273%27_Mcr_UAS_WVL_12.03.83_edited-3.jpg

    Bulldog to Bulldog

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #983268
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Fighter Recon?

    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f2/Supermarine_Swift_FR.5_XD905_V-A_Farnborough_10.09.55_edited-2.jpg

    Supermarine Swift FR5

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #984977
    Spartabus
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]216898[/ATTACH]
    From a Viking at Northolt to a Viking at Northolt

    in reply to: Anyone got £53,500 spare?? #986289
    Spartabus
    Participant

    So Mr Oliver has got bored of his toys, has he?

    Actually thinking about it, I thought that this was an asset of the Oliver Merlin Trust? Has he shut it down?

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #986470
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Vickers Viking to

    http://www.bombercommandmuseum.ca/photos/p_vickersviking2.jpg

    The other Vickers Viking

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #987639
    Spartabus
    Participant

    Smart a**e LOL!

    Challenge accepted though,

    http://www.aviation-history.com/boeing/pw9-2a.jpg

    Single engined Boeing with Mahogony main spars

    in reply to: And Now For Something Completely Different Thread MK3 #990367
    Spartabus
    Participant

    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-1DqCCwc3Bcw/TmgSi7nkRmI/AAAAAAAAAAg/cLiLR7rR16M/s1600/off.jpg

    Sycamore to Spruce

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 297 total)