I have the same problem.
It is different.
That is an important thing in a museum, especially one where to the uninitiated there are lots of British WWII aircraft all in the same paint scheme. Some people seeing a Spitfire and a Hurricane for the first time cannot tell the difference because they are painted in the same colour scheme.
It is also historically accurate for the airframe in question. The ‘enthuiasts’ should not whinge if an airframe is portrayed in such a scheme that also challenges the general public to look further at the aircraft in view.
I particularly like the prototype’s portrayal at London Colney. That in my opinion shows off the lines of the a/c to advantage – albeit a little garishly! If we can stimulate interest in aircraft such as the Mossie, a search on the internet can reward Joe Public with a large amount of information. Anything that could generate that initial spark of interest and is historically accurate is good in my book.
Poddington? aka Santa Pod
Since De Cadenet was expecting a low pass and the sound of the a/c would have lagged behind at that speed surely the a/c was above and beyond when he hit the deck? Or was he supposed to react in the way he did no matter what?
English winter versus a Russian winter? if I was a Polikarpov I would even go tech to stay in a nice warm Duxford hanger.
beautiful aircraft – give you 10 quid for the car though – more than It’s worth but we have to be kind to the colonials
A proper intercom won’t cost much
“I remember an artists impression appearing in a RAF yearbook of Concorde in Transport Command markings so yes, there were plans for the RAF to operate a number. Apart from that I know nothing about the details or even how serious the plan was. It was in an era when just about everything was being cancelled that had wings so it probably never stood a chance.
I’m sorry Peter feels his thread didn’t get the respose he hoped. It did get a lot of people viewing it. We also all know by now that almost everything is subjected to ridicule etc once posted on this site. I think it’s part of the charm myself. Just a personal opinion.
Andy”
I don’t know how serious it was but there wasn’t an interceptor that could have got close without running out of fuel!
I would love to have a Vulcan – or anything – maybe this guy can make it happen – the previous owner didn’t. I read the whinging about the slow decay of the airframe – the advent of the inevitable scrapman. This guy wants to makre it happen and all that happens it the forum says he is a fool. He may be a fool this time but he may want to preserve something worthy as far as the experts are concerned next time,
Give the guy a break and if possible assistance.
the pic of the Spitfire …………. (to be filled in by those who know the mark!) id number ……………….. (same again) is stunning
Only one word – WOW!
I remember my father, having made models as a kid during WWII, laboriously trying to piece together an extremely complicated plastic kit of a Sikorsky Helecopter for me.
This all happened on Christmas day with the dining room table being required for other things. The following kits he built or bought for me were considerably simpler!
I have to object here.
Concorde will not or never can fit in with the warbirds only ethos of Flying Legends.
Unless it’s the rare Mk.IIa version equipped by the RAF to carry cruise missiles.
Two of these were operated by 87 Sqn. for two years between 1986 and 87 at Wyton.
A..
Many a true word spoken in jest.
There was an item in one of the Battle of Britain programmes in the early seventies that referred to a study into the possible use of Concorde as a supersonic bomber! Concorde could have been a warbird and possibly still in active service!
Cheers
Dave
Here are a couple of pics of a homebuilt at Sun’n’fun in 2004
Coltishall Battle of Britain Day 1966 is the earliest programme I have. Not sure whether that was the first show I went to though. I was 9 at the time.