dark light

ericmunk

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 1,519 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • ericmunk
    Participant

    Sorry Eric I had a look but could not find any in the workshop.

    Dave

    Thanks for looking Dave. We’ll find some somewhere though.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Yep, as seen here, the oring also is designed to absorb vibrations

    http://www.savigny-oddie.co.uk/oddiefasteners.htm

    Thanks. I don’t see any vibrations being an issue in this aircraft though, since it is distinctly lacking an engine.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    They also require a small rubber retaining ring to be fitted once the Oddie fastener is through the panel to make it captive and “floating”. Small neoprene rubber O-rings are easily and cheaply available for this, though I don’t know what the situation would be for a flying aircraft. Original stock rings would probably be perished by now.

    Anon.

    Thanks Anon, that is news to me, I have only seen them without (on gliders). Have suitable o-rings though, so will find out what’s the better option…

    Eric

    in reply to: Autobiographies Of Aircraft Mechanics? #936268
    ericmunk
    Participant

    ‘Picking up the pieces’ by Denny McCartney. On his adventures as an Insurance adjuster/aircraft mechanic getting wrecked aircraft out of the Canadian bush to ferry them to an airfield for proper repairs, in the 1950s, 1960s. Unbelievable stuff there.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Good one, let me get back to you on that one. The bit they fit on (the fuselage) is in storage until the end of January due to other workshop engagements.

    ericmunk
    Participant

    Thank you Jon, that looks indeed to be it. Never heard of it until today, but we have similar ones on other aircraft. They seem to be restricted to British-built aircraft…

    in reply to: T.21 Restoration #936504
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Could you tell me the tyre size for a T.21 please

    It’s a 6.00-4 6pr tyre. If you have a servicable one to spare, I’d be more than happy to take it off your hands πŸ˜‰

    Alternatively, there’s a BGA-approved Mod out there for replacing it with a 355×150 4pr tyre with a 5.00-4 (TR67) tube.

    in reply to: T.21 Restoration #936524
    ericmunk
    Participant

    New trailing edges going in. Can’t have enough glue clamps!

    in reply to: T.21 Restoration #936667
    ericmunk
    Participant

    More pics. We finally got around to rigging the entire aft bit of the aircraft last week. All attachments are now correctly fitted, the tailplane struts have been adjusted accordingly to accommodate the new hardware in the fuselage. The vertical tail has received the cut-out for the elevator, allowing room for it to be trial-rigged as well. Note new trailing edges going into the elevator. The old ones contained some appalling repairs.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224013[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]224014[/ATTACH]
    In the meantime, we are looking for the special bolt in the picture, albeit of a smaller size (about 3 cm in length) to fit the pilots’ backrests and the tail fairing. Anybody knows where to get these (we need three)?
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]224015[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Ex RAFG Glider in evilbay #938868
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Add another one to your list:
    RAFGSA.258, a GΓΆ.4 II s/n 6060 (license-built by Fokker in 1948). The former PH-178 that became BGA.1642 afterwards. Was flown from RAF Brueggen in the 1960s. Identity not 100 percent confirmed, but pretty sure.

    in reply to: The All New 2013 "Wot Plane" (see post 4 for rules) #941702
    ericmunk
    Participant

    First thought was T31 but those enormous flaps are not right, nor is the nose. Is it the Slingsby T20 then?

    It is the T.20, the only RAF aircraft ever sunk by the Royal Navy (after it went overboard during carrier turbulence trials).

    in reply to: The All New 2013 "Wot Plane" (see post 4 for rules) #942718
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Dizzy? Here’s some fresh air from an open cockpit glider…
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]223756[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: The All New 2013 "Wot Plane" (see post 4 for rules) #942746
    ericmunk
    Participant

    PZL TS-8 Bies

    in reply to: The All New 2013 "Wot Plane" (see post 4 for rules) #942777
    ericmunk
    Participant

    Alors, correctly identified AND bonus points. The IS-28B-2 must be the tallest glider I have flown. Needed a step ladder to wash the stabilizer top surface.

    in reply to: The All New 2013 "Wot Plane" (see post 4 for rules) #942783
    ericmunk
    Participant

    It is an extremely modified Schneider ES.52 Kookaburra II, known as the VanStan Kookaburra. It had its wings lowered an impressive 11 inches, fuselage height lowered by about the same, a new bubble canopy, redesigned rudder, removed skid, main wheel further forward, tail wheel added and the D-nose near the fuselage redesigned. One (re)built, still flying. The original rudder bears a striking resemblance to the Grunau Baby rudder. Not surprisingly, since that was what the Schneiders were building in large numbers until the factory was overrun by the Russians in WW2, and the Schneider ended up in Australia by invitation. The modified rudder however, is an elegant design by Doug VanStan.

    All yours I would say.

    PS: the pointy thingy is an ICA-Brasov IS-28B-2 Lark.

Viewing 15 posts - 766 through 780 (of 1,519 total)