And if your German is up to scratch, try ‘Segelflugpraxis – Der Bau von Gleit- und Segelflugzeugen’ by Hans Jacobs. Hard to find, but worth its weight in gold.
Yes, I have some of the wheel mod drawings at home. We’re looking into that as we might have to rebuilt part of the wheelbox anyway. Wings will come up for survey later. First finishing stripping the fuselage and detailing/photogrpahing everything that’s needed to be done first.
Stripped the fuselage bare last night. The structure is in generally remarkably good condition, just some small old repairs that need replacing and some minor woodwork required. Lots of work in the controls. Cockpit windows have been discarded (all smashed). Tyre and tube are gone too. Found some serious heavy landing damage that had apparently gone unnoticed (bent skid attachments, delaminated skid, etc.) but nothing we can’t sort out. All main pins corroded beyond saving, and all fittings will have to come out for refurbishment.
The list of things we need is growing:
– Tyre and tube
– Two cockpit windshields
– Main skid
– Set of fittings that join the horizontal stabilizer to the stabilizer struts (left and right)
If you can help with these, please let me know.
The book is right. And so are you 😉
Rubik R-26 Gobé, built in 1961.
Cyclone Yasi just got upgraded to cat. 5, unheard of in recent years. Landfall within 24 hours. Here’s hoping for the best for everybody there. And – less important perhaps – for the significant Sid Beck collection and Warbirds Adventures Museum both at Mareeba and the RAAF Museum annex at Townsville, all right in its path…
Try this one, not a twin. And not American either.
*cough* sailplanes *cough*
Things are not exactly getting better weatherwise in the Sunshine State… Good luck to all the upcoming days…
Spent this evening stripping and surveying the stabilizer. In quite a good nick, although we’ll have to completely replace the elevator trailing edge (poor repairs, bent), and there’s one or two minor repairs. Also, the stabilizer strut attachment fittings (the ones that are bolted onto the stabilizer main spar) are beyond saving. Would anyone happen to have a spare set of these? We need a set for both left and right.
Also, anybody out there who can confirm of these are interchangeable with other Slingsby types? They seem to be very similar to the T38 and T30 we have…
Soooo. End of a long Saturday today. Managed to finally get the paperwork done for the trailer yesterday, and sped off to get the aircraft from its temporary storage into the workshop. Pics attached of the storage site, and of the RAF roundel that we had uncovered on one of the wings of this civilian-built T.21. Turns out the wings and tailplane were changed with Air Cadet ones in the 1960s following a major damage (which also involved rebuilding the aft fuselage and fitting a new-built nose). Found remnants of a silver-dope colour scheme and the yellow band too.
Somebody at the museum claimed it flew, but like I said I have no further details. And no, an aircraft does not need wings to fly. A lifting body is also a possibility, and seems to be the way they designed this little ‘thing’. Looked capable of (low) flying, certainly. Not sure if it ever did though…
@AvionAncien: I would think nobody would come closer than you. The Paukku Sky Arrow is not exactly a highly publicized aircraft… 😉
Over to you AvionAncien. I would say it is that, but like I said, I have no further information other than that is known as a (the?) Paukku Sky Arrow. It was sitting behind the museum at Helsinki-Vantaa. I’m not sure whether the museum people know what to do with it either. Any information on this ‘thing’ is appreciated.
Not a float. This is the main chunk of the aircraft, apparently.
Not German either. Although the swastika did play a major part in the country’s aviation heritage.
Clue number 1: It’s European.
To be exact, it’s both. Low-level radiation from the engine cases of J79’s (part-thorium) and another J79 component (part-cesium). And there’s one or two components in that engine that contain asbestos. So far for the F-104.
Because the J85 (F-5) also contains the same part-cesium-part and some asbestos, these too were affected. Dutch air force has reclaimed all J79s and J85s from Dutch technical schools. Museums are not affected, as the engines are not being worked on.