dark light

JohnWoo

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 160 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2599506
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    It is really unbelievable to have 7 engines as spare for one aircraft. This is the first time I heard about it.

    Several thoughts right out of my imagination:
    1) The engine must be crap, it only have a around 100 hours service life to have 7 add up to be 1000.
    2) The aircrafts must be very busy in the ground very often to keep changing the engines instead of flying.
    3) IAF must be very rich, they spent around 60-65 millions for a single fighter (around 35-40 mil plus 25 mil: 3.5mil X 7 engines)
    4) They spent around 8 billions for total of 120 bare-bone aircraft and engines plus weapons, avionic, and other system. Then the total project is way over 10 billions. But, recall from my memory of reading from the past, the amount they spent is much less than this.
    5) The sale of 920 engines encourages Russia not to fix problems, but to produce more defected merchandises. This is a large amount of order plus producing for China. So they really have to rush out all orders in a short period of time, a sign of bad quality and more defects.

    This stated number is really way out of reasonable. Something wrong here, may be someone is lying or made it up. Until there is a concrete approve or evidence of such transaction, no one is going to believe it.

    in reply to: Indian Naval MiG-29K v/s Cinese Su-30MKK2 #2599932
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    About PLAAF training, anyone remember a photo that a guy wearing sunglass and some model of F-16 in the background?

    I have read somewhere that this is an island PLAAF used to train their pilots as they are attacking Taiwan Island.

    There are numerous number of this kind of battlefields built by China to train their military personel, some of them are in land and some are offshore islands.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 9 #2599939
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    via CMF,

    Lineup of “02” and “?”

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 8 #2603800
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Last time I read an article, China collecting interest from US bond is nearly 8 billions a year.

    That is more than enough to buy military hardwares from other countries, (spent around 4 billions to purchase from Russia in 2004).

    in reply to: Agosta 70 vs Song vs Foxtrot vs Type-206 #2070358
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Stated in Globalsecurity:
    The Project 641 (Foxtrot) submarines were derivatives of the Whiskey and Romeo class diesel boats.

    So, it is just an equivalant of old Chinese Ming class which modified from “R” class.

    A total of at least 57 and and as many as 62 units were believed to have been built for the Soviet Navy until 1967. Historically there were more than ten Foxtrots in the Baltic Fleet (numerically the largest fleet in the Russian navy); today there are none. Reportedly by early-2000 only three boats of this class remain in service, though the identity of these units is somewhat obscure, and they are expected to be retired shortly.

    Even Soviet retired all its fleet of 62, it is consider garbage in modern day. India still using it because there were no other proper replacement due to financial constraint.

    in reply to: Agosta 70 vs Song vs Foxtrot vs Type-206 #2070401
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Wow, India modified WWII era sub automatically became so modern and it beat Chinese latest subs.
    I don’t even recall India build its own sub.

    What a crap!!!

    in reply to: Agosta 70 vs Song vs Foxtrot vs Type-206 #2070550
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    If this WWII era FOXTROT is so good, India should buying and operating more.
    Why the hell it has only 2, and going to retire soon?

    Your logic is since Mig-21 sold thousands of planes, it shoud be better than J-10 since it never export.

    In your view, all new systems built by China is not even as good as India operated
    WWII garbage. Who is nationalist here?

    in reply to: Agosta 70 vs Song vs Foxtrot vs Type-206 #2070564
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    No, not cheat. In our modern era, it’s called advertisement.

    In another word is “propagenda”

    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Time for JH-7A?

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 8 #2608742
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    They said it is WAR-1 Missile?
    What is that, this is the first time I heard about it.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2611999
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    How do you guys think of J11’s surface finishing ? 🙂

    Stil need some improvement.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2613168
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    I didn’t see J-6, only JJ-5s … in Xinjiang

    It’s my bad.
    Yes, it’s all JJ-5s, I thought the one far away is J-6.

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2613346
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Wow, China still has these J-5 and J-6 in service!!

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2613565
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Fake or really from CCTV?

    in reply to: China's News, Pics and Speculation Part 7 #2613569
    JohnWoo
    Participant

    Think so, said it has supercruise!

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 160 total)