dark light

redvanner

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Duxford Diary 2013 #965108
    redvanner
    Participant

    Duxford was quite busy today with the ‘Quilt Show’ hitting town again. The weather was a bit rubbish.:D

    http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y200/penpusher/09%20Duxford%202013/05%20Bimble/03-4.jpg

    Brian

    Maybe someone could use the left-over quilts to create a “Plane Wash” ?

    Michael

    in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #967087
    redvanner
    Participant

    Thanks for posting these great photos Matthias. Expanding on Bruce’s post (and I’m looking forward to seeing this one fly again, having been waiting for restoration to start since first seeing it at Tangmere over 25 years ago) I have mixed feelings about it. In some way it is almost a shame to ‘rebuild’ it, as most of the original material will inevitably discarded after being used for patterns.

    Wouldn´t it be a good idea to put even the main parts of the non-airworthy material in a static exhibition (model) as is, meaning to avoid parts being used for another Emil, have them used as a cutaway?

    Michael

    P.S.: Thanks for posting those pics, Matthias. Your effort is much appreciated.

    in reply to: JG 26 ww2 color slides on ebay #986820
    redvanner
    Participant

    utterly ridiculous prices though

    Just thought the same when I looked what the seller is asking for.
    I doubt anybody will pay that amount.

    Michael

    in reply to: Russell Aviation Group #992284
    redvanner
    Participant

    The 150 hr full overhaul for the ME109 that I quoted above comes directly from the Transport Canada Dept that issued its flight permit to fly in Canada.
    This is what one of their Inspectors ( whom I know personally ) told me .

    @Fleet16b: They are correct with this as well. I found an operation and maintenance manual for DB 601 A and B, issue C, by Daimler Benz, published in October 1940 (of course in German). I believe other engine subtypes of the 60x lineage are described likewise in their respective manuals.

    At II. F, Engine Maintenance it says on page 52:

    6. After approximately 100 operating hours a part overhaul has to be done. Postponing it for 20 hours is possible without any additional work. If it is neccessary to prolong engine operating hours due to operational reasons, the engine has to be checked on site in advance. If checks prove the engine to be ok, the operating hours can be extended to a maximum of 150 hours.

    7. After approximately 200 hours a main overhaul has to be done.
    Postponing it for 20 hours is allowed in case of need (emergency?).

    I translated the above parts myself, so there might be some glitches, but I hope it might be better than a google translation, lol.

    What I get from it is the following:
    Usual recommended TBO´s are 100 and 200 hours.
    Time for part overhaul (100 hours) can be extended to 120, absolute maximum 150 hours.
    Time for main overhaul is 200 hours, only to be extended if absolutely neccessary (wartime? operational needs) till 220 hours.

    source: http://www.avialogs.com/en/engines-categories/item/7550-6668betriebsundwartungsvorschriftzummercedes-benzflugmotordb601undb#download

    Only question I do have (and can not answer myself) is, if it really makes sense financially, to extend the 100 hours overhaul to 150 hours with prolonging possible wear, only to have a main overhaul only 50, or absolute maximum 70 hours later?

    Michael

    in reply to: Russell Aviation Group #995645
    redvanner
    Participant

    I can’t find it at the moment but I have an article about the Russell Aviation Group Bf-109 from about 10 years ago that I believe said that the engine must be rebuilt every 200 hours. That doesn’t really mean anything but I’m pretty sure that was the figure quoted in the magazine article. I’ll try and find it later.

    This is what I posted on “another” forum answering a similar question regarding DB 6XX engines:

    I posted a question on a German aviationforum. regarding TBO´s of DB engines. A forumite, “78587?”, involved with “Messerschmitt Foundation”, wrote the following:
    Part Overhaul: every 100 Hours, Main Overhaul: every 200 Hours, maximum lifetime: 600 Hours, as by the original DB-documents and (original) approval by German aviation authorities.

    Michael

    I do not know what the difference of “Part Overhaul” or “Main Overhaul” mean, but it might well mean a rebuilt every 200 hours as you wrote. Additionally he wrote, that 600 hours maximum lifetime might be surpassed, if every item is inspected and still in the limits described by the manufacturer (DB).

    Michael

    in reply to: What book would you like to see on the big screen? #937875
    redvanner
    Participant

    Erwin Morzfeld: He Flew By My Side (original title: Er flog an meiner Seite), [title is translated literally]. If you can get a copy, read it. It is worth reading!!

    Michael

    in reply to: MOD has trademarked "The Dambusters" and "617 Squadron" #962152
    redvanner
    Participant

    Did MoD trademark RAF or Royal Air Force?

    I am pondering if not trying to trademark both or even one, if not trademarked already. :diablo: Well, they could trademark Luftwaffe instead, I wouldn´t mind…… :dev2:

    Ok, being reasonable: The matter seems to be quite stirred up. When the dust settles, you will just find out,they are trying to cover their behinds, and get an extra pound this way or that. Be happy, it will be subtracted off your taxes. Or not. Take your choice.

    What about trademarking Typhoon or Hawk…..?

    I´ll get my coat

    Michael

    in reply to: FW190 found in forest near Lenningrad (2008) #962645
    redvanner
    Participant

    Steve Hinton has flown both – no idea what he has said about them though.

    I have not read nor heard anything he said first hand, but IIRC someone wrote, Steve Hinton did not talk that positively about the Flugwerk replica with P&W in comparison to the original 190 during a convention at Chino. It seems to lack some of the qualities that make the difference between a good and a better aircraft.

    Michael

    in reply to: FW190 found in forest near Lenningrad (2008) #962653
    redvanner
    Participant

    Well I think its an absolutely fantastic job Bruce. Seeing the results of this aircraft flying after all that dedication and hard restoration work is just Brilliant.

    Seeing the video of this FW190 flying makes me think of the Tip and run raids on Torquay, what it must have been like then. I see now why it was nicknamed the butcher bird.

    If you think it was called butcher bird because of its abilities, you are wrong. Focke-Wulf gave all (or at least most) of their planes nicknames, all of them birds. For example Fw 44 Stieglitz – goldfinch, Fw 56 Stösser – sparrow hawk, Fw 58 Weihe – harrier, Fw 187 Falke – falcon [hawk], Fw 189 Uhu – eagle owl, Fw 200 Kondor – condor, several others, and last but not least Fw 190 Würger – shrike or butcher bird.

    Michael

    in reply to: Junior Museum Hermeskeil #970766
    redvanner
    Participant

    Did you get a better shot of the Viscount?

    Only this one:

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/Flugausstellung%20Junior%20Hermeskeil/IMG_0472_zps14b53551.jpg

    Michael

    in reply to: Czech Republic Air Museum photos #988546
    redvanner
    Participant

    Thank you for posting those brilliant pics. Though the museum at Kbely seems to be quite crowded, IMHO it´s better to have the planes stored inside, then having better access and photo possibilities, but having to put some of the unique ones outside.

    Michael

    in reply to: Dornier G-BMFG #991697
    redvanner
    Participant

    ……..

    Aircraft needs avionics upgrade and a paint job. Speaking of which, having politely written to ask the German Embassy (Air Attache) for permission to paint it in 1960s Luftwaffe colours they wrote back and said Nein for legal reasons…

    Not sure what legal reasons means exactly but no means no so re thinking colour scheme.

    Pictures to follow

    Nor do I have any idea why they did not gave you permission to paint it in its former colours. Especially as there are a lot of them flying in their original paintjob in Germany. Maybe they have a problem with the ´60 ies camouflage, but not with the more recent ones? Or it is, because being registered in Britain? But some of the Do 28´s are registered in Hungary…., well, it seems to be highly illogical to me.

    http://www.flugzeugforum.de/dornier-flugzeuge-flugfaehig-24636.html

    you have to register to view the pics, if they don´t show

    Michael

    in reply to: Happy Christmas #993603
    redvanner
    Participant

    A HAPPY CHRISTMAS to all fellow forumites…………!!!!

    Planemike

    Seconded.

    Michael

    in reply to: Were Bf.109s meant to be rail-transportable? #993608
    redvanner
    Participant

    There has been a similar question on another forum. I posted the linked answer there. Due to having no access to my own computer at the moment, I just link my post here (can not post the pics otherwise):

    http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=41465&hilit=Bf+109&start=15

    Merry Christmas

    Michael

    in reply to: What Did You Do In The War Dad/Mum/Grandad #1008176
    redvanner
    Participant

    My maternal Grandfather was an infantryman in WW I, he and his comrades had to eat meat from horses killed some time before to survive. He became ill, and had to be very careful what to eat because of stomach problems thereafter. My paternal Grandfather was with the artillery, got shrapnel wounded in the head, it took a long time for him to recover. He could not use his right hand for a long time, so he had to use his left. When I got to know him, he wrote and made drawings using either his left or his right hand, though the small drawings he did with his left were a bit better. My mother was translating in a steelconstruction company German into Russian where there were femaleworkers. My father learned glider flying locally at the NSFK when 14. When he was 16 his whole class from school went to serve as “Luftwaffenhelfer” to support the regular units operating 8,8 cm Flak cannons near (around) Wesseling, just south of Cologne. When he was accepted by the Luftwaffe, he went to an A/B school near Stolp, where he finished the basic training. He then was sent to Böblingen near Stuttgart, where he absolved advanced training. Desperate to become a fighterpilot, he was shattered when he was member of the first term that could not move on to preoperational units, due to lack of petrol. Every and each training was cancelled at that time. He then went to a site near Munich, got an infantery training and was promoted to platoon leader. His own words, describing his unit was: “Only grandfathers and children….” Mind, he only got 18 on the 30th of April 1945! His unit saw fighting in northern Italy near Lake Garda, disbanded after war´s end. He was caught by American MP in Bavaria trying to get home, due to betrayal of a Bavarian farmer. He then was American POW.

    Michael

Viewing 15 posts - 196 through 210 (of 338 total)