dark light

redvanner

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: News at MeierMotors GmbH / Bremgarten South Germany #1008513
    redvanner
    Participant

    Hi, Matthias. Thanks again for your fantastic updates!
    Isn’t the G59 being rebuilt as a G55 Centauro fighter?

    @Oxcart: Without wanting to step in the place of Matthias, the answer is: Yes. It will be a (re?) conversion of a G.59 Merlin powered 2 seater to a G.55 DB 605 powered single seater Centauro. Have a look here:

    http://meiermotors.com/en/aircraft/fiat-g55–g59-centauro-.html

    Regards

    Michael

    in reply to: Dear Santa … What I *Really* Want Is #939759
    redvanner
    Participant

    Well, having seen that splendid video of the ground run Fw 190 S-8 in the ´70ies, I got very greedy. A back seat flight in a (to be build) FW (will do :diablo:) 190 S. A Bf 109 G-12 or HA-1112 M4-L (I do know where a (non-airworthy) one sits) would do as well, lol. No, being sound, going for real possibilities. 30 mins in a Spitfire T.9 or Mustang TF-51 would be sufficient Ersatz. If money has to rule, a T-6 ride of 15 mins. will be fine as well.
    But…. what would we be without our dreams???

    Dreamless.

    Only alternative I see at the moment is mulled wine and mince pies instead. 😀

    Michael

    in reply to: Me 410 engine run? #953658
    redvanner
    Participant

    Great video of an extremely rare plane. If only it were a flyer….. sigh. Although I am not sure if I would want it flown regularly, given its rarity. But a video of even one flight would be… marvellous.

    Michael

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #954093
    redvanner
    Participant

    Somewhere I do have a photo I took, of a couple of A-10’s that came alongside off the port wing of the aircraft I was flying in over 20 years ago.

    Without wanting to pollute the Duxford thread, when reading your story I have to add my as well. In the late ´70 ies I was flying a ASK 13 glider over my home airfield in Germany at around 500 meters AGL, when I suddenly heard a roar somewhere beneath me. (Remember in those days several airforces did some very low level flying even outside the low level areas.) I remember flipping my head from left to right as fast as I could. Relief came, when I saw a 2 ship Phantom formation roughly 400 meters below me.

    Michael

    in reply to: Help identify Italian and German instrument placards #965546
    redvanner
    Participant

    The second one relates to an air intake lever in the cockpit I would say, probably the carberettor heating?

    It says:
    (left) I) normal take off, II) normal flight, III) emergency
    (right) I) flight over 3000 metres, II) take off in icing conditions, III) emergency

    Lower line: with extra air intake

    @ericmunk: IMHO you are correct with it, but the lower line. I would say it means: with clogged air intake (ice build up in intake).

    Michael

    in reply to: Macchi C.202 Photos #969269
    redvanner
    Participant

    http://www.sandersaircraft.com/restoration_fiat_g59b-zuccoli.asp

    Might not have to go that far. A Fiat G-59 was airworthy in Australia a few years ago as part of Guido Zuccoli’s collection (see link). The G-59 was essentially a G-55 re-engined with a Merlin (and a few other refinements). Not quite a Macchi 202/205 but of a similar era…..wishful thinking….similar silouette and engine sound if re-engined (re-re-engined?) with a DB605.

    Unfortunately, I don’t know what the current flight status of the G-59 is.

    Without wanting to deviate too far in the thread, a G-55 is under construction with the appropriate DB 605 at MeierMotors for Jerry Yagen´s Fighter Factory right now, using a G-59 airframe.

    http://www.meiermotors.com/en/aircraft/fiat-g55–g59-centauro-.html

    Michael

    in reply to: Another rarity at Meier Motors #974600
    redvanner
    Participant

    I like the proportions of the original (C-3603) one powered with Hispano-Suiza engine much better than the later conversion with Lycoming turboprop (C-3605). It looks more …… fitting.

    Michael

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Swiss_Air_Force_C-3603-1.jpg

    http://aero2.perso.sfr.fr/1000/fersui167.jpg

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #999491
    redvanner
    Participant

    Duxford Wednesday 24th October:

    ………..

    Finally, the arrival of He162A-1 Salamander 120235. I’m told this aircraft was flown from Duxford, I’ll need to check that out:

    ………..

    Without trying to sound clever, but: The He 162 never was called Salamander. It was the covername for it´s design program. The name given by Heinkel was “Spatz” meaning “Sparrow”, but usually and widely known as “Volksjäger”, loosely translated as “People´s Fighter” (intended to be flown by Hitlerjugend glider pilots).

    Sorry to be such a nitpicker. 😉

    Michael

    P.S.: Thank you for your splendid pics.

    in reply to: Seeking photos of Ju-160 cockpit, interior, plans #1000741
    redvanner
    Participant

    I am seeking detail photos of the Junkers Ju-160 German airliner for a resin modeling project. This is an obscure but important airliner that saw service in Europe and Asia during the thirties. Specifically I am seeking photos of the cockpit, passenger section, undercarriage, flying surfaces and in addition, need plans. Any help, advice or suggestions on any aspect of this search would be greatly appreciated.

    Hello Farmgate,
    have you tried the Junkers Museum in Dessau?

    http://www.technikmuseum-dessau.de/20englisch/20englisch.htm

    Michael

    in reply to: RAF Casualty Reports – Limited Public Consultation #1016042
    redvanner
    Participant

    When reading how British Authorities are dealing with RAF Casualty Reports….. well, I do not move very far abroad finding it normal? Usual? Maybe just like normal German authorical (right use of word?) behaviour? You never should doubt your superiours? Who knows, who has one (or several) corpses in his cellar? Those who were on the losing side could not cover up. The winners could (and did) try to save their behinds.
    To be straight: This is in no way meant Anti-British. But in every and each way Anti-Politician (those who blame others for their own faults). And I do include the German ones as well.

    The relatives of those who gave their lives for their motherland are entitled to know the truth. Even if it wasn´t the very best plot in what they were involved…..

    Michael

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1016651
    redvanner
    Participant

    Great pics, the RR Spitfire does look great indeed. Thanks to all photographers for posting their shots. I relish taking part in Duxfords goingons by watching your pics.

    Michael

    in reply to: Luftwaffe USAAF bomber rammers – April 1945 missions #1016659
    redvanner
    Participant

    Are there any photo’s of the Bestman’s with Panzerfaust’s?

    Hi Simon,

    yes, there are 2. Both are scans from “Luftwaffe `45”, Copyright by Manfred Griehl.

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/IMG_0001a.jpg

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/IMGa.jpg

    Many, many years ago I had the privilege to speak with a friend of my father, who was a trainee in late spring ´45, he flew Bü 181. He was very happy to have not been nominated to that suicide commando. He was able to fly one of the last planes of his unit to the west, to Goslar in the British sector.

    Michael

    in reply to: Luftwaffe USAAF bomber rammers – April 1945 missions #1016696
    redvanner
    Participant

    I am reading a book by Manfred Griehl “Luftwaffe ´45 – letze Flüge und Projekte” (last missions and projects). Though not directly connected to the ramming actions, one aspect was new to me. Most interestingly there was no lack of planes even in the last days of the war. What Griehl states, was an ever increasing lack of avgas (starting mid 1944), of (special or “new”) weapons and experienced pilots. Of the roughly 200 fighters for the ramming mission on April 7th there were 184 Bf 109 G (as ramming planes) and 48 Me 262 to keep the allied fighters at distance. Of those Bf 109 pilots most only had rudimentary abilities, as the experienced ones were not allowed to take part (Hajo Herrmann). Griehl writes: German losses: 77 pilots, 133 fighters, Allied losses: 23 4-engined bombers (mainly 3rd Air Division 8th USAF (though German sources state 60 downed bomber by ramming). One of those desperate last attemps was to fit Bücker 181 Bestmann´s with 4 Panzerfaust anti tank infantry weapons, flown by trainees.

    Michael

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1018154
    redvanner
    Participant

    Absolutely splendid! Just a dream… 🙂

    @DCW: And a big: Thank You! For your photographs.

    Michael

    in reply to: Duxford Diary 2012 #1028732
    redvanner
    Participant

    Absolutely splendid! Just a dream… 🙂

    @DCW: And a big: Thank You! For your photographs.

    Michael

Viewing 15 posts - 211 through 225 (of 338 total)