dark light

redvanner

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 338 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Arco buchon #1053128
    redvanner
    Participant

    Thanks for that, I can never remember what the reggy of this Buchon is (I used to think it was D-HDME at one point, too!)

    That shot would be around the time of Piece of Cake certainly. According to the Classic Aircraft article, the aircraft was entirely stock when restored, as it had never been used in Battle of Britain at all.

    Would make an interesting project for a model….

    @DazDaMan: Regarding registration there seems to be somewhere falsely written D-HEHD as well. But as the German registration system is quite straight, neither D-HDME nor D-HEHD are a possible registration code for an airplane, as D-HXXX is reserved for helicopters only. Single engine aircraft up to 2 metric tons MTOW have to have D-EXXX as registration, wheras single engine aircraft over 2 up to 5.7 tons have to have registered D-FXXX. All aircraft over 5.7 tons up to 14 tons have to have D-CXXX (X for any letter).

    (For the interested ones: 2010 there were only 153 planes D-FXXX registered)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_registration

    Michael

    P.S.: The Seafury TT 20 used in Germany as target tugs were registered D-CXXX, because due to the target towing equipment (generator, winch, target, cable etc.) MTOW was over 5.7 tons, without it (prior to installation) they were registered as D-FXXX. They had civil registration, as they were not operated by the Luftwaffe, but by a civil company.

    in reply to: Arco buchon #1054287
    redvanner
    Participant

    It’s a pity they haven’t been overly popular over the years, but are kinda seeing a renaissance in more recent years.

    There’s six current flyers:

    Merlin-engined:
    G-BWUE
    G-AWHE
    D-FMVS

    DB-engined:
    D-FMBB (‘109G-6)
    D-FEHD (‘109G-10)
    D-FWME (‘109G-4)

    I must say, despite the ‘109’s combat record etc, I simply prefer the Buchon!!

    The registration of EADS / Messerschmitt Flugmuseum´s Bf 109 G-10 is not D-FEHD but D-FDME. The original Buchon when owned by Hans Dittes was registered as D-FEHD. After conversion to G-10, it was newly registered as D-FDME in 1996. First flight with DB was performed by Mark Hanna at Mannheim in 1995. Dittes sold D-FDME in 2001, EADS / Messerschmitt is the owner since.
    They also own D-FMBB and D-FWME (bought from a private owner’s association{is that the correct translation? looks somewhat peculiar}).

    http://www.eads.com/eads/germany/de/unser-unternehmen/unser-erbe.html?openIframeBox=true

    http://www.messerschmitt-bf109.de/

    search for: H.A. 1112 M-1-L (serial no.) 213 (current marking) gelbe 3 (service No.) C.4K-141

    Michael

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/Buchon%20D-FEHD/1.jpg

    I shot this photo of D-FEHD at an airshow in Germany just before filming started for “A Piece Of Cake” IIRC. The man on the wing with blue cap is the pilot, Walter Eichhorn. He did most of the flying of Buchon´s and 109´s in Germany.

    http://s281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/

    in reply to: Junkers Jumo 213 Engine & materials used question #1085658
    redvanner
    Participant

    I don’t have this information, but there is/was apparently a restoration of the 213A done by LTB Dirk Bende GmbH near Bonn, Germany. This engine might be for Jerry Yagen’s FW-190D project, but thats conjecture on my part.
    http://www.ltb-dirkbende.de/Jumo_213a_en.html
    They may have the specific information or know where to source it for you.

    @TriangleP: This engine is not for Yagen´s project. Originally it was rebuilt for a German customer, who had to cancel the project years ago. The FW-190D project and engine went to Eric Vormezeele in Belgium AFAIK. Yagen´s one will be (is) rebuilt by Vintage V-12, aka Mike Nixon, Tehachapi (California).

    Michael

    in reply to: Yet another Spitfire flies. #1018613
    redvanner
    Participant

    Aren’t they already trying to flog off the Buchon?

    Right you are. But if you look at the list of the other ac, the Buchon does not fit in exactly, as it is (by my definition) a post WW II version of the Bf 109.
    AFAIK they purchased? want to buy an original Bf 109 E-3 currently under restoration in Britain. So it makes sense to part with the Buchon.
    I had the feeling when visiting there, they want to focus solely on ac used in WW II.
    So the Buchon might have been an Ersatz-Bf 109 in the first place, until an original could be found. Just my view of the things.

    Michael

    in reply to: Yet another Spitfire flies. #1027466
    redvanner
    Participant

    Aren’t they already trying to flog off the Buchon?

    Right you are. But if you look at the list of the other ac, the Buchon does not fit in exactly, as it is (by my definition) a post WW II version of the Bf 109.
    AFAIK they purchased? want to buy an original Bf 109 E-3 currently under restoration in Britain. So it makes sense to part with the Buchon.
    I had the feeling when visiting there, they want to focus solely on ac used in WW II.
    So the Buchon might have been an Ersatz-Bf 109 in the first place, until an original could be found. Just my view of the things.

    Michael

    in reply to: Yet another Spitfire flies. #1018643
    redvanner
    Participant

    It seems Air Fighter Academy based at Heringsdorf (Usedom) is constantly enlarging their collection. they do have by now (only airworthy and frequently flown ac):

    HA 1112 Buchon, Bücker Jungmann, NAA AT 6, Boeing Stearman, Polikarpov Po 2, Yakovlev Yak 9 UM, De Havilland D.H. 82 Tiger Moth and now Supermarine Spitfire T9 and NAA TF 51. (there would have been P 51 D BBD as well, if not crashed last year)

    I would say a quite impressive collection, especially regarding the short time since starting it. Well worth visiting if in the vicinity.

    Overall good collection, but poor website (at least so far, lol).

    Michael

    in reply to: Yet another Spitfire flies. #1027488
    redvanner
    Participant

    It seems Air Fighter Academy based at Heringsdorf (Usedom) is constantly enlarging their collection. they do have by now (only airworthy and frequently flown ac):

    HA 1112 Buchon, Bücker Jungmann, NAA AT 6, Boeing Stearman, Polikarpov Po 2, Yakovlev Yak 9 UM, De Havilland D.H. 82 Tiger Moth and now Supermarine Spitfire T9 and NAA TF 51. (there would have been P 51 D BBD as well, if not crashed last year)

    I would say a quite impressive collection, especially regarding the short time since starting it. Well worth visiting if in the vicinity.

    Overall good collection, but poor website (at least so far, lol).

    Michael

    in reply to: Rollason Turbulents, how many left? #1041034
    redvanner
    Participant

    I guess these can be classified as historic aircraft now so i thought i would post my question here. Does anyone know how many were built and how many are still flying? Feel free to post pictures!…………Martin

    I want to expand the question and add information regarding German built Turbulents as well. Wilhelm Stark of Minden/Germany produced a variant of Roger Duine´s Turbulent that met German LBA (Federal Aeronautical Office) requirements. About 35 were produced by the Stark company.

    http://www.deutsches-museum.de/en/collections/transport/aeronautics/propeller-planes/after-1945/stark-turbulent-d/

    Michael

    P.S.: The Stark Turbulent D was one of the first new registered types in Germany after WW II. Powered by a modified Volkswagen engine.

    in reply to: Airworthy European FW190s #1044649
    redvanner
    Participant

    AFAIK the ex Tom Blair one was finished (and test flown) by MeierMotors late last year and delivered to the (at least to me) unknown customer. Who it is, is not revealed by MeierMotors. The customer seems to like to keep a very low profile, at least at the moment.

    The other one (ex Christophe Jacquard) will be restored for Air Fighter Academy, but is on the back burner due to other projects for them.

    No new info about the D-FWJS the one Flugwerk is (was) testflying for a German customer.

    Michael

    in reply to: Why Inverted Engines? #1077189
    redvanner
    Participant

    Looking at the DB 605 engined Spit with its lower thrust line, it presumably had a smaller diameter prop than the Merlin version. So, did the DB 605 prop turn at a faster RPM than the Merlin?

    Mention has also been made of the low thrustline of the Ju 87, was this the reason it had a cranked wing? Remember the FU4 Corsair with its big prop needed a cranked wing to keep it undercarriage short (and strong for carrier landings).

    The DB Spitfire had the cowling of the Bf 110, air scoop of a Bf 109 G, redesigned engine support (reworked and fitted to the Spitfire bulkhead), the DB 605 A configured as a standard Bf 109 G series one, with standard G-series propinstallation and standard 109 G-series propblades of 3 metres diameter.
    As they wanted to find out the difference in performance, I doubt they changed anything regarding the engine but the enginemount (obviously necessary), and the complete electrical system and instruments, as the German ones worked on 24 Volts, British ones on 12 Volts. I read, changing the electrical system was the main time consuming work necessary. Max. continuous rpm was 2.300, take-off rpm 2.800.

    Michael

    in reply to: Why Inverted Engines? #1077694
    redvanner
    Participant

    Anyone got any side views of a Merlin-engined Spitfire Mk V and the captured Spitfire fitted with a DB 605??

    Then you could compare the ‘better’ visibility over the nose of the DB-engined Spit.

    Ken

    I don´t have any pics of a Spitfire Mk. V handy, but found some sideviews of the DB 605 engined one browsing the internet some time ago:

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/DB%20Spit/Hdbspit_1.jpg

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/DB%20Spit/Hdbspit_2.jpg

    http://i281.photobucket.com/albums/kk208/michaelmlerg/DB%20Spit/spit2.jpg

    Copyright: All pics found on the internet.

    To me it seems to be quite a snug fit. BTW the pilots were very impressed by this hybrid, they preferred it to the Merlin Spitfire as well as to the Messerschmitt Bf 109 G. Maybe somone with a big bag of cash might recreate one? Would be quite impressive, a Spitfire sounding like a Messerschmitt, lol. Messerschmitts sounding like Spitfires are common enough (Buchon).

    Michael

    P.S.: Would it be a Mk V db?

    in reply to: Warbird Sales #1078572
    redvanner
    Participant

    ……….

    I wonder why the Buchon has been put up for sale, though? I thought that the owners were putting together a proper bad-ass collection of warbirds – Spitfire T.9 MJ772 was going to their facility after completion, was it not?

    Well, I do not know, I am just guessing. When looking at the concept of their collection, it seems to me to be quite straight. They want to show the way a fighter pilot in WW II had to go – for 4 different Air Forces. Britain, USA, Russia and Germany. They do have flying primary trainers – Tiger Moth, Stearman, Po 2 and Bücker Jungmann. They have a flying Yak 9, had a flying P-51. They have a flying Buchon. They will get a TF-51, and a Spitfire T.9. And there seems to be a Bf 109 on the way. Maybe even a replacement P-51 some day and a Spitfire, I have no idea. A Bf 109 G-12 would be nice, but personally I doubt it (where would you get one?). But….. if you can get a Bf 109, why not sell the Buchon? That is only my guess, but it seems to have some logic in it IMHO.

    Michael

    in reply to: Epics of restoration #1020956
    redvanner
    Participant

    Yes, it has been covered in detail-just not on line;)

    Yes, I do know.

    Michael

    in reply to: Epics of restoration #1028675
    redvanner
    Participant

    Yes, it has been covered in detail-just not on line;)

    Yes, I do know.

    Michael

    in reply to: Epics of restoration #1020989
    redvanner
    Participant

    What about the restoration of FHC`s Fw 190 A-5? It took a lot of effort, sweat and manhours as well, but info of the restoration process seems to be somewhat restricted due to P. Allen´s publicity philosophy – or am I totally wrong?

    Michael

Viewing 15 posts - 256 through 270 (of 338 total)